SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3C options and depth

Créé par: bdb
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2021
Publié: 18 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think this team improves without committing long term salary. Adds players who add to the young core but sacrifices some high picks in this years draft which IMO is a bigger crapshoot than normal.

Either Zacha or Dickenson could be 3C but I see Zacha as having a bit more offensive upside after his break out season so fitting better with Bo. I think Dickenson is likely the better of the two long term.

Despite breaking out Zacha still has some question marks about whether he is a legit top 6 player. Moving into the top 10 is a significant asset and think taking back a bit of Salary in Roussel and moving the 28-31 pick seems reasonable.

The Dickinson move allows Dallas to get a good asset and decent prospect for a player they would either lose for free or pay to keep.

Hagg isn't anything special but he adds physicality and can be solid on the 3rd pair. Phi gets a vet back up for 3M and an NHL ready prospect with some upside still.

Raanta might be a little underpaid but hard to tell what his value will be after a sub par season with more injuries, additional cap space available to tweak salary range.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 800 000 $
56 000 000 $
37 000 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
32 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Holtby, Braden (1 300 000 $ retained)
  2. Juolevi, Olli [Droits de RFA]
2.
VAN
  1. Dickinson, Jason [Droits de RFA]
DAL
  1. Costmar, Arvid [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. Zacha, Pavel
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
NJD
  1. Roussel, Antoine
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 550 659 $648 780 $1 900 000 $3 949 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 35
#1
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,993
Mentions "j'aime": 26,490
Devils aren't trading Zacha
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 37
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Moving 20 spots to get another top 10 pick isn't enough or he is just too important to this team?
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,611
Mentions "j'aime": 19,714
Take out the Isles pick
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 40
#4
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,333
Mentions "j'aime": 3,691
Not moving the 9th for 3C
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Perhaps swap for devils 2nd but sorry Zacha isn't worth that much. Jury is still out if he's even a top 6 player. 9th OA is pretty significant piece.

This NJ writer seems to be suggesting 2021 Zacha was a mirage. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.allaboutthejersey.com/platform/amp/2021/4/7/22368895/trouble-beneath-the-surface-of-pavel-zachas-breakout-season-with-the-devils

While I'm not sure he's as bad as the analytics suggest, he's hardly worth a top 10 pick alone.
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 47
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: The_Rocket
Not moving the 9th for 3C


Definitely a risk, but it's a 3C/2LW and high first for the 9th.
18 juin 2021 à 15 h 51
#7
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,685
Mentions "j'aime": 3,070
Instead of Dickinson, I'll trade you Faksa straight up for a 2nd
18 juin 2021 à 16 h 1
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: TheMooterus
Instead of Dickinson, I'll trade you Faksa straight up for a 2nd


Faksa is a good target as well but I would prefer staying away from that contract.
18 juin 2021 à 16 h 4
#9
down bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 1,450
justoffer Washington a 2nd for Eller...he put up similar numbers to EK
18 juin 2021 à 16 h 13
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: DogDayCaps2
justoffer Washington a 2nd for Eller...he put up similar numbers to EK


EK?

I like Eller but at 32 and soon to be UFA, moving the 2nd is short sighted. Faksa at 27 and 3 more years or Dickenson as an RFA makes more sense for where the nucks are at could see a team like EDM moving a 2nd for eller as they are in more win now mode.
18 juin 2021 à 16 h 25
#11
down bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 1,450
Quoting: bdb
EK?

I like Eller but at 32 and soon to be UFA, moving the 2nd is short sighted. Falsa at 27 and 3 more years or Dickenson as an RFA makes more sense for where the nucks are at could see a team like EDM moving a 2nd for eller as they are in more win now mode.


Vancouver had a bad year but i think adding a cup winning center that puts up great numbers playing with little talent around him would be great add. Eller is much better than Dickinson and Faksa. regardless of age i would take the better player
18 juin 2021 à 16 h 59
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 221
Quoting: bdb
Perhaps swap for devils 2nd but sorry Zacha isn't worth that much. Jury is still out if he's even a top 6 player. 9th OA is pretty significant piece.

This NJ writer seems to be suggesting 2021 Zacha was a mirage. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.allaboutthejersey.com/platform/amp/2021/4/7/22368895/trouble-beneath-the-surface-of-pavel-zachas-breakout-season-with-the-devils

While I'm not sure he's as bad as the analytics suggest, he's hardly worth a top 10 pick alone.


I do believe the point is more so that Roussel has to be a cap dump. I do think the Devils need to take on Eriksson's contract to give VAN cap freedom in addition to a Roussel or a Beagle.
As a Devil fan, Zacha actually is not a center anymore, he's a wing. I wasn't a big fan of his, but I'll give credit where due, he was solid on the Nico-Bratt line to end the year.

The discussion is more likely around Wood who put up 17 goals from the 4th line and brings speed but is behind a bunch of LWs.
18 juin 2021 à 17 h 7
#13
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,054
Mentions "j'aime": 4,395
Devils take that and run. Zacha is an overvalued commodity.
18 juin 2021 à 19 h 11
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: RebelCoach
I do believe the point is more so that Roussel has to be a cap dump. I do think the Devils need to take on Eriksson's contract to give VAN cap freedom in addition to a Roussel or a Beagle.
As a Devil fan, Zacha actually is not a center anymore, he's a wing. I wasn't a big fan of his, but I'll give credit where due, he was solid on the Nico-Bratt line to end the year.

The discussion is more likely around Wood who put up 17 goals from the 4th line and brings speed but is behind a bunch of LWs.


Wood could be there as well but I figured Zacha still has the higher upside. I agree Zacha projects more as a winger but would still give Van options.
18 juin 2021 à 20 h 48
#15
I like to hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 390
Mentions "j'aime": 215
I think another one of the top defenseman in the draft (preferably Clarke) needs to be available for NJ to make that trade, otherwise it’s pretty poor asset management. They severely need defensive help and need to get that if they are trading their two most valuable and expendable assets.

I expect one or both of those pieces to be moved to grab a defenseman prior to the expansion draft and if they can’t then it’s probably better to hold onto your pieces and see if zacha can be the player he showed flashes of being last season with a consistent line.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage