SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just send it

Créé par: El_Dub
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 nov. 2021
Publié: 2 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Last kick at the can with this management group. Can haggle on draft picks as required
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Crouse, Lawson (766 666 $ retained)
  2. Kessel, Phil (3 400 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Klingberg, John (2 125 000 $ retained)
DAL
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $78 929 783 $0 $400 000 $2 570 217 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
766 667 $766 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 nov. 2021 à 18 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,924
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Kessel should get better than that at 50%
2 nov. 2021 à 18 h 6
#2
Démarrer sujet
El_Dub
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Kessel should get better than that at 50%


Ok. A 1st and a 2nd it is. Don't care
2 nov. 2021 à 18 h 6
#3
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,568
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
If Klingberg says that there is a -% chance that he resigns and the Stars are in last place in the league then they might accept that
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
2 nov. 2021 à 18 h 8
#4
Démarrer sujet
El_Dub
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: imawesome
If Klingberg says that there is a -% chance that he resigns and the Stars are in last place in the league then they might accept that


Or if the stars are going to miss the playoffs, he goes for a playoff run and then resigns with the stars in the offseason. Don't care
2 nov. 2021 à 20 h 40
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Add Liljegren and another high end pick/prospect
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2021 à 8 h 21
#6
Démarrer sujet
El_Dub
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Add Liljegren and another high end pick/prospect


For a rental Klingberg? Not interested
3 nov. 2021 à 10 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Quoting: El_Dub
For a rental Klingberg? Not interested


Why would we sell him as a rental? We can sign him and move him before his new deal starts
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2021 à 19 h 9
#8
Démarrer sujet
El_Dub
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Why would we sell him as a rental? We can sign him and move him before his new deal starts


In theory, yes you could. In realty, you will not. It will be either a new deal negotiated and keep him or they sell him as a rental
3 nov. 2021 à 20 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Quoting: El_Dub
In theory, yes you could. In realty, you will not. It will be either a new deal negotiated and keep him or they sell him as a rental


Then Nill should be fired for not getting full value for him. Did Columbus trade Jones as a rental? Sure didn’t
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
4 nov. 2021 à 13 h 0
#10
Démarrer sujet
El_Dub
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Then Nill should be fired for not getting full value for him. Did Columbus trade Jones as a rental? Sure didn’t


I am not sure why trading a player as a rental is a fireable offense... Its up to the club trading for the player whether they want/can extend him or if they just use him as a rental.

For example, Chicago traded for Jones with only 1 year remaining on his current contract (this is called a rental) and then Chicago extended him. Had Chicago not extended him, Jarmo Kekäläinen should have been fired... Ya, that checks out
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 17
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Quoting: El_Dub
I am not sure why trading a player as a rental is a fireable offense... Its up to the club trading for the player whether they want/can extend him or if they just use him as a rental.

For example, Chicago traded for Jones with only 1 year remaining on his current contract (this is called a rental) and then Chicago extended him. Had Chicago not extended him, Jarmo Kekäläinen should have been fired... Ya, that checks out


Lol. Do you really think Chicago paid that much to get him if they didn’t already have an extension negotiated?? GMs allow other teams to talk to the players before hand so they can get maximum value. The extension comes after the trade because it has to not because it was negotiated after. Your thought process that we would trade Klinger to you for rental price assumes none of the other teams in the league would pay full price with a contract negotiated ahead of time. Unlikely but hey whatever works for you
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
8 nov. 2021 à 9 h 18
#12
Démarrer sujet
El_Dub
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Lol. Do you really think Chicago paid that much to get him if they didn’t already have an extension negotiated?? GMs allow other teams to talk to the players before hand so they can get maximum value. The extension comes after the trade because it has to not because it was negotiated after. Your thought process that we would trade Klinger to you for rental price assumes none of the other teams in the league would pay full price with a contract negotiated ahead of time. Unlikely but hey whatever works for you


All I am saying is that a lot of players get traded at the deadline without a negotiated extension in place. Yes, you could possibly get more if a team wants to trade more assets to get the player they can sign for 8 years but in the vast majority of cases, many teams will keep more of their prized assets and just sign the player for 7 years a couple months down the road...

Many times in those extensions, it is for a team that the player already wants to play for. For Seth Jones, he made it clear that there were only a couple teams that he would be willing to sign an extension with. The team willing to pay the most and the team the player wants to play for are also not always the same... Since Klingberg doesn't have a NTC/NMC, he can be traded to literally any team in the league
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage