SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just a thought

Créé par: Jah1722
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 11 nov. 2021
Publié: 11 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
SEA has one NHL RHD. Ducks could use a RHW if they trade Rakell.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $60 159 583 $0 $3 415 000 $21 340 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 nov. 2021 à 1 h 59
#1
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Donskoi is worth more then a 3rd pairing Dman imo
11 nov. 2021 à 23 h 21
#2
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
I dont care how good the team looks rn this is a rebuilding year. We should avoid lateral moves like this imo. But I 100% agree on needing a RHW.

Edit: Not saying this is equal value but Donskoi is reaching 30. We need to target the 21-24 age range. Like Girard for example.
11 nov. 2021 à 23 h 30
#3
Démarrer sujet
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,901
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
I dont care how good the team looks rn this is a rebuilding year. We should avoid lateral moves like this imo. But I 100% agree on needing a RHW.

Edit: Not saying this is equal value but Donskoi is reaching 30. We need to target the 21-24 age range. Like Girard for example.


Tell me how this affects the rebuild at all?
11 nov. 2021 à 23 h 49
#4
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: Jah1722
Tell me how this affects the rebuild at all?


Just rather have Shattenkirk be flipped for picks or prospects at the deadline. Dont see the team ready to be bonfire contenders or in the position to acquire 30 yo wingers.
11 nov. 2021 à 23 h 55
#5
Démarrer sujet
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,901
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
Just rather have Shattenkirk be flipped for picks or prospects at the deadline. Dont see the team ready to be bonfire contenders or in the position to acquire 30 yo wingers.


They don’t need to be bonafide contenders to make a lateral move that doesn’t affect the rebuild. Being competitive to the end of the season will only help the rebuild. Getting young players that experience will help in the long run.
12 nov. 2021 à 0 h 13
#6
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: Jah1722
They don’t need to be bonafide contenders to make a lateral move that doesn’t affect the rebuild. Being competitive to the end of the season will only help the rebuild. Getting young players that experience will help in the long run.


if getting young players in the system that experience playing with veterans is the main priority(Which I'm cool and agree with) maybe we should keep Shat. RHD is very valuable for us rn and Shat has played great this season. Moreover, this trade doesnt happen without us adding imo. We aren't in a position to lose assets. But, like ive said I would love to add a RHW.
12 nov. 2021 à 0 h 15
#7
Démarrer sujet
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,901
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
if getting young players in the system that experience playing with veterans is the main priority(Which I'm cool and agree with) maybe we should keep Shat. RHD is very valuable for us rn and Shat has played great this season. Moreover, this trade doesnt happen without us adding imo. We aren't in a position to lose assets. But, like ive said I would love to add a RHW.


Shattenkirk is awful if you ignore his point total. He’s gotten most of those on the PP too.
BuckoJoyde a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2021 à 0 h 26
#8
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: Jah1722
Shattenkirk is awful if you ignore his point total. He’s gotten most of those on the PP too.


Ok. I'll definitely need to revaulate my thoughts on Shattenkirk especially in regard to his 5v5 play. But, our PP was an all-time worse last year and I do think his production this year is valuable regardless of his shortcomings shown through his GF% for example.
12 nov. 2021 à 0 h 47
#9
Démarrer sujet
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,420
Mentions "j'aime": 2,901
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
Ok. I'll definitely need to revaulate my thoughts on Shattenkirk especially in regard to his 5v5 play. But, our PP was an all-time worse last year and I do think his production this year is valuable regardless of his shortcomings shown through his GF% for example.


Last 3 goals against tonight he had a big hand in. Didn’t pick up McCann in front of the net just puck watching and 2 awful pinches in a 2-goal lead that lead to odd man rushes. Mahura didn’t help him with his defending but still.

I just was looking for RHW options and Donskoi and Shattenkirk’s contracts are the same. Plus SEA has one RHD. If they find a taker for any decent price they should move him.
BuckoJoyde a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage