SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Baby Steps

Créé par: Aussie_Blackhawk
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2021
Publié: 14 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hinostroza gets picked up on better money elsewhere for this example.

Hand the Keys to Kirby.

Instead of the regular UFA signings of Saad etc, traded for Tuch who is younger, Good Cap and Term, Big Body and skates well whilst giving VGK Centre Depth a LD Prospect ready for NHL time and their 3rd back for 2022. It gives them the opportunity to gain these assets and then go and sign a Saad of their own.

Defence hasn't improved much but Baby steps required and further development on our D is needed.

Draft Day: (if both available)
11OA take Lysell
17OA take Lambos

Gives us capacity for next year to go after an UFA in the D.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 300 000 $
31 200 000 $
43 500 000 $
1900 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lysell, Fabian
3925 000 $
Lambos, Carson
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
VGK
  1. Beaudin, Nicolas
  2. Suter, Pius [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Seems Fair Value or overpay tbh.
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Nylander, Alexander
  2. Strome, Dylan (1 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
WPG gets C and wing Support. Can add if need but thought retention would suffice.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 519 343 $452 439 $5 390 000 $14 980 657 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance307 500 $$308K)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
866 667 $866 667 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin 2021 à 3 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 108
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Why give up on Suter and Beaudin already?
IconicHawk a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 7 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,175
Mentions "j'aime": 2,343
If the Jets are spending draft capital, it should be on defense and not on forwards. Absent any good deals, they would likely take Lambos at 17OA if available.
Aussie_Blackhawk et Windjammer a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2021 à 11 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,003
Mentions "j'aime": 399
Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
If the Jets are spending draft capital, it should be on defense and not on forwards. Absent any good deals, they would likely take Lambos at 17OA if available.


And Lambos is a Winnipeg kid
14 juin 2021 à 11 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,175
Mentions "j'aime": 2,343
Quoting: njlaf705
And Lambos is a Winnipeg kid


Cool. I knew he played for the Ice but I didn't know he was actually from Winnipeg.
14 juin 2021 à 12 h 29
#5
VGKNation702
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 5,211
Mentions "j'aime": 1,667
While both prospects look promising, that’s a backwards move for Vegas. Moving Tuch just isn’t going to happen. I said it all last year, and I’ll keep saying it. He’s our only forward under 30 worth a damn. Krebs could be really nice but he hasn’t scored a goal yet. Tuch is locked up until we have tons of room to pay him FIVE years from now. It just doesn’t make any sense to a team that’s competing to trade away their young studs
14 juin 2021 à 18 h 59
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: MaltePalte
Why give up on Suter and Beaudin already?


The trade was based on selling Suter while value is high for Tuch who is a big body forward who can play top 6 now and sign RNH to play the centre role.

Quoting: VGKNation702
While both prospects look promising, that’s a backwards move for Vegas. Moving Tuch just isn’t going to happen. I said it all last year, and I’ll keep saying it. He’s our only forward under 30 worth a damn. Krebs could be really nice but he hasn’t scored a goal yet. Tuch is locked up until we have tons of room to pay him FIVE years from now. It just doesn’t make any sense to a team that’s competing to trade away their young studs


Yeah, his cap is great for his production. A real asset and the main reason for this ACGM. It would be tough to give up Tuch but the ideology behind this scenario was for you guys to sign a guy like Saad to replace him whilst receiving 2 good prospects with NHL experience, Suter was actually on track for 40 points in a regular season in his rookie year.
14 juin 2021 à 19 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,209
Mentions "j'aime": 7,211
Winnipeg isn't giving up a 1st for a couple forwards they don't really need, especially when one will be an RFA looking for a large raise that they don't have the cap space for.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage