I think I've yet to say this about a Leafs team on here, but this is actually a very sensible AGM. I think you can do better than Galchenyuk, but all around I think this is pretty realistic as what the leafs could hope to do.

I don't disagree, aside from the whole 20 man roster thing.

Very fair. More realistically, shave off a few 100k here or there to fit in Adam Brooks as the extra skater.

Can’t see the leafs losing Holl and moving Lilly. Dvorak would be a much cheaper target. Would be a good fit on the top line with marner.

Not saying i agree with this, but i think Armstrong would value Dvorak more than Garland. Ability to play C, long term cost certainty. Armstrong won't want to cave and sign Garland long-term at a higher price point. For the Leafs, makes more sense within their window to sign Garland short term at a lower AAV. For Garland, also makes sense. try and inflate his numbers playing top 6 minutes and sign his big deal in 2-3 years time.

my only concern with any leaf trade involving Garland is giving him big money. ..for what 1 year? kinda risky if you ask me to give him 5 mil

Keep Holl and let Foligno walk Seattle takes kerfoot I don’t thin Arizona will want to take on any money