SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chicago blockbuster

Créé par: SadlyAnOilFan
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 25 oct. 2021
Publié: 25 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Has anyone floated this before?

I like it because it’s an equal money, equal term deal (2@2yr vs 1@4yr). Some will probably argue Chicago adds because of the age difference, but I think it’s balanced by the large amount of salary eaten by Chicago.

IMO this adds the depth Toronto needs and gives Chicago another skilled young piece with term.

I’m probably going to get roasted for this, but tell me your thoughts.
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Kane, Patrick (4 847 000 $ retained)
  2. Toews, Jonathan (5 250 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Pick to balance out the deal a bit. Maybe there’s performance conditions surrounding Toews because he’s pretty rusty at the moment. Upgrades to a 2nd or 1st if…
CHI
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 513 116 $0 $400 000 $7 986 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-2 222 000 $-2 222 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 oct. 2021 à 22 h 30
#1
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
TOR would have to add here. But honestly its not a bad idea....

However I have to say this. We should be trying to run Mitch out of town. He actually played fine today. I think we should target someone like Pavelski and ship Holl and Engvall to Russia
SadlyAnOilFan a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2021 à 22 h 32
#2
Im here to party
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 827
Mentions "j'aime": 198
this might be one of the dumbest trades ive ever seen on this website lol. 2 players x 2 year does not equal 1 player at 4 years, let alone the retention of salary, plus the fact that kane and toews bring waaaaay more to the table than a single mitch marner
25 oct. 2021 à 22 h 35
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 661
Mentions "j'aime": 321
Quoting: tylerstenson
this might be one of the dumbest trades ive ever seen on this website lol. 2 players x 2 year does not equal 1 player at 4 years, let alone the retention of salary, plus the fact that kane and toews bring waaaaay more to the table than a single mitch marner


Okay, maybe I went a little too far appeasing leafs fans. What do you think Toronto would have to give going the other way?
25 oct. 2021 à 22 h 37
#4
Im here to party
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 827
Mentions "j'aime": 198
Quoting: SadlyAnOilFan
Okay, maybe I went a little too far appeasing leafs fans. What do you think Toronto would have to give going the other way?


firstly ill say, I dont think theres any scenario that involves Kane and Toews being moved at this time. Maybe next year at deadline if they are truly out of it, and the guys want to chase another cup. If it were to happen, I struggle to see what the Hawks would even want back from the leafs, especially knowing how valuable 10M of retention is. Would be one of the biggest trade hauls of all time.
SadlyAnOilFan a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2021 à 22 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 661
Mentions "j'aime": 321
Quoting: tylerstenson
firstly ill say, I dont think theres any scenario that involves Kane and Toews being moved at this time. Maybe next year at deadline if they are truly out of it, and the guys want to chase another cup. If it were to happen, I struggle to see what the Hawks would even want back from the leafs, especially knowing how valuable 10M of retention is. Would be one of the biggest trade hauls of all time.


Yeah part of the reason I thought of this was trying to figure out what Chicago is trying to do. I was thinking Trading toews and Kane by this deadline may return the assets do a quick retool and come out the other side while Jones still has some good (ish lol) contract years left.

Again though, you are right in saying they’d need more than just Mitch Marner to pull it off.
25 oct. 2021 à 23 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
So basically $22M in cap hit for Marner? Come on, Chicago won't take Marner's straight up cap hit let alone add to it with retention.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2021 à 23 h 49
#7
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,650
Mentions "j'aime": 9,778
Quoting: ChiHawk
So basically $22M in cap hit for Marner? Come on, Chicago won't take Marner's straight up cap hit let alone add to it with retention.


IDK man. I struggle with this because it's a half a$$ attempt at a rebuild. Marner is good. He's going to make sure the Hawks will never get a true shot at a top 3 pick, but they'll also be between 8 and 12 every year. It's exactly what CHI doesn't want, but it's at least interesting.
25 oct. 2021 à 23 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: exo2769
IDK man. I struggle with this because it's a half a$$ attempt at a rebuild. Marner is good. He's going to make sure the Hawks will never get a true shot at a top 3 pick, but they'll also be between 8 and 12 every year. It's exactly what CHI doesn't want, but it's at least interesting.


Still would cost the Hawks $23M (not $22M) for the first 2 years for Marner (and he he isn't going to not only meet Toews + Kane's production but then put up another $11M to justify hiimself) and then you have 2 years left at $11M and he's a free agent; just doesn't make sense from a financial perspective. If the Hawks had a supporting cast then maybe.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage