SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2022

Créé par: A123
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 8 juin 2021
Publié: 8 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
54 500 000 $
1750 000 $
34 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
1750 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (2 000 000 $ retained)
2.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $77 966 783 $0 $0 $3 533 217 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,590
Mentions "j'aime": 19,709
That Sabres trade is a joke right?
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 36
#2
Démarrer sujet
Come on
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 155
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
That Sabres trade is a joke right?


Everything with the leafs is a joke lol
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,590
Mentions "j'aime": 19,709
Quoting: A123
Everything with the leafs is a joke lol


Touche?
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
Come on
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 155
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Buff gets term and most money has been paid.
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 1,030
Oh that Sabres trade is BAAAAD.
Kerfoot is a negative player that is vastly overpaid while Marner is not equal to Jack in trade value...
If you took Reinhart out you still likely wouldn't have a deal.
RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 56
#6
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Chapee44
Oh that Sabres trade is BAAAAD.
Kerfoot is a negative player that is vastly overpaid while Marner is not equal to Jack in trade value...
If you took Reinhart out you still likely wouldn't have a deal.


Kerfoot isn’t overpaid lol. If he was overpaid why is Seattle plan to take him in the expansion draft? He wasn’t given a top 6 role. He places to be a shutdown centre which he wasn’t.
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 57
#7
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Kerfoot isn’t overpaid lol. If he was overpaid why is Seattle plan to take him in the expansion draft? He wasn’t given a top 6 role. He places to be a shutdown centre which he wasn’t.


Not saying I agree with the trade I think the value is way in Toronto favour and Kevin Adams would be dumb to take the deal.
8 juin 2021 à 21 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 1,030
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Kerfoot isn’t overpaid lol. If he was overpaid why is Seattle plan to take him in the expansion draft? He wasn’t given a top 6 role. He places to be a shutdown centre which he wasn’t.


I actually think Seattle will workout a deal and take Hyman personally. Either that or Dermott. Seattle is being built on analytics with arguably the best team of analysts we've ever seen in the NHL. With Meghan Chayka high up in the organization they won't be making dumb decisions like Kerfoot.
8 juin 2021 à 22 h 7
#9
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Chapee44
I actually think Seattle will workout a deal and take Hyman personally. Either that or Dermott. Seattle is being built on analytics with arguably the best team of analysts we've ever seen in the NHL. With Meghan Chayka high up in the organization they won't be making dumb decisions like Kerfoot.


Wasn’t John Chayka making “analytical” moves in the desert. If they were using analytics they wouldn’t take Hyman because he’s had 2 knee injuries and play on a line with Matthews and Marner.

Analytics is finding value in players that’s incorrectly utilized. For eg. Riley smith, William Karlson and Marchesault. Kerfoot is one of those players if you follow analytics. He’s a top 6F that was asked to play a shutdown role. When he was give a top 6 opportunity he had 6 points in 7 games and held a strong game score.
8 juin 2021 à 22 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 1,030
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Wasn’t John Chayka making “analytical” moves in the desert. If they were using analytics they wouldn’t take Hyman because he’s had 2 knee injuries and play on a line with Matthews and Marner.

Analytics is finding value in players that’s incorrectly utilized. For eg. Riley smith, William Karlson and Marchesault. Kerfoot is one of those players if you follow analytics. He’s a top 6F that was asked to play a shutdown role. When he was give a top 6 opportunity he had 6 points in 7 games and held a strong game score.


John Chayka and Meghan Chayka are two different people? Just because they're siblings doesn't mean they're the same person lol

As for Kerfoot, he doesn't drive the play and frequently gives up high danger chances in his own end. He's a liability on the ice and making far more than he should be. That's all from looking at analytics.

He is an offensive minded 3C who can't play any hard minutes at best. Not someone worth 3.5 million.
8 juin 2021 à 22 h 40
#11
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Chapee44
John Chayka and Meghan Chayka are two different people? Just because they're siblings doesn't mean they're the same person lol

As for Kerfoot, he doesn't drive the play and frequently gives up high danger chances in his own end. He's a liability on the ice and making far more than he should be. That's all from looking at analytics.

He is an offensive minded 3C who can't play any hard minutes at best. Not someone worth 3.5 million.



That Airzona team was built off Chayka’s model…

Secondly what analytics are you looking at. If you didn’t know most of his shifts starts in the d-zone. Again he was place in an incorrect situation hence why I brought up William Karlsson, Riley Smith and Marchesault. Their analytics were similar to Kerfoots as like Kerfoot was utilized incorrectly.

So you basing off of analytics your taking Hyman whose linemates are 100 point players and he averages a higher game score because of his linemates. Dermott makes sense but like Kerfoot doesn’t have a lot of playing time yet your objectively taking him.
9 juin 2021 à 11 h 21
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 1,030
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
That Airzona team was built off Chayka’s model…

Secondly what analytics are you looking at. If you didn’t know most of his shifts starts in the d-zone. Again he was place in an incorrect situation hence why I brought up William Karlsson, Riley Smith and Marchesault. Their analytics were similar to Kerfoots as like Kerfoot was utilized incorrectly.

So you basing off of analytics your taking Hyman whose linemates are 100 point players and he averages a higher game score because of his linemates. Dermott makes sense but like Kerfoot doesn’t have a lot of playing time yet your objectively taking him.


Most of his shifts start in the OZone per Natural Stat Trick... lol
And they were built of John Chayka's model not Meghan's...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage