SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks Land 1 Overall

Créé par: DarthKane
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2021
Publié: 6 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know there’s a less than 1% chance Buffalo moves the #1 overall pick, but if there was a year the team makes this trade it’s this year. Plus, Buffalo needs players to help them win now. This is purely for fun.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
2950 000 $
1850 000 $
2900 000 $
76 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Power, Owen
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
#1 0verall
BUF
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. Dach, Kirby
  3. Kubalik, Dominik
  4. Shalunov, Maxim [Liste de réserve]
  5. Subban, Malcolm
  6. Teplý, Michal
  7. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
  8. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
#11 Overall
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 296 842 $452 439 $1 182 500 $9 203 158 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Power, Owen
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin 2021 à 19 h 55
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,910
Mentions "j'aime": 23,957
That package is an insane overpay
Wadejos123, Tyler_A10, Aussie_Blackhawk and 2 others a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 19 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
very bad for the hawks. Very very bad. I wouldn't trade Dach for the #1 pick alone. If the question is Dach or Power I pick Dach easily. And Reinhart isn't worth Kubalik+Boqvist+11th+2nd. His value isn't even in that universe. I get that this was made just for fun but value wise it's so bad for the hawks
Tyler_A10, csick, Aussie_Blackhawk and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 19 h 56
#3
Deleted
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 3,175
Mentions "j'aime": 1,812
Chicago's future is probably better off without that pick just based on how much you're giving up
Aussie_Blackhawk et Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 19 h 59
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 348
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Oh no. On no no no no no.
Even if you just look at the deal as
Reinhart
Power

For
Boqvist
Kubalik
Dach
Pick 11
It’s still garbage
Genuinely one of the worst overpays I’ve seen/over evaluation of how good Owen Power is
csick et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 3
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,910
Mentions "j'aime": 23,957
Quoting: Tyler_A10
Oh no. On no no no no no.
Even if you just look at the deal as
Reinhart
Power

For
Boqvist
Kubalik
Dach
Pick 11
It’s still garbage
Genuinely one of the worst overpays I’ve seen/over evaluation of how good Owen Power is


Who do u think is better, Power or Sanderson?
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,775
Mentions "j'aime": 14,516
Quoting: csick
That package is an insane overpay


Not with reinhart it isn't
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 8
#7
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,910
Mentions "j'aime": 23,957
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Not with reinhart it isn't


Yikes
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: csick
Who do u think is better, Power or Sanderson?


Good question. I like Sanderson though Power just played for Canada at Worlds on the top line. If a gun was at my head I would go Sanderson though Power's size is very enviable and he is mobile and can skate. Both haven't played NHL so very tough to say at this stage.
csick a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 14
#9
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,910
Mentions "j'aime": 23,957
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Good question. I like Sanderson though Power just played for Canada at Worlds on the top line. If a gun was at my head I would go Sanderson though Power's size is very enviable and he is mobile and can skate. Both haven't played NHL so very tough to say at this stage.


I agree , I’d take Sanderson rn only cuz he’s way better defensively and extremely mobile but it’s very close
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 348
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: csick
Who do u think is better, Power or Sanderson?


I would say Power. But it’s not by that much. Both players were over drafted assuming power goes 1.
csick a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 17
#11
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,910
Mentions "j'aime": 23,957
Quoting: Tyler_A10
I would say Power. But it’s not by that much. Both players were over drafted assuming power goes 1.


I think if Sanderson showed a bit more offence, he would’ve been higher. His skating and defence are elite.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 18
#12
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
Chicago is better off taking the best player available at 11.

Maybe Wallstedt....

Chicago loses half their future there.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 22
#13
Démarrer sujet
DarthKane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 830
Mentions "j'aime": 130
Quoting: ZachHymanForTheHart
Chicago is better off taking the best player available at 11.

Maybe Wallstedt....

Chicago loses half their future there.


I wouldn’t make that deal either, but if Chicago (or any team) wants the #1 overall pick that’s what it will take. I’d love for Stan to find a way to land Reinhart though.

At #11, I’m hoping McTavish is available but I think it’s unlikely. Raty or Sillinger will be the likely options.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 24
#14
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,295
Mentions "j'aime": 4,476
As much as I’d love to take the number 1 overall, this won’t work
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 25
#15
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
Quoting: DarthKane
I wouldn’t make that deal either, but if Chicago (or any team) wants the #1 overall pick that’s what it will take. I’d love for Stan to find a way to land Reinhart though.

At #11, I’m hoping McTavish is available but I think it’s unlikely. Raty or Sillinger will be the likely options.


I have a strong feeling McTavish will go to Ottawa. Local kid, great player. Seems like a storybook ending to his junior career.

I really think if Wallstedt is available though, Chicago should jump on him. He’s supposedly the best of the 3 first round goalies in these past years and I can’t see Lankinen being the goalie of the future in Chicago to be fully honest.
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 45
#16
2285 Stanley Cup Cha
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,404
Mentions "j'aime": 534
Quoting: csick
That package is an insane overpay


Nahhhh looks fair to me 😎
6 juin 2021 à 20 h 51
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,535
Mentions "j'aime": 618
As a Sabre fan I love it - But maybe just Reinhart + 1OA + 2021 2nd Bos for Dach, Kubalik, Teplý, 2021 1st round pick (CHI) 11OA - on the other hand I'm happy staying at 1OA I wasn't sure about Owen Power but his game improves a little bit every time I watch him - from what I've read he has a strong work ethic which makes him an unlikely bust - comparisons to Hedman are a little crazy but if he's anywhere close that's a huge win.
csick a aimé ceci.
7 juin 2021 à 0 h 22
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,331
This is a massive overpay; Darth, some of your ideas are decent, this one is pretty bad buddy
csick a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage