SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ok I kinda like this

Créé par: FunMustBeAlways
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 4 juill. 2021
Publié: 14 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
2793 167 $
2750 000 $
1815 000 $
2780 000 $
1775 000 $
11 356 400 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
53 450 000 $
33 125 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Kase, Ondrej1 356 400 $Aucune compensation
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Juulsen, Noah [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Chris Driedger’s signing rights
FLA
  1. Jaros, Christian [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (COL)
2.
SJS
    Expansion Draft selection
    3.
    SJS
    1. Berdin, Mikhail
    2. Harkins, Jansen
    3. Niku, Sami
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
    Détails additionnels:
    Trade proposed by @Feelers4Ehlers. I edited it a bit, but it is very similar to the original trade proposal.

    (Trade also happens after the expansion draft)
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $63 924 930 $0 $425 000 $17 575 070 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    1 356 400 $1 356 400 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    815 000 $815 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    793 167 $793 167 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    14 juill. 2021 à 1 h 5
    #1
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,709
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
    Too much on Labanc imo.

    Kase is a wild shout though. I like it.
    14 juill. 2021 à 1 h 13
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 602
    Mentions "j'aime": 232
    I like what you're thinking re: the offer sheet for Kase and sending Labanc to Winnipeg.

    I'm concerned that Driedger is going to be Scott Darling 2: Electric Boogaloo though. He was able to perform largely due to Weegar, Forsling, and Ekblad (prior to his injury) in front and I'm concerned about paying that much for him given the trouble our defensemen had last season. Moreover, we could easily land a proven starter like Mrazek or Ullmark for just a bit more so I think it'll be worth our while to spend a bit extra for a proven commodity (even if Driedger is one of the more exciting FA targets).

    Also, curious about your decision to bury Jones in the minors than outright buying him out, since a buyout will save us more in cap space.
    14 juill. 2021 à 2 h 7
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,219
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Too much on Labanc imo.

    Kase is a wild shout though. I like it.


    Labanc trade wasn’t my idea as I said, but a Jets fan made it and I liked it. Better value than Labanc for Kerfoot and a 3rd lol

    And yeah Kase could be a sneaky good signing if he can stay healthy. He’s really good at both ends of the ice 5 v. 5
    14 juill. 2021 à 2 h 25
    #4
    oh how i suffer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 852
    Mentions "j'aime": 332
    Not sure how Wenny would do with our coaching staff, but frankly I'd rather have him and find a better coach squinting with tongue out
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2021 à 2 h 59
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,219
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
    Quoting: areax91
    I like what you're thinking re: the offer sheet for Kase and sending Labanc to Winnipeg.

    I'm concerned that Driedger is going to be Scott Darling 2: Electric Boogaloo though. He was able to perform largely due to Weegar, Forsling, and Ekblad (prior to his injury) in front and I'm concerned about paying that much for him given the trouble our defensemen had last season. Moreover, we could easily land a proven starter like Mrazek or Ullmark for just a bit more so I think it'll be worth our while to spend a bit extra for a proven commodity (even if Driedger is one of the more exciting FA targets).

    Also, curious about your decision to bury Jones in the minors than outright buying him out, since a buyout will save us more in cap space.


    I get your reservations about Driedger and with the amount of games he’s played it is a bit of a gamble. But with Ullmarks injuries and Mrazek’s sorta inconsistent play I’d say they’re risk in both of them as well. Both Ullmark and Mrazek are around average in terms of stats. There’s nothing wrong with average, but with Driedger, he could still very well pan out to be a well-above average tendy. I think that’s a fine risk to take. With that being said, Ullmark and Mrazek are next on my list as well though so if it was one of them, I’d have no problems.

    Oh and with Jones, my thought process is just: If you aren't in dire need of the cap space buying him out will provide, just bury him. It is more sustainable in the long term, and doable with some smart investments in the short term.
    areax91 et ASharksFan a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2021 à 3 h 7
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,219
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
    Quoting: bunnymcfoo
    Not sure how Wenny would do with our coaching staff, but frankly I'd rather have him and find a better coach squinting with tongue out


    I'm trying to convince myself that there's still a chance for Bob to not suck, but my gut feeling is telling me to prepare for the worst regarding coaching next season. cry
    areax91 et bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2021 à 6 h 13
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,089
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,274
    Modifié 14 juill. 2021 à 6 h 54
    I can't see this being a front burner trade idea for the Jets. The glaring need is on defence and if the Jets are going to spend some quality assets -- 1st, Harkins, Berdin; though Niku is expendable -- they should first look to spend those kind of assets (plus a roster player) in some sort of package for a top 4 D as opposed to forwards. In terms of a trade for defense, I don't think the Jets and Sharks are good trade partners.
    Windjammer a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2021 à 18 h 59
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,219
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
    Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
    I can't see this being a front burner trade idea for the Jets. The glaring need is on defence and if the Jets are going to spend some quality assets -- 1st, Harkins, Berdin; though Niku is expendable -- they should first look to spend those kind of assets (plus a roster player) in some sort of package for a top 4 D as opposed to forwards. In terms of a trade for defense, I don't think the Jets and Sharks are good trade partners.


    Yeah I definitely understand. Like I mentioned, I just saw the trade and liked it. Guys like Berdin and Harkins aren't integral at all, so if they were breaking points, I wouldn't have a problem taking them out.

    And I mean, Simek could be available if you consider him a top-4 defenseman? (although a defense-only one) But I doubt a player of his caliber is what the Jets are looking for.

    But yeah if it's not a trade that makes sense for the Jets in terms of addressing their needs, then it's just probably not gonna happen.
    Mr_Canoehead a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2021 à 21 h 40
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,089
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,274
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Yeah I definitely understand. Like I mentioned, I just saw the trade and liked it. Guys like Berdin and Harkins aren't integral at all, so if they were breaking points, I wouldn't have a problem taking them out.

    And I mean, Simek could be available if you consider him a top-4 defenseman? (although a defense-only one) But I doubt a player of his caliber is what the Jets are looking for.

    But yeah if it's not a trade that makes sense for the Jets in terms of addressing their needs, then it's just probably not gonna happen.


    I didn't watch many Sharks game this season so I don't have a view on Simek. In terms of Jets prospects/picks, I suspect all but Perfetti and Heinola are likely available for the right return, as the Jets have 3 years of Scheifele and Hellebuyck on good contracts so the team shouldn't squander that opportunity.
    15 juill. 2021 à 1 h 13
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,219
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
    Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
    I didn't watch many Sharks game this season so I don't have a view on Simek. In terms of Jets prospects/picks, I suspect all but Perfetti and Heinola are likely available for the right return, as the Jets have 3 years of Scheifele and Hellebuyck on good contracts so the team shouldn't squander that opportunity.


    I mean Simek is fine to be honest. He kind of strikes me as a Jan Rutta type where he’s maybe a #4 defenseman at most on his own but if you throw him with the right partner (like maybe Pionk or Morissey) he could thrive. Like Hedman-Rutta, Simek did his best on the left side while playing with Burns a year and a half ago.

    Simek is reportedly on the block so he wouldn’t cost much I don’t think. I like him but I dunno if he’s high-end enough for Winnipeg.

    And yeah Perfetti and Heinola should be 100% untouchable lol
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage