SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canes 21-22 Forsberg

Créé par: vikhodush
Équipe: 2021-22 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2021
Publié: 14 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Likely not realistic because I’m assuming forsberg wants to re-sign with Preds and they want to re-sign him as well. But this would be a great addition to Carolina and I think it would be the perfect fit. Not sure about the value in the trade but willing to tweak it.

If they did trade for him, assuming he’d get something like a 6x8M extension - going to do a part two for the 22-23 season to see how that plays out with rest of team.

Barrie would be a good replacement to play with Slavin, not sure if that deal is realistic so feel free to weigh in.

Oleksiak brings some size and stability to third pair. Could try Keane out there as Hjalmerson is coming back (honestly not sure about that one). Detroit gas cap space for Gardiner and he’d be serviceable over there if we send a pick with him.

Think Armia would be a great scoop and fit for this team - how’s the contract?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
26 000 000 $
23 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
22 300 000 $
23 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
25 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
23 500 000 $
12 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
  1. Fast, Jesper
  2. Foegele, Warren [Droits de RFA]
  3. Geekie, Morgan [Droits de RFA]
  4. Suzuki, Ryan
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
2.
CAR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (DET)
DET
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
3.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de ANA
Logo de DET
Logo de CAR
Logo de CBJ
2023
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 282 749 $0 $620 000 $217 251 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
That's WAY too much to give up for someone who's a rental, and he is a rental because Carolina won't have the space to re-sign him with both Trocheck and Nino needing new deals.
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 24
#2
Your deal is bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 860
Mentions "j'aime": 530
If we are giving up that much, an extension has to already be in place
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 103
I'm not a fan of either team, but that is way too much for Filip Forsberg.
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 39
#4
Canes fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 4,475
Mentions "j'aime": 4,578
We're not giving that much for Forsberg. Don't get me wrong here, he'd be a nice add for sure. But since Forsberg will probably want more on his next contract and we are in a bit of a cap crunch here, he would likely end up being just a rental, and I am NOT taking a rental for that price.
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 41
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Caniac2000
That's WAY too much to give up for someone who's a rental, and he is a rental because Carolina won't have the space to re-sign him with both Trocheck and Nino needing new deals.


I’m not seeing it as a rental. Posted a part 2 where I played the extension out following season. Let troch and Nino go essentially.
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: OnlyBadDeals
If we are giving up that much, an extension has to already be in place


Yep it is - I should’ve made that clearer in description. Check out part 2 where I played out extension in following season.
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 42
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Dzinger18
We're not giving that much for Forsberg. Don't get me wrong here, he'd be a nice add for sure. But since Forsberg will probably want more on his next contract and we are in a bit of a cap crunch here, he would likely end up being just a rental, and I am NOT taking a rental for that price.


Definitely should’ve been more clear in description - this is an extension play. Check out my part 2.
Zinger a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 14 h 48
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: vikhodush
I’m not seeing it as a rental. Posted a part 2 where I played the extension out following season. Let troch and Nino go essentially.


Letting Trocheck go is comical. He's been the 2nd best player on the roster during his short stint here. Any recommendation that they let him go is straight-up laughable.
14 juin 2021 à 14 h 52
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Caniac2000
Letting Trocheck go is comical. He's been the 2nd best player on the roster during his short stint here. Any recommendation that they let him go is straight-up laughable.


He’s been great but I’d assume he wants a big pay day. Would rather not overpay when Necas can and will develop into the 2C of the future. Can improve at another area and still be solid up the middle.
14 juin 2021 à 14 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: vikhodush
Assuming he wants one more big deal as he comes out of his prime I’d rather not overpay. Necas can develop into a 2C or you can find a short term replacement while he does at a reasonable cap hit. That being said if he’s willing to stay on a more team friendly deal then sure go ahead and give him a new deal. Overpaying players on new deals for prior performance is how teams get in trouble.


Necas won't move over, his dominance on the wing has become more too valuable. He's better suited to being the right-shot winger of the top 6. Paying for Trocheck is the priority, moving for a rental like Forsberg right makes no sense.
14 juin 2021 à 14 h 55
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Caniac2000
Necas won't move over, his dominance on the wing has become more too valuable. He's better suited to being the right-shot winger of the top 6. Paying for Trocheck is the priority, moving for a rental like Forsberg right makes no sense.


Like I put in the description and in multiple responses. It’s not a rental.
14 juin 2021 à 14 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: vikhodush
Like I put in the description and in multiple responses. It’s not a rental.


It's a rental, because you do not prioritise signing a winger over a center. Trocheck would be re-signed before Forsberg. If you can only pick 1, you take Trocheck over Forsberg which makes him... A RENTAL!
14 juin 2021 à 14 h 59
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Caniac2000
It's a rental, because you do not prioritise signing a winger over a center. Trocheck would be re-signed before Forsberg. If you can only pick 1, you take Trocheck over Forsberg which makes him... A RENTAL!


It’s not a rental if it’s a sign and trade, chief. Which as I stated, it is. Have your opinion over who is more valuable or should be prioritized but twisting things around doesn’t change facts.
14 juin 2021 à 16 h 30
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: vikhodush
It’s not a rental if it’s a sign and trade, chief. Which as I stated, it is. Have your opinion over who is more valuable or should be prioritized but twisting things around doesn’t change facts.


Simply do a better job of setting up your team! Perhaps don't let the teams 2nd highest scorer walk away!
14 juin 2021 à 17 h 13
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Caniac2000
Simply do a better job of setting up your team! Perhaps don't let the teams 2nd highest scorer walk away!


Nah I’m good. This is a very good team. Thanks for your input.
14 juin 2021 à 17 h 20
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: vikhodush
Nah I’m good. This is a very good team. Thanks for your input.


Yes a team with no 2C is a good team sure!
14 juin 2021 à 17 h 21
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: Caniac2000
Yes a team with no 2C is a good team sure!


Yep this team is very good thanks for coming over to my side!
14 juin 2021 à 17 h 39
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,588
Mentions "j'aime": 6,728
Quoting: Caniac2000
Simply do a better job of setting up your team! Perhaps don't let the teams 2nd highest scorer walk away!


Yo this is his version of the team. Not yours. Lol
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 17 h 41
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: F50marco
Yo this is his version of the team. Not yours. Lol


Haha thx bro - it’s all good he’s entitled to his opinion. Just don’t get why he’s so obsessed about a hypothetical in a forum like this where ppl just get creative. I’ve seen a lot of the same old versions and figured this one would be a fun different option
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage