Forums/Armchair-GM

How far off

Créé par: KANYE_IS_KING
Date de création initiale: 3 juill. 2021
Publié: 3 juill. 2021
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Batherson, Drake54 250 000 $
Tkachuk, Brady87 000 000 $
Dermott, Travis2900 000 $
Patrick, Nolan2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Coleman, Blake24 000 000 $
Martinez, Alec25 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
TOR
  1. 2022 4e round pick (OTT)
2.
OTT
  1. Beagle, Jay
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. 2021 1e round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Paul, Nicholas
3.
OTT
    SEA
    1. Tierney, Chris
    4.
    OTT
    1. Frost, Morgan
    2. Patrick, Nolan [Droits de RFA]
    PHI
    1. Zub, Artem
    2. Brown, Logan [Droits de RFA]
    3. 2022 3e round pick (OTT)
    Rachats de contrats
    • Bobby Ryan: 3 583 333 $
    • Dion Phaneuf: 354 167 $
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    • Nicholas Paul: 600 750 $ (45%)
    ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
    2021
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    2022
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de SJS
    2023
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NSH
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $73 589 916 $0 $4 225 000 $7 910 084 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de OTT
    Tkachuk, Brady
    7 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de OTT
    Norris, Joshua
    925 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de OTT
    Batherson, Drake
    4 250 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de OTT
    Stützle, Tim
    925 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de OTT
    White, Colin
    4 750 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de OTT
    Brown, Connor
    3 600 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Coleman, Blake
    4 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de PHI
    Frost, Morgan
    863 333 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de OTT
    Dadonov, Evgeni
    5 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de OTT
    Watson, Austin
    1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de VAN
    Beagle, Jay
    3 000 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Patrick, Nolan
    950 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de OTT
    Chabot, Thomas
    8 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de OTT
    Brännström, Erik
    863 333 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de OTT
    Murray, Matt
    6 250 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Martinez, Alec
    5 000 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de OTT
    Zaitsev, Nikita
    4 500 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de OTT
    Forsberg, Anton
    900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Dermott, Travis
    900 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de OTT
    Bernard-Docker, Jacob
    925 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de VAN
    Eriksson, Loui
    6 000 000 $ (4 875 000 $)
    AG, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de OTT
    Brown, Joshua
    1 200 000 $ (75 000 $)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de OTT
    Pinto, Shane
    925 000 $ (0 $)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de OTT
    Formenton, Alex
    747 500 $ (0 $)
    AG
    RFA - 1

    Unités spéciales

    Avantage numérique 1
    Tkachuk, B.
    Norris, J.
    Batherson, D.
    Stützle, T.
    Brännström, E.
    Avantage numérique 2
    Brown, C.
    Frost, M.
    Patrick, N.
    Chabot, T.
    Dadonov, E.
    Infériorité numérique 1
    Coleman, B.
    Beagle, J.
    Martinez, A.
    Zaitsev, N.
    Infériorité numérique 2
    White, C.
    Brown, C.
    Dermott, T.
    Bernard-Docker, J.

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 20
    #26
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 7,568
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,758
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    Youre all over the map here. Who cares what they already have? Should tampa trade point for a 3rd bc they already have kucherov stamkos cirelli hedman and vasilevskiy? Passing up on the prime of johnson/mctavish/lysell/sillinger to move cap for 1 year where youre not going to go anywhere significant is just stupid.


    Considering Tampa is 18M over the cap, I figure that moving a strong player on their roster for peanuts is the only option that they really have. Johnson is likely going to Seattle, Killorn is likely to be moved, but then they still have 9M to juggle to get under the cap.

    I'm just saying that a weak Pacific makes it more likely for Vancouver to succeed. They have the depth at Wing to where a prospect that they draft won't be roster ready.
    They could use the money to bring in Morgan Reilly, or Taylor Hall etc etc. They could very well be a strong playoff contender in 2021/22 if they make a couple of moves.
    You also want to show the players you are serious in competing. I don't know if a constant retool is what players want to be a part of.
    4 juill. 2021 à 11 h 48
    #27
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 3,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,059
    Quoting: jmac490
    Considering Tampa is 18M over the cap, I figure that moving a strong player on their roster for peanuts is the only option that they really have. Johnson is likely going to Seattle, Killorn is likely to be moved, but then they still have 9M to juggle to get under the cap.

    I'm just saying that a weak Pacific makes it more likely for Vancouver to succeed. They have the depth at Wing to where a prospect that they draft won't be roster ready.
    They could use the money to bring in Morgan Reilly, or Taylor Hall etc etc. They could very well be a strong playoff contender in 2021/22 if they make a couple of moves.
    You also want to show the players you are serious in competing. I don't know if a constant retool is what players want to be a part of.


    Its not a constant retool you have to be a little patient, its a process. If you do make this deal its a constant retool bc they wont be good enough to get over the hump but they wont have any more young talent in the pipeline.
    4 juill. 2021 à 12 h 8
    #28
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 7,568
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,758
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    Its not a constant retool you have to be a little patient, its a process. If you do make this deal its a constant retool bc they wont be good enough to get over the hump but they wont have any more young talent in the pipeline.


    The Canucks have been fiddling with the roster for years. They thought Eriksson/Roussel/Sutter etc were going to get them over the hump, and they didn't live up to expectations. The Canucks need more in their bottom 6, since they are struggling a bit in that category.
    Gadjovich/Podkolzin/Lind could help their depth tremendously. Moving money allocated in bad contracts could help them bolster their bottom 6 to succeed a little better. Heck they could do Chris Tierney for 2021 1st/Eriksson/Beagle if they wanted. Tierney has been a great help on the development of Batherson/Stutzle and could do the same for Podkolzin/Lind. Then they can sign other depth to be successful.
    I would rather them try to compete now, rather than a few years down the road when Petey/Hughes are off their bridge deals.
    4 juill. 2021 à 12 h 15
    #29
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 3,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,059
    Quoting: jmac490
    The Canucks have been fiddling with the roster for years. They thought Eriksson/Roussel/Sutter etc were going to get them over the hump, and they didn't live up to expectations. The Canucks need more in their bottom 6, since they are struggling a bit in that category.
    Gadjovich/Podkolzin/Lind could help their depth tremendously. Moving money allocated in bad contracts could help them bolster their bottom 6 to succeed a little better. Heck they could do Chris Tierney for 2021 1st/Eriksson/Beagle if they wanted. Tierney has been a great help on the development of Batherson/Stutzle and could do the same for Podkolzin/Lind. Then they can sign other depth to be successful.
    I would rather them try to compete now, rather than a few years down the road when Petey/Hughes are off their bridge deals.


    Its literally 1 more year before those contracts are gone for free and if you want tierney so bad trade a 3rd for him (thats what ive seen as the going rate). Why are you moving 9 OA when theres no need.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Supprimer une option
    Soumettre le sondage