SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens - Ducks MegaDeal - Enough

Créé par: PensGM2019
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2021
Publié: 14 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Comtois, Maxime [Droits de RFA]
  2. Gibson, John
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Guentzel, Jake
  2. Jarry, Tristan
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
2.
3.
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Riikola, Juuso
Détails additionnels:
Somewhere for a 7th.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de DAL
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 856 364 $0 $212 500 $1 643 636 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 44
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Why would the Ducks do this?
Salzy et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 45
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 594
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Lenny7
Why would the Ducks do this?


Just thinking out loud. This wouldn't be the final package as pieces would need to be added. Thoughts here though are Ducks get a proven winger in Jake and younger goalie (since they are rebuilding/younger) and Pens get proven goalie and a younger winger.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 48
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: PensGM2019
Just thinking out loud. This wouldn't be the final package as pieces would need to be added. Thoughts here though are Ducks get a proven winger in Jake and younger goalie (since they are rebuilding/younger) and Pens get proven goalie and a younger winger.


If the Ducks *were* to trade Gibby, it'd be for pick(s)/prospect(s)/young NHLers, not guys that will be entering their 30's when the team *should* be competitive again. They're not trading young NHLers/prospects like Comtois right now. It wouldn't make any sense. They're rebuilding.
Salzy et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 594
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Lenny7
If the Ducks *were* to trade Gibby, it'd be for pick(s)/prospect(s)/young NHLers, not guys that will be entering their 30's when the team *should* be competitive again. They're not trading young NHLers/prospects like Comtois right now. It wouldn't make any sense. They're rebuilding.


Ok fair enough. Thanks for the Ducks perspective on this one.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 8
I would think the ducks want younger pieces. The kings could want Jake for kempe (Play with geno) and one of their C's (Vilardi?- Once LAK get Eichel!).
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 594
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Igloo
I would think the ducks want younger pieces. The kings could want Jake for kempe (Play with geno) and one of their C's (Vilardi?- Once LAK get Eichel!).


I saw the Kings wanted a top six winger but I don't know if the package we could get from them really helps our team get bigger. I'm ok moving Jake (post expansion draft) if we can acquire a gritty skilled guy. Kind of similar to the Hornqvist for Neal move couple years back. We had too many skilled guys like Neal and no Patric's so it worked out. What I don't want though is to trade Jake than in exp. draft lose MCann cause than our LW is super weak.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 53
#7
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: PensGM2019
Ok fair enough. Thanks for the Ducks perspective on this one.


Cheers. I get the "Gibby to Pittsburgh" thing, because he's from Pitt, but I just don't think the Pens have the type of pieces that Anaheim would need to be getting back.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 55
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 594
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Lenny7
Cheers. I get the "Gibby to Pittsburgh" thing, because he's from Pitt, but I just don't think the Pens have the type of pieces that Anaheim would need to be getting back.


Yeah I agree. I also am not 100% sold on the fact that Jarry can't be the guy for us. The Isles may just have been the better team as we see they are in the finals and up 1-0 in series. What I really want is what I said in previous post. The Pens have technically three Jake's in Zucker/MCann/Jake on the LW. I want a change up on the wings which might mean moving Jake or Zucker. I like the idea of one of them in the expansion draft but we will protect Jake due to higher trade value. I also am not a big fan of UFA's out there this year.
14 juin 2021 à 13 h 6
#9
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: PensGM2019
Yeah I agree. I also am not 100% sold on the fact that Jarry can't be the guy for us. The Isles may just have been the better team as we see they are in the finals and up 1-0 in series. What I really want is what I said in previous post. The Pens have technically three Jake's in Zucker/MCann/Jake on the LW. I want a change up on the wings which might mean moving Jake or Zucker. I like the idea of one of them in the expansion draft but we will protect Jake due to higher trade value. I also am not a big fan of UFA's out there this year.


Yeah...I think Rakell might be the only real option wing-wise from Anaheim, but he's just a rental and GMBM will likely have a high pricetag on him, whether he earns it or not.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage