SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

off season move top 6 winger miller moves to 3C

Créé par: eliasweide
Publié: 4 juin 2021 à 21 h 0
Plafond salarial: 81 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 27/116 (23%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a été refusée, car une des équipes excède le plafond salarial

Logo de Lightning de Tampa BayLightning de Tampa Bay

La transaction a eu lieu alors que la LTIR est utilisée
Allègement provenant de la liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR): 25 475 000 $
Portion de la LTIR utilisée avant la transaction: 19 738 758 $
DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Cirelli, AnthonyLightning de Tampa BayLNH-4 800 000 $111---0000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (Logo de Canucks de VancouverVAN)---100------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial5 736 242 $3448652314
Variation4 800 000 $-1-1-1100
Final10 536 242 $ (↑)33 (↓)47 (↓)64 (↓)3 (↑)314000

Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver

La transaction a eu lieu alors que la LTIR est utilisée
Allègement provenant de la liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR): 8 175 000 $
Portion de la LTIR utilisée avant la transaction: 6 283 333 $
DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (Logo de Canucks de VancouverVAN)---100------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Cirelli, AnthonyLightning de Tampa BayLNH-4 800 000 $111---0000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial1 891 667 $2848623513
Variation-4 800 000 $111-100
Final-2 908 333 $ (↓)29 (↑)49 (↑)63 (↑)2 (↓)513000
4 juin 2021 à 21 h 17
#1
Fire J.D. too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,702
Mentions "j'aime": 913
Not a bad trade honestly, lightning fans might think otherwise though but with a flat cap they will lose someone at some point.. why not get a top 10 pick
4 juin 2021 à 21 h 35
#2
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Miller moves to 3c? And where does this guy play?

Cirelli is great but we have centers for days if you want Miller at 3c.

What we need is a top 4 D and nothing else this year. Maybe even less because we can't afford anyone.
4 juin 2021 à 21 h 45
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: reelkena
Miller moves to 3c? And where does this guy play?

Cirelli is great but we have centers for days if you want Miller at 3c.

What we need is a top 4 D and nothing else this year. Maybe even less because we can't afford anyone.


true I respect your comment. I knew I was gonna get a comment like this so ima explain. obviously the first round pick should be traded for a top 4 man but there aren't any solid top 4 dmen that have term after this season. Cirelli is a top 6 player and it shouldn't be a problem to play him on the wing. overall tho I would prefer trading this pick for a dman but I took advantage of Tampa being cap strapped so I just did this
PantsOffnJacket a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2021 à 21 h 56
#4
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: eliasweide
true I respect your comment. I knew I was gonna get a comment like this so ima explain. obviously the first round pick should be traded for a top 4 man but there aren't any solid top 4 dmen that have term after this season. Cirelli is a top 6 player and it shouldn't be a problem to play him on the wing. overall tho I would prefer trading this pick for a dman but I took advantage of Tampa being cap strapped so I just did this


Ryan Graves
Marco Scandella (might be bottom pair but his price is worth a shot)
Mattias Ekholm
Ghost (if they retain a bunch)
Mackenzie Weegar
Brett Pesce
eliasweide a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 0 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: reelkena
Ryan Graves
Marco Scandella (might be bottom pair but his price is worth a shot)
Mattias Ekholm
Ghost (if they retain a bunch)
Mackenzie Weegar
Brett Pesce


Ryan graves: plays for a contending team. sakic isn't dumb he will find another way to keep all his men and make Seattle take some AHL player
Scandella: not even top 4 on his own team. bottom pairing 100%
Ekholm: rental. 2022 UFA
Ghost; yes but not worth our first rounder
Weegar: Zito has no business trading away his top pairing dman and second best defensemen
pesce: same theory goes with sakic and graves
5 juin 2021 à 1 h 11
#6
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: eliasweide
Ryan graves: plays for a contending team. sakic isn't dumb he will find another way to keep all his men and make Seattle take some AHL player
Scandella: not even top 4 on his own team. bottom pairing 100%
Ekholm: rental. 2022 UFA
Ghost; yes but not worth our first rounder
Weegar: Zito has no business trading away his top pairing dman and second best defensemen
pesce: same theory goes with sakic and graves


Graves possible but explorable
Scandella not a top 4 on his own team, yeah. They have a better team than we do. That doesn't exclude him from top 4 on ours.
Ekholm he sure is a rental potentially. Cirelli has 2 years. One yeah of out actual problem is comparable to two years of not
Ghost then don't trade the first at all
Weegar they have a lot of D to work through and nobody is taking Yandle or Stralman. They also need cap to sign half a forward group.
Pesce possible but explorable
5 juin 2021 à 1 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,894
Mentions "j'aime": 6,396
Quoting: reelkena
Graves possible but explorable
Scandella not a top 4 on his own team, yeah. They have a better team than we do. That doesn't exclude him from top 4 on ours.
Ekholm he sure is a rental potentially. Cirelli has 2 years. One yeah of out actual problem is comparable to two years of not
Ghost then don't trade the first at all
Weegar they have a lot of D to work through and nobody is taking Yandle or Stralman. They also need cap to sign half a forward group.
Pesce possible but explorable


Cirelli expires as an RFA
5 juin 2021 à 1 h 17
#8
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: TheAlien
Cirelli expires as an RFA


thats an oof from me but i'll still go to bat for 5/6
5 juin 2021 à 13 h 49
#9
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,559
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: eliasweide
Ryan graves: plays for a contending team. sakic isn't dumb he will find another way to keep all his men and make Seattle take some AHL player
Scandella: not even top 4 on his own team. bottom pairing 100%
Ekholm: rental. 2022 UFA
Ghost; yes but not worth our first rounder
Weegar: Zito has no business trading away his top pairing dman and second best defensemen
pesce: same theory goes with sakic and graves


Quoting: reelkena
Ryan Graves
Marco Scandella (might be bottom pair but his price is worth a shot)
Mattias Ekholm
Ghost (if they retain a bunch)
Mackenzie Weegar
Brett Pesce


Aint no way COL is trading Graves. That guy is a monster back there and will be for a long time. Theyre blueline is set for years tbh. Girard,Byram,Makar,Teows,Graves. And COL will make sure Seattle doesnt take one
5 juin 2021 à 17 h 50
#10
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
Aint no way COL is trading Graves. That guy is a monster back there and will be for a long time. Theyre blueline is set for years tbh. Girard,Byram,Makar,Teows,Graves. And COL will make sure Seattle doesnt take one


This is why I think my point makes sense. People make these comments like "their D is set" doesn't matter that they are about to spend like 12 million more money on expiring ELC players over the next couple years and tons of forward contracts are coming up. Of course that wouldn't be important because the team is good so lets just play them no matter how much over the cap we get. Go team.
7 juin 2021 à 19 h 54
#11
PULL A TAMPA IGNORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,563
Mentions "j'aime": 690
tb passes easily
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage