SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mikheyev Experiment

Créé par: Janasazi
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 oct. 2021
Publié: 9 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Mikheyev got hurt in the last pre-season game.

Since a lot of people have been criticizing his viability as a player, we have the option to do an actual scientific explanation.

If we put Mikheyev on LTIR and the team is genuinely better. It could mean that trading him won't significantly hurt the team because we can see how the team behaves without him.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 363 116 $0 $400 000 $136 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 oct. 2021 à 20 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,035
For it to be a good experiment you would need a sample size of him with the team during the regular season.
Janasazi a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 20 h 35
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: Byrr
For it to be a good experiment you would need a sample size of him with the team during the regular season.


That's a great point but I didn't say it was a perfect experiment. We can always compare it to his preseason play but I don't think people are gonna be convinced with that.
Byrr a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 20 h 36
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,524
Mentions "j'aime": 22,679
It does give the Leafs short term cap relief. But there isn't any reason to believe that Engvall, or Ritchie maybe even Bunting are "better" wingers. Plus doubt if Kerfoot stays at LW full time during the season.
Mikheyev may be traded for cap reasons, but he worth his contract.
Janasazi a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 20 h 41
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: palhal
It does give the Leafs short term cap relief. But there isn't any reason to believe that Engvall, or Ritchie maybe even Bunting are "better" wingers. Plus doubt if Kerfoot stays at LW full time during the season.
Mikheyev may be traded for cap reasons, but he worth his contract.


I think Engvall, Ritchie and Bunting have been great in the preseason but you're right that this can quickly change when the actual season starts.

For Kerfoot, he hasn't really been good in the center spot but I think he's a good keep for a worst case scenario if/when something happens to Matthews or Tavares and we need a viable 2C.
9 oct. 2021 à 20 h 45
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,524
Mentions "j'aime": 22,679
Quoting: Janasazi
I think Engvall, Ritchie and Bunting have been great in the preseason but you're right that this can quickly change when the actual season starts.

For Kerfoot, he hasn't really been good in the center spot but I think he's a good keep for a worst case scenario if/when something happens to Matthews or Tavares and we need a viable 2C.


Kerfoot has been fine at 3C...although he and line mates had hands of stone last season. But so many Leafs fans think Kerfoot is bad at centre but seem quite happy to put one goal last season Kampf at centre and Spezza who hasn't played centre much in years as a solution..
9 oct. 2021 à 21 h 3
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: palhal
Kerfoot has been fine at 3C...although he and line mates had hands of stone last season. But so many Leafs fans think Kerfoot is bad at centre but seem quite happy to put one goal last season Kampf at centre and Spezza who hasn't played centre much in years as a solution..


I think the main reason we got Kampf was his defensive ability and I hear he's good at winning faceoffs in the defensive zone.

I agree with you about Kerfoot's linemates, they definitely didn't help.
9 oct. 2021 à 22 h 41
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,524
Mentions "j'aime": 22,679
Quoting: Janasazi
I think the main reason we got Kampf was his defensive ability and I hear he's good at winning faceoffs in the defensive zone.

I agree with you about Kerfoot's linemates, they definitely didn't help.


Kerfoot is not a good face guy. I wonder why? Gee, just spend an hour a day during the summer practicing. Kampf will play a lot when the Leafs have a lead and the PK. But to depend on Kampf and Spezza as 3/4C is really iff, and if Matthews or Tavares get hurt, Kerfoot seems the their only replacement.
Janasazi a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage