SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Get a goalie and this team is dangerous

Créé par: Watty1
Équipe: 2016-17 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2017
Publié: 8 janv. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Elliott is a prototypical systems goalie, making L.A. a better fit for him than Calgary.

While Johnson has been good, a confident Fleury would, I think, take a talented Calgary team deep in the playoffs.

If they get trustworthy goaltending, Calgary can be very dangerous.
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Elliott, Brian (750 000 $ retained)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2018
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2273 000 000 $69 250 067 $630 500 $3 152 500 $3 749 933 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 6
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 7
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 575 000 $3 575 000 $
C
UFA - 2
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 300 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
690 000 $690 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 $$2K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
612 500 $612 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 916 667 $2 916 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
625 000 $625 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. 2017 à 18 h 11
#1
GaudsWish
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 540
Mentions "j'aime": 168
pens would rather elliot than Zaktoff, I like shinkaruk but Jim Rutherford would ask for a little more i assume, maybe a 3rd?
8 janv. 2017 à 18 h 19
#2
Démarrer sujet
Watty1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 1,280
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Quoting: gaudetster
pens would rather elliot than Zaktoff, I like shinkaruk but Jim Rutherford would ask for a little more i assume, maybe a 3rd?
Fair enough, but Zatkoff played well for Pittsburgh last year in the playoffs. I don't know if Pittsburgh plays the defensive game that fits Elliott so well, he and Zatkoff might actually be a saw off - and figure Pitt's cap situation.

Rutheford might get a 3rd, but teams know Pittsburgh has to move Fleury so that will hurt the return. But sure, a third could go as well.
8 janv. 2017 à 18 h 35
#3
Pens Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 119
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: Watty1
Quoting: gaudetster
pens would rather elliot than Zaktoff, I like shinkaruk but Jim Rutherford would ask for a little more i assume, maybe a 3rd?
Fair enough, but Zatkoff played well for Pittsburgh last year in the playoffs. I don't know if Pittsburgh plays the defensive game that fits Elliott so well, he and Zatkoff might actually be a saw off - and figure Pitt's cap situation.

Rutheford might get a 3rd, but teams know Pittsburgh has to move Fleury so that will hurt the return. But sure, a third could go as well.


Zatkoff was well-liked in the Pens locker room, and would be more willing to take a backup role than Elliott would, although his form suggests he should. The extra cap space could bring in a depth defenseman and apparently Landeskog now. I know the Landeskog-to-Pittsburgh rumors will probably never come true, but just imagine them with him.
8 janv. 2017 à 19 h 52
#4
BombSquad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 613
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Zatkoff has another year left on his contract and would immediately suffice the exposure requirement, whereas they would need to re-sign Elliott. Therefore, Zatkoff has more value in this instance.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage