SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks at the deadline

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 3 août 2021
Publié: 3 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Assuming the hawks are buying at the deadline.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
I am sure the ducks are interested in resigning Lindholm, but with the defense market demanding 9 million + for above-average D men they may look to trade him at the deadline if they cant agree to an extension.
ANA
  1. Beaudin, Nicolas
  2. Strome, Dylan
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Since the hawks don't have a first-round pick this year (Still sigh) they will likely have to beat out teams that do have that asset still available. Perhaps the ducks will look to more immediate assets that will help to accelerate their rebuild.

Nicolas Beaudin: I think it's possible Nic Beaudin can be a solid defenseman in the NHL as soon as next season. In this scenario, he has not carved out a spot on the hawks and would likely be a prime candidate to be traded.

Strome: Still young, but his future in Chicago is questionable at best. A change of scenery could do him good, but who knows.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $62 445 325 $452 439 $2 532 500 $19 054 675 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
102 778 $102 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $ (2 375 000 $$2M2 375 000 $$2M)
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 août 2021 à 17 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 214
Mentions "j'aime": 121
There’s a first and a second out there for a retained Lindholm (additional conditional pick if he signs or gets flipped) Sorry dude.
3 août 2021 à 17 h 45
#2
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Quoting: Edmund0
There’s a first and a second out there for a retained Lindholm (additional conditional pick if he signs or gets flipped) Sorry dude.


You can't do conditional pick for resigning anymore, and Anaheim is getting a lot for a player that can walk in FA.
3 août 2021 à 17 h 52
#3
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Idk I think the hawk should keep Beaudin. He looked good last season with the hawks, and now since Boqvist has been dealt, I think the Blackhawks could use a puck moving defensemen.
3 août 2021 à 17 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 214
Mentions "j'aime": 121
Quoting: Beetlejuice
You can't do conditional pick for resigning anymore, and Anaheim is getting a lot for a player that can walk in FA.


Wow I don’t know that. That’s good to know. Thx
3 août 2021 à 18 h 9
#5
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,723
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Feels like an overpayment tbh
JackBurton a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 19 h 49
#6
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,026
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: Edmund0
There’s a first and a second out there for a retained Lindholm (additional conditional pick if he signs or gets flipped) Sorry dude.


Source on this? Because that seems... very unlikely.
4 août 2021 à 8 h 56
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Modifié 4 août 2021 à 9 h 6
I'd prefer Mitchell over Beaudin. No need for another LD prospect. Zellweger, Thrun and LaCombe are all very good prospects and it doesn't make much sense to have another one on the Ducks best position (right now and in terms of prospects). Fowler, Zellweger, Thrun, LaCombe, Beaudin (and maybe even Benoit) would create quite the logjam at LD in a couple of years.

I would want more value in general. Ristolainen is a comparable deal imo. Both UFA's next summer and look what Buffalo got for him. Lindholm is far better and it's not even close. Ducks probably decline.
4 août 2021 à 9 h 25
#8
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,858
Quoting: TZ11
I'd prefer Mitchell over Beaudin. No need for another LD prospect. Zellweger, Thrun and LaCombe are all very good prospects and it doesn't make much sense to have another one on the Ducks best position (right now and in terms of prospects). Fowler, Zellweger, Thrun, LaCombe, Beaudin (and maybe even Benoit) would create quite the logjam at LD in a couple of years.

I would want more value in general. Ristolainen is a comparable deal imo. Both UFA's next summer and look what Buffalo got for him. Lindholm is far better and it's not even close. Ducks probably decline.


The difference between Risto and Lindholm in this scenario is when they were traded. To get a comparable deal you would have needed to trade him at the draft.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage