SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

See how 2 guys can make a difference

Créé par: Rob32sjsharks
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 22 déc. 2021
Publié: 22 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
swapping 2 bad deals for players who fit needs.
yes Hindsight is 2020 but if we just let Labanc and Kane walk and picked up these two players instead look how much better a situation the sharks are in.
Better depth stronger group with a decent amount of cap space.
these two swapped players gives the sharks the ability to compete and this would be a playoff team.

I am aware neither team would do these trades this is a Hypothetical post where we signed these players in FA rather than signing Kane and Labanc.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Lindholm, Elias
Détails additionnels:
both were FA in 2018, sharks resigned Kane
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 254 167 $0 $460 000 $12 245 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 24
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,625
Mentions "j'aime": 10,909
Lindholm would have been RFA no?
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 28
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: Gmonwy
Lindholm would have been RFA no?


I thought he was a UFA. there are other options and some are bad (Neal) but it's more just for reference, we could have also resigned Pavelski and let Kane walk which would have also been a better idea.
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,751
Mentions "j'aime": 20,464
Lindholm has never hit the UFA market, he just turned 27 3 weeks ago
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Hyman only wanted to go to the Oilers, dont think this would have even been a possibility. He left money on the table to come to Edmonton
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,751
Mentions "j'aime": 20,464
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I thought he was a UFA. there are other options and some are bad (Neal) but it's more just for reference, we could have also resigned Pavelski and let Kane walk which would have also been a better idea.


Kane is a good hockey player, he was the best player on the Sharks last year. Nobody has the clairvoyance needed to see the current issues that have surrounded him
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 35
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: Oilers06
Hyman only wanted to go to the Oilers, dont think this would have even been a possibility. He left money on the table to come to Edmonton


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lindholm has never hit the UFA market, he just turned 27 3 weeks ago


This is a Hindsight posting and looking at how 2 player swaps could transform a average to below average team into a playoff contender.
I get neither player would have signed with us and both weren't REAL options for the sharks.
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 36
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Kane is a good hockey player, he was the best player on the Sharks last year. Nobody has the clairvoyance needed to see the current issues that have surrounded him


he had some past issues but things were great with the sharks when we resigned him. so I agree fully this is just showing how 2 choices could change a team.
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,751
Mentions "j'aime": 20,464
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
This is a Hindsight posting and looking at how 2 player swaps could transform a average to below average team into a playoff contender.
I get neither player would have signed with us and both weren't REAL options for the sharks.


The issue with the whole options thing around Lindholm is Calgary traded for him then signed him as an RFA before he even played a single game for the Flames. Nobody thought he was going to be the player he is now
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 56
#9
Simpleton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,365
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
The issue with the whole options thing around Lindholm is Calgary traded for him then signed him as an RFA before he even played a single game for the Flames. Nobody thought he was going to be the player he is now


Yep, that was a great move.
22 déc. 2021 à 20 h 40
#10
I make typos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 5,335
Mentions "j'aime": 5,010
if the Oilers do that they never get another free agent every again
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage