NateElder12
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 5,736
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Howard no way.
1. He has term left on his contract at an awful cap hit.
2. He is hurt/older
3. He isn't being traded to be the #1 goalie of the future for anyone
The Jones reference can't be applied because Jones was 6 years younger, was an expiring RFA contract, and was needed on the team. Plus SJS was in the playoffs so that pick was going to be a late 1st rounder. Winnipeg would be essentially giving up a sure fire top 10 pick for Jimmy Howard. Come on..