SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who Wins - Team A vs B

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 1 juill. 2021
Publié: 1 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
81500000 cap max for both teams - 1 elc at F and D (no elc goalie)
*no injuries
*I believe they’re just about 1m > apart but cap compliant
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
27999 999 999 $125 628 142 $0 $4 737 500 $874 371 857 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 838 362 $1 838 362 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Who Wins Game 7 SCF?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


1 juill. 2021 à 15 h 9
#1
Your deal is bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 860
Mentions "j'aime": 530
Team A better: Line 1, Line 3, 3rd pair, Starter
Team B better: Line 2, Line 4, 2nd pair
Equal: 1st pair, Backup

They are pretty even, but I would take Team A
yikes a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 15 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Team B is a lot better. Also interesting that the top 2 players are on 1 team.
1 juill. 2021 à 15 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Team B
1 juill. 2021 à 15 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Quoting: OnlyBadDeals
Team A better: Line 1, Line 3, 3rd pair, Starter
Team B better: Line 2, Line 4, 2nd pair
Equal: 1st pair, Backup

They are pretty even, but I would take Team A


Team B's first line has the two best players in the world on it and you still think A's first line is better? what are you on?
yikes a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 16 h 15
#5
Your deal is bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 860
Mentions "j'aime": 530
Quoting: Wadejos123
Team B's first line has the two best players in the world on it and you still think A's first line is better? what are you on?


I think the step down from Huberdeau to Kane is big enough to offset the gap between the other two players in the line. I will say I am lower on Kane than most people, like a lot lower. I'm also biased towards Huberdeau, he is my 3rd favorite non-Cane
1 juill. 2021 à 16 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,072
Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
Quoting: Wadejos123
Team B's first line has the two best players in the world on it and you still think A's first line is better? what are you on?



Quoting: Islesforthecup
Team B is a lot better. Also interesting that the top 2 players are on 1 team.


As to why I felt they’re even from my opinion;

Matthews Huberdeau and Point could keep up - Matthews and Huberdeau are close to McDavid MacDog but behind obviously, but Point has shown in the regular season he’s phenomenal plus in the playoffs he’s been a consistent monster. Making the gap up mightly and evening it up I’d say. 4 franchise players plus Kane who’s a near elite top 6 (not elite tho) and then Point is performing a near franchise.
I like Huberdeau play making for the scorer matthews and points a net presence and speedy winger. I think it makes a even matchup.
OnlyBadDeals a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 18 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: yikes
As to why I felt they’re even from my opinion;

Matthews Huberdeau and Point could keep up - Matthews and Huberdeau are close to McDavid MacDog but behind obviously, but Point has shown in the regular season he’s phenomenal plus in the playoffs he’s been a consistent monster. Making the gap up mightly and evening it up I’d say. 4 franchise players plus Kane who’s a near elite top 6 (not elite tho) and then Point is performing a near franchise.
I like Huberdeau play making for the scorer matthews and points a net presence and speedy winger. I think it makes a even matchup.


Ill go through it 1 by 1.
Line 1.
Mcdavid over matthews
Mackinnon over point
Huberdeau over kane

Line 2.
Barzal over mika
Tkachuk over hertl
Pavelski over greenway

Line 3.
Horvat over zacha
Roslovic over kunin
Smith over crouse

Line 4.
Norris over vilardi
Foligno equals puljujarvi
Blais over barabanov

Pair 1.
Klingberg over tanev
Toews over girard

Pair 2.
Ekholm ? Cernak
Dobson over byram (rn dobsons the better player)

Pair 3.
Lindgren over chiarot
Zub over gudas

Starter
Varlamov equals lehner (way too close to call)

Backup
Blackwood over campbell

By my score thats mcdavid-13 matthews-4 and ties-3 mcdavid has 3x what matthews has plus going 4-2 in top 6, 3-0-1 in the top 4, and 1-0-1 in net.
1 juill. 2021 à 18 h 36
#8
Démarrer sujet
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,072
Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Ill go through it 1 by 1.
Line 1.
Mcdavid over matthews
Mackinnon over point
Huberdeau over kane

Line 2.
Barzal over mika
Tkachuk over hertl
Pavelski over greenway

Line 3.
Horvat over zacha
Roslovic over kunin
Smith over crouse

Line 4.
Norris over vilardi
Foligno equals puljujarvi
Blais over barabanov

Pair 1.
Klingberg over tanev
Toews over girard

Pair 2.
Ekholm ? Cernak
Dobson over byram (rn dobsons the better player)

Pair 3.
Lindgren over chiarot
Zub over gudas

Starter
Varlamov equals lehner (way too close to call)

Backup
Blackwood over campbell

By my score thats mcdavid-13 matthews-4 and ties-3 mcdavid has 3x what matthews has plus going 4-2 in top 6, 3-0-1 in the top 4, and 1-0-1 in net.


Line 2 and Line 3 def were where the lines that needed the biggest adjustments. Just gave line 3 for Matthews Horvat which him alone could be a huge difference maker but yeah there’s def a bigger swing too McDavid in that middle 9 tho I would say it’s Girard vs Klingberg which is close and then Tanev vs Toews which is also close (tanev was fantastic D wise) but Girard did have a great year.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage