SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tarasenko

Créé par: Jiannuccilli
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 29 juin 2021
Publié: 29 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 700 000 $
22 300 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
36 200 000 $
14 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
15 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 400 000 $
Transactions
1.
STL
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Kase, Ondrej [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Moore, John
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 054 841 $1 956 507 $182 500 $4 445 159 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 200 000 $6 200 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juin 2021 à 15 h 44
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Seems like a lot to give up for a guy that’s been a shell of himself, but i kinda like the concept, especially if you shore up the D, ditch ritchie, and put together a decent fourth line.
29 juin 2021 à 16 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Seems like a lot to give up for a guy that’s been a shell of himself, but i kinda like the concept, especially if you shore up the D, ditch ritchie, and put together a decent fourth line.


Yeah I honestly wasn’t too sure what the value on tarasenko would be, he’s still been elite when on the ice but injuries have plagued him the last 2 years. I might’ve overpaid but when making a team I’d prefer to overpay than underpay on a guy.

I’d argue that the D and 4th line in this would be pretty good, lazar was the life of the 4th line and Kuhlman looked effective when he played, the question mark is Frederic.

For the defense, Merrill analytically was in the 99th percentile for even strength defense last year, they were missing a true left handed shutdown defensemen and I think he can greatly fill that need. bringing Reilly back is a must, he fit perfectly with carlo.

I was kinda going back and forth on ritchie. He had a decent regular season, I think getting him back for 2.3 could be a bargain, but worst case scenario it’s only a 2 year deal so they could find a way to move him next offseason. 1x2.3 for a bottom 6 forward shouldn’t be hard to find a taker
29 juin 2021 à 16 h 8
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Jiannuccilli
Yeah I honestly wasn’t too sure what the value on tarasenko would be, he’s still been elite when on the ice but injuries have plagued him the last 2 years. I might’ve overpaid but when making a team I’d prefer to overpay than underpay on a guy.

I’d argue that the D and 4th line in this would be pretty good, lazar was the life of the 4th line and Kuhlman looked effective when he played, the question mark is Frederic.

For the defense, Merrill analytically was in the 99th percentile for even strength defense last year, they were missing a true left handed shutdown defensemen and I think he can greatly fill that need. bringing Reilly back is a must, he fit perfectly with carlo.

I was kinda going back and forth on ritchie. He had a decent regular season, I think getting him back for 2.3 could be a bargain, but worst case scenario it’s only a 2 year deal so they could find a way to move him next offseason. 1x2.3 for a bottom 6 forward shouldn’t be hard to find a taker


On Tarasenko: I get that, but i mean, he’s a sniper that’s scored 7 goals in the last two seasons. That’s just tough to put much value on. If STL wanted to grab a first rounder and move on from him, I think it’s an interesting concept. If they want to eat 50%, and go for real value, I also think it’s an interesting concept.

4th line: that 4th line stinks out loud, and it’s mostly because of Kuhlman. I just don’t see the appeal, and he definitely isn’t a LW. Bring back Kuraly. Simple, easy, effective.

D: don’t care about the analytics when it comes to d men. Literally zero. That D is thin, and still lacks the shut down guy. Reilly would be better suited for third pair (and that contract is too much). You could find better than Merrill, and then throw them up with Carlo.

Ritchie is not an NHL hockey player. He is flat out horrible. Whats worse, he’s lazy. Lazy players can’t be counted on to buy into the system. It was a major lapse of judgment to dress him in the playoffs, and it may have cost them a chance to play against tampa. Don’t qualify, don’t mess with him, just see ya later. I would be pissed if they brought him back at league min.
29 juin 2021 à 16 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
I mean, Kase can just be thrown out. Bruins won't qualify him neither do the Blues.
If Boston were the destination my proposal would be:

DeBrusk + Frederic + 3rd for Tarasenko. Pick can be upgraded if Blues retain.
29 juin 2021 à 16 h 15
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
On Tarasenko: I get that, but i mean, he’s a sniper that’s scored 7 goals in the last two seasons. That’s just tough to put much value on. If STL wanted to grab a first rounder and move on from him, I think it’s an interesting concept. If they want to eat 50%, and go for real value, I also think it’s an interesting concept.

4th line: that 4th line stinks out loud, and it’s mostly because of Kuhlman. I just don’t see the appeal, and he definitely isn’t a LW. Bring back Kuraly. Simple, easy, effective.

D: don’t care about the analytics when it comes to d men. Literally zero. That D is thin, and still lacks the shut down guy. Reilly would be better suited for third pair (and that contract is too much). You could find better than Merrill, and then throw them up with Carlo.

Ritchie is not an NHL hockey player. He is flat out horrible. Whats worse, he’s lazy. Lazy players can’t be counted on to buy into the system. It was a major lapse of judgment to dress him in the playoffs, and it may have cost them a chance to play against tampa. Don’t qualify, don’t mess with him, just see ya later. I would be pissed if they brought him back at league min.


I get the feelings about ritchie, it just seems that they like him too much to let him go, I tried to incorporate a little bit of what I think will happen (they bring him back) plus what I want to happen (tarasenko).

We’ll have to disagree on Kuhlman, I thought kuraly sucked last year, but now that I think about it my reasoning for them brining back ritchie is probably the same reason that they’ll bring back kuraly, my preference was kuhlman but if kuraly can have a resurgence then sure.

On merril, I don’t think they’ll find someone better for that value, he’s always been a pure shutdown D and they already get plenty of offense from McAvoy grizz and Reilly. Reilly I can see getting as low as 2.5, he did have 31 assists so they won’t get him back for pennies. I know points isn’t the best way to evaluate players, but it does get them paid regardless.
29 juin 2021 à 16 h 18
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Jiannuccilli
I get the feelings about ritchie, it just seems that they like him too much to let him go, I tried to incorporate a little bit of what I think will happen (they bring him back) plus what I want to happen (tarasenko).

We’ll have to disagree on Kuhlman, I thought kuraly sucked last year, but now that I think about it my reasoning for them brining back ritchie is probably the same reason that they’ll bring back kuraly, my preference was kuhlman but if kuraly can have a resurgence then sure.

On merril, I don’t think they’ll find someone better for that value, he’s always been a pure shutdown D and they already get plenty of offense from McAvoy grizz and Reilly. Reilly I can see getting as low as 2.5, he did have 31 assists so they won’t get him back for pennies. I know points isn’t the best way to evaluate players, but it does get them paid regardless.


If you’re judging players off last year more heavily than on the last few years, i think you’re going about it wrong. Shortened off-season, shortened season, no pre-season. Just doesn’t make sense to make judgments off of that.
29 juin 2021 à 16 h 24
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
If you’re judging players off last year more heavily than on the last few years, i think you’re going about it wrong. Shortened off-season, shortened season, no pre-season. Just doesn’t make sense to make judgments off of that.


Good point. I use that same logic when people try to completely write off Debrusk. I still think he can be moved for a more consistent, more talented forward (or some good picks, I’ve had some AGMs with him getting traded for 2nd + 3rd). I still think it could be beneficial to move him, but he’s also not this worthless offensive black hole that people think he is now
30 juin 2021 à 12 h 5
#8
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,048
Mentions "j'aime": 1,100
Quoting: Chopper02
I mean, Kase can just be thrown out. Bruins won't qualify him neither do the Blues.
If Boston were the destination my proposal would be:

DeBrusk + Frederic + 3rd for Tarasenko. Pick can be upgraded if Blues retain.




Replace Freddy with a pick or Ritchie or something else and you got a deal. I wanna keep Freddy
pastrnak_is_my_dad a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2021 à 12 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: Dekes
Replace Freddy with a pick or Ritchie or something else and you got a deal. I wanna keep Freddy


If you want to change Freddy to a 1st then sure. Change him to a 1st. Blues don't want Ritchie
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage