SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The NJD forward problem

Créé par: MartysBetter29
Équipe: 2020-21 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 8 avr. 2021
Publié: 8 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Devils have done a pretty decent job acquiring assets in recent years and have had some lottery luck to aid the rebuild. But the on-ice results have been extremely poor and there seems to be a lack of top tier talent beyond the two #1OAs. I projected our young guys into 4 classes, legitimate NHL top 6, hopeful/fringe NHL top 6, legitimate bottom 6 and unlikely NHLer. By legitimate I am talking about can they adequately fill that role on a competitive playoff team in the future.

LW: legit top 6
C: hopeful/fringe top 6
RW: legit bottom 6
LD: unlikely legit NHLer

Basically what I found (as expected) is that there are a TON of bottom 6 worthy young players. I could be overvaluing some guys but I really don't look at any of them as unlikely to play legit bottom 6 minutes in the NHL at some point whether it's with NJ or somewhere else.

But as you go further left the bar gets smaller and smaller. I don't know if you can project any players or prospects comfortably as top 6 players after Hughes and Hischier. There are a few hopeful top 6 guys with Holtz probably closest to breaking the threshold as a legit top 6 but overall slim pickings.

Unfortunately the NHL isn't built to be kind to teams with weak top 6's and good but young bottom 6's. In fact it's pretty much the exact opposite. Get elite, fast, young players in the top 6 and fill out the bottom 6 with experienced vets.

I'm not proposing NJ go out and sign a bunch of 35 year old grinders to play bottom 6. I'm more interested in the idea of how you move some of those pieces on the right to get a significant piece or two to put into the left or center column. I don't have any great ideas because Im an internet dummy but I'd hope Devils management are open to finding creative solutions to turn an abundance of average young talent into a couple of premiere talents. Easier said than done.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NJD
Logo de ARI
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de ARI
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYI
Logo de NJD
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2881 500 000 $68 124 387 $0 $4 205 000 $13 375 613 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
811 666 $811 666 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 822 764 $2 822 764 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 avr. 2021 à 8 h 0
#1
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,669
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
As you get closer to being truly competitive again, spending on talent in free agency or through trades starts to make more sense. So perhaps in the near future, someone will become available via one of those methods and the Devils can use their surplus of assets to pounce on the opportunity.

This year, NJ will probably pick no later than 7th, so they’ll get another opportunity to take a potential top-6 forward, adding to that collection of four you currently have. So then let’s say you hit on 3 out of those 5. Ultimately that’s not so bad. Add a bigger name down the line or be surprised by one of the guys who you’re projecting to be bottom 6 now and you have a pretty good group for the top 6.

I definitely see your concern; beyond Hischier and Hughes, there’s very little wow-factor to this team’s future, but you know better than I do that they aren’t fine building. Will be interesting to see where they go next and what moves they make when they start getting a lot closer
cperk92, zyyyp et MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. 2021 à 10 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,267
Mentions "j'aime": 18,763
HUGHES and HISCHIER - 1C and 2C
BRATT, HOLTZ, MERCER - top-6 wings
SHARANGOVICH, ZACHA - possible top-6 wings or 3C
FOOTE - probably 3rd liner who plays PP1
KUOKKANEN, THOMPSON, GRITSYUK, PASIC - skilled wingers who could reach top-6 ceiling
BASTIAN, WOOD, MCLEOD, MALTSEV, PYTLIK - some heavies for bottom-6
TALVITIE, MOYNIHAN - smart, two-way forwards that could find roles in bottom-6
CLARKE - Right-shot sniper with considerably high ceiling. But always hurt.
BOQVIST - Too much speed and skill for his production. Still has middle-six upside, but I think will need change of scenery.

Add in a 2021 draft that could such combos as

Edvinsson (6), Lucius (24)...or...
Guenther (6), Lambos (24)...or...
Lysell (6), Sillinger (24)...

We'll be good.
Defense is bigger concern for me.
MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 24
#3
Démarrer sujet
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
As you get closer to being truly competitive again, spending on talent in free agency or through trades starts to make more sense. So perhaps in the near future, someone will become available via one of those methods and the Devils can use their surplus of assets to pounce on the opportunity.

This year, NJ will probably pick no later than 7th, so they’ll get another opportunity to take a potential top-6 forward, adding to that collection of four you currently have. So then let’s say you hit on 3 out of those 5. Ultimately that’s not so bad. Add a bigger name down the line or be surprised by one of the guys who you’re projecting to be bottom 6 now and you have a pretty good group for the top 6.

I definitely see your concern; beyond Hischier and Hughes, there’s very little wow-factor to this team’s future, but you know better than I do that they aren’t fine building. Will be interesting to see where they go next and what moves they make when they start getting a lot closer


Agreed on all points.
8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: NHLfan10506
HUGHES and HISCHIER - 1C and 2C
BRATT, HOLTZ, MERCER - top-6 wings
SHARANGOVICH, ZACHA - possible top-6 wings or 3C
FOOTE - probably 3rd liner who plays PP1
KUOKKANEN, THOMPSON, GRITSYUK, PASIC - skilled wingers who could reach top-6 ceiling
BASTIAN, WOOD, MCLEOD, MALTSEV, PYTLIK - some heavies for bottom-6
TALVITIE, MOYNIHAN - smart, two-way forwards that could find roles in bottom-6
CLARKE - Right-shot sniper with considerably high ceiling. But always hurt.
BOQVIST - Too much speed and skill for his production. Still has middle-six upside, but I think will need change of scenery.

Add in a 2021 draft that could such combos as

Edvinsson (6), Lucius (24)...or...
Guenther (6), Lambos (24)...or...
Lysell (6), Sillinger (24)...

We'll be good.
Defense is bigger concern for me.


Yeah I agree, I'm not overly concerned about the forward group more just interested in where we are at right now. Having a ton of young middle/bottom 6 players isn't a bad thing. I would muchhhh rather be where they are now than back a few years ago where the forward group rounded out with guys like Michael Ryder, P.A. Parenteau, Tyler Kennedy, and Tuomo Ruutu. The only problem/area to address that I see coming is there are only 12 forward roster spots. Even if things work out and our top 6 includes Hischier, Hughes, Holtz, Mercer, and Bratt that still leaves the rest competing for 6 slots, and that's assuming they don't add a single vet. So who sits if you can only pick 6?
- Zacha
- Sharangovich
- Foote
- Kuokkanen
- Wood
- McLeod
- Bastian
- Thompson
- Clarke
- Maltsev
- Talvitie
- Boqvist
- etc, etc.

I think you are having to leave a couple of guys off the roster that you would like to give a shot. Which isn't a bad thing necessarily, just shows how improved the depth is from years past. But I am curious if they can find ways to move some of those pieces to try to add higher skill or address other areas of need like D which I agree with you completely is a much greater concern at the moment.
8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 58
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,267
Mentions "j'aime": 18,763
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
beyond Hischier and Hughes, there’s very little wow-factor to this team’s future, but you know better than I do that they aren’t fine building.


They have the youngest team in NHL (average under 25 years old)
The 3rd smallest team.
And a team with an average of 4.6 years of NHL experience, lowest of any team in years.
They have $36 million in current cap space.
With patient ownership.
And one of the best pipelines in all of hockey.
What do you suggest they do? Blow it up before half their kids arrive?

The forward group doesn't worry me in the slightest. They are very young, very small and inexperienced.
The defense is where they should focus.
Smith, Severson look great.
And I'd hope we'd get 2 good ones from Bahl, Walsh, Mukhammadullin, Okhotyuk, Misyul, McCarthy, Vukojovich, Edwards.
Maybe can draft one stud this year acquire another young defensive d-man later.

Future is really, really bright.
They are fine building.
8 avr. 2021 à 18 h 14
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,267
Mentions "j'aime": 18,763
Quoting: MartysBetter29
Yeah I agree, I'm not overly concerned about the forward group more just interested in where we are at right now. Having a ton of young middle/bottom 6 players isn't a bad thing. I would muchhhh rather be where they are now than back a few years ago where the forward group rounded out with guys like Michael Ryder, P.A. Parenteau, Tyler Kennedy, and Tuomo Ruutu. The only problem/area to address that I see coming is there are only 12 forward roster spots. Even if things work out and our top 6 includes Hischier, Hughes, Holtz, Mercer, and Bratt that still leaves the rest competing for 6 slots, and that's assuming they don't add a single vet. So who sits if you can only pick 6?
- Zacha
- Sharangovich
- Foote
- Kuokkanen
- Wood
- McLeod
- Bastian
- Thompson
- Clarke
- Maltsev
- Talvitie
- Boqvist
- etc, etc.

I think you are having to leave a couple of guys off the roster that you would like to give a shot. Which isn't a bad thing necessarily, just shows how improved the depth is from years past. But I am curious if they can find ways to move some of those pieces to try to add higher skill or address other areas of need like D which I agree with you completely is a much greater concern at the moment.


I'm guessing the lineup in a few years, among existing options, would look like this

1st: Zacha - Hischier - Bratt
2nd: Kuokkanen - Hughes - Holtz
3rd: Foote - Sharangovich - Mercer
4th: Wood, McLeod, Bastian
extra: Gritsyuk, Thompson, Pasic, Clarke, Maltsev, Pytlik

If Thompson, Gritsyuk or Clarke (or even Boqvist) reach their offensive potential, could also look like this:

1st: Zacha - Hischier - Holtz
2nd: Bratt - Hughes - [Thompson, Gritsyuk, Clarke]
3rd: Foote - Sharangovich - Mercer
4th: Kuokkanen, McLeod, Bastian
extra: Wood, Pasic, Maltsev, Pytlik [Thompson, Gritsyuk, Clarke]

Say Sharangovich continues to grow into shooter...Gritsyuk arrives, and they trade Wood for d-man, lose Bastian to Seattle....

1st: Sharangovich - Hischier - Mercer
2nd: Bratt - Hughes - Holtz
3rd: Foote - Zacha - Gritsyuk
4th: Maltsev - McLeod - Pytlik
extra: Maltsev, Pasic, Clarke, Thompson, Kuokkanen

Lots of options and depth at forward.
MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. 2021 à 18 h 29
#7
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,669
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: NHLfan10506
They have the youngest team in NHL (average under 25 years old)
The 3rd smallest team.
And a team with an average of 4.6 years of NHL experience, lowest of any team in years.
They have $36 million in current cap space.
With patient ownership.
And one of the best pipelines in all of hockey.
What do you suggest they do? Blow it up before half their kids arrive?

The forward group doesn't worry me in the slightest. They are very young, very small and inexperienced.
The defense is where they should focus.
Smith, Severson look great.
And I'd hope we'd get 2 good ones from Bahl, Walsh, Mukhammadullin, Okhotyuk, Misyul, McCarthy, Vukojovich, Edwards.
Maybe can draft one stud this year acquire another young defensive d-man later.

Future is really, really bright.
They are fine building.


I apologize. I typed this out right after I woke up. Upon 2nd reading I meant "They aren't done building." My apologies lol
MartysBetter29 et NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. 2021 à 18 h 38
#8
Démarrer sujet
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I'm guessing the lineup in a few years, among existing options, would look like this

1st: Zacha - Hischier - Bratt
2nd: Kuokkanen - Hughes - Holtz
3rd: Foote - Sharangovich - Mercer
4th: Wood, McLeod, Bastian
extra: Gritsyuk, Thompson, Pasic, Clarke, Maltsev, Pytlik

If Thompson, Gritsyuk or Clarke (or even Boqvist) reach their offensive potential, could also look like this:

1st: Zacha - Hischier - Holtz
2nd: Bratt - Hughes - [Thompson, Gritsyuk, Clarke]
3rd: Foote - Sharangovich - Mercer
4th: Kuokkanen, McLeod, Bastian
extra: Wood, Pasic, Maltsev, Pytlik [Thompson, Gritsyuk, Clarke]

Say Sharangovich continues to grow into shooter...Gritsyuk arrives, and they trade Wood for d-man, lose Bastian to Seattle....

1st: Sharangovich - Hischier - Mercer
2nd: Bratt - Hughes - Holtz
3rd: Foote - Zacha - Gritsyuk
4th: Maltsev - McLeod - Pytlik
extra: Maltsev, Pasic, Clarke, Thompson, Kuokkanen

Lots of options and depth at forward.


Watch, after all of this time fans like us spend projecting and formulating lineups they will pull some crazy stuff out of left field and end up with a completely different looking lineup. Always seems to go that way haha. I'm definitely optimistic about the future!!
8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,267
Mentions "j'aime": 18,763
Quoting: MartysBetter29
Watch, after all of this time fans like us spend projecting and formulating lineups they will pull some crazy stuff out of left field and end up with a completely different looking lineup. Always seems to go that way haha. I'm definitely optimistic about the future!!


2023 top-six
Lambert - Eichel - Kane
Hall - Henrique - Palmieri
MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage