SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane back home to Vancouver

Créé par: kanish
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 juin 2021
Publié: 25 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
21 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2950 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Beagle, Jay
  2. DiPietro, Michael
  3. Eriksson, Loui
  4. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Taking on bad contracts to add value for the rebuild
2.
SJS
  1. Kähkönen, Kaapo
  2. Khovanov, Alexander
  3. Rask, Victor
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Hertl, Tomas (2 812 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
SEA
  1. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $61 987 000 $0 $1 465 000 $19 513 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 30
#1
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,190
Mentions "j'aime": 3,654
Vancouver should pass. It’s too much to give up imo. Just wait out the one year of bad contracts and keep the assets
Radu47 et audiodave a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 30
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,652
Mentions "j'aime": 936
Quoting: The_Rocket
Vancouver should pass. It’s too much to give up imo. Just wait out the one year of bad contracts and keep the assets


It’s like people forget that kane had 49 points in 56 games
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,652
Mentions "j'aime": 936
Kane plays up to his contract
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 32
#4
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,190
Mentions "j'aime": 3,654
Quoting: Letsgosharks
It’s like people forget that kane had 49 points in 56 games


It’s like people forget Kane has a 7 million dollar cap hit till 2025
Radu47 et audiodave a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,652
Mentions "j'aime": 936
Quoting: The_Rocket
It’s like people forget Kane has a 7 million dollar cap hit till 2025


And if he plays like he did last year that’s a good deal. He’s only 29
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 36
#6
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,190
Mentions "j'aime": 3,654
Quoting: Letsgosharks
And if he plays like he did last year that’s a good deal. He’s only 29


Way too high risk of a contract for the Canucks right now. I’m sure some team out there would be willing but Vancouver giving up 3 good futures to bring in some one older than the rest of their core? They already have aging high cap players in Schmidt and Myers. Don’t need another one
Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 39
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,652
Mentions "j'aime": 936
Quoting: The_Rocket
Way too high risk of a contract for the Canucks right now. I’m sure some team out there would be willing but Vancouver giving up 3 good futures to bring in some one older than the rest of their core? They already have aging high cap players in Schmidt and Myers. Don’t need another one


Fair enough. I just think kane could get a first + another asset without having to take on a bad contract.
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 56
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 837
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: Letsgosharks
Fair enough. I just think kane could get a first + another asset without having to take on a bad contract.


Fair POV. From an outsider's perspective I don't agree. Kane is 30 by the time next season starts, that contract can age badly, quickly. Plus he is so volatile that I barely think he is worth 7mil when he is firing on all cylinders. If Kane were making 5ish mil and only had a couple more years left on the deal then I think you get a 1st+
Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2021 à 14 h 58
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,652
Mentions "j'aime": 936
Quoting: qwertymann
Fair POV. From an outsider's perspective I don't agree. Kane is 30 by the time next season starts, that contract can age badly, quickly. Plus he is so volatile that I barely think he is worth 7mil when he is firing on all cylinders. If Kane were making 5ish mil and only had a couple more years left on the deal then I think you get a 1st+


Yeah just watching him last year he was the best player on the ice for the sharks most of the season. If he ended up actually being traded to van which who knows how likely that is and was out with a center like Peterson who knows how good kane could play
25 juin 2021 à 15 h 2
#10
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Quoting: Letsgosharks
And if he plays like he did last year that’s a good deal. He’s only 29


Exactly on cue for a decline 😃

~30 is exactly when the curve starts to tail off

Granted moreso a slope than a cliff but

Okposo, Neal, Lucic, Eriksson, etc. cliff examples

With Ekane so good so young too it likely comes early
25 juin 2021 à 15 h 5
#11
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Quoting: The_Rocket
It’s like people forget Kane has a 7 million dollar cap hit till 2025


Yeah that deal is like a never ending cycle of bad money and especially tough as the Sharks could easily retain... no chance they're contending before 2025
25 juin 2021 à 15 h 7
#12
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
I bet Minnesota go for that with KK being part of a goalie protection quagmire in ways + them getting excited about being a contender for the 1st time ever

Why not go all in for once

Like the boring accountant going skydiving
25 juin 2021 à 15 h 8
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,652
Mentions "j'aime": 936
Quoting: Radu47
Yeah that deal is like a never ending cycle of bad money and especially tough as the Sharks could easily retain... no chance they're contending before 2025


I don’t really think the kane deal is really part of the reason the sharks won’t contend until 2025 if that’s what ur getting at
25 juin 2021 à 17 h 32
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Radu47
I bet Minnesota go for that with KK being part of a goalie protection quagmire in ways + them getting excited about being a contender for the 1st time ever

Why not go all in for once

Like the boring accountant going skydiving



He's their G of the future.
Clement a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage