SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rumor on the Street

Créé par: HolyShildt
Équipe: 2021-22 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 19 juill. 2021
Publié: 19 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Rumor of the day is that Seattle is going to pick Tarasenko and flip him to Philly.
Odds are Landeskog is gonna get 9 million in the open market, and the blues shouldn't cave in on that much money for that much term. Much rather them sign a player who is nearly as good for roughly 4 million less in Tatar (He's criminally underrated). Use the extra money saved by dumping Scandella and not signing Gabe to grab a perfect linemate for either Parayko or Faulk in Alec Martinez. Resign Bozak and Schwartz, and you got yourself some more bang for your buck.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 150 000 $
22 500 000 $
22 100 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
11 350 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
STL
    Pure cap dump for the blues similar to the Ladd to Arizona deal. Doesn't have to be Ottawa, but some rebuilding team with cap space that would be willing to weaponize their cap space for future assets
    OTT
    1. Scandella, Marco
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (STL)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (STL)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de DET
    2022
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    2023
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2581 500 000 $75 618 849 $306 349 $0 $5 881 151 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    787 500 $787 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    19 juill. 2021 à 4 h 10
    #1
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,647
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,476
    Tatar isn't criminally underrated. The guy routinely gets benched in the playoffs, and then his team usually runs ot the finals without him.
    19 juill. 2021 à 5 h 11
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 251
    Mentions "j'aime": 39
    I don't get trading assets to get rid of Scandella just to over pay Sanford, run a 25 person team roster, pick up Tatar and Martinez for more than you should pay him and overpay Schwartz again. This team would not produce anymore offense than last season, I'd argue it would be worse.
    19 juill. 2021 à 6 h 25
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
    If true that's what Seattle will do, shame on Armstrong. Most overrated GM in the league
    19 juill. 2021 à 8 h 29
    #4
    Sicarius
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 1,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 214
    Schwartz sucks
    19 juill. 2021 à 14 h 11
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 55
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Tatar isn't criminally underrated. The guy routinely gets benched in the playoffs, and then his team usually runs ot the finals without him.


    In the last 3 years, Tatar leads the league in 5v5 expected goal %, is 9th in the league in 5v5 assists, and 19th in 5v5 points. He is going to be the steal of the offseason if a team gets him for a sub 5 AAV
    19 juill. 2021 à 14 h 15
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 55
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: Chopper02
    If true that's what Seattle will do, shame on Armstrong. Most overrated GM in the league


    The rumor also stated that the Kraken were going to be willing to retain a decent portion of that contract. While it would be rough to not gain assets in return, unloading that contract while being able to keep Dunn very well could work in the blues favor. As long as Army uses the cap space wisely, they can work with the extra 7.5 million compared to half of that if they wanted a good return
    19 juill. 2021 à 14 h 31
    #7
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,647
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,476
    Quoting: HolyShildt
    In the last 3 years, Tatar leads the league in 5v5 expected goal %, is 9th in the league in 5v5 assists, and 19th in 5v5 points. He is going to be the steal of the offseason if a team gets him for a sub 5 AAV


    Heh. Yeah, he's really good in the regular season and has played with some really strong defensive forwards as linemates. Now ask yourself how many teams have benched him in the playoffs...
    19 juill. 2021 à 14 h 59
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
    Quoting: HolyShildt
    The rumor also stated that the Kraken were going to be willing to retain a decent portion of that contract. While it would be rough to not gain assets in return, unloading that contract while being able to keep Dunn very well could work in the blues favor. As long as Army uses the cap space wisely, they can work with the extra 7.5 million compared to half of that if they wanted a good return


    He could have gotten something of value other than cap space. If he wanted to open up cap space he shouldn't have signed Krug or Faulk and would have just kept Petro. Army gets in his own way because he's stubborn.
    19 juill. 2021 à 15 h 32
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 55
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: Chopper02
    He could have gotten something of value other than cap space. If he wanted to open up cap space he shouldn't have signed Krug or Faulk and would have just kept Petro. Army gets in his own way because he's stubborn.


    I can agree with Krug, but Faulk is making his contract look fine. The Scandella signing was BAD though
    19 juill. 2021 à 17 h 33
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
    Quoting: HolyShildt
    I can agree with Krug, but Faulk is making his contract look fine. The Scandella signing was BAD though


    Faulk is overpaid. He played well last year, no doubt, but is vastly overpaid. Especially in the context that for 8 mil we could have had Petro who can do the jobs of both Krug and Faulk who are getting paid 13 mil to do together. I agree the Scandella contract was bad too though.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage