SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Options at the TDL

Créé par: oilersfan150
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 26 mars 2021
Publié: 26 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I have heard some talk that Holland has been interested in these guys. Hes supposedly trying to get one of them for a fourth, I personally feel that Luke Glendening is the best option because of his cap hit, but I would like to hear some opinions in the comments.
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $89 135 699 $341 534 $730 000 $-7 635 699 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
915 000 $915 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $ (4 675 000 $$5M4 675 000 $$5M)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
745 000 $745 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Who is best option?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


26 mars 2021 à 20 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
3rd for LGD no retention
26 mars 2021 à 20 h 43
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 729
Quoting: fedorov91
3rd for LGD no retention


We don't have a third this year to give.
fedorov91 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 20 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: oilersfan150
We don't have a third this year to give.


2022 is fine
oilersfan150 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 21 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 462
Mentions "j'aime": 162
I've been advocating for Glendening for a while now. Bringing him in makes tons of sense
26 mars 2021 à 21 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 462
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: fedorov91
3rd for LGD no retention


I doubt it. Staal was traded with 50% retention (on $3.25mill, so only a $1.625mill cap hit) for a 3rd and a 5th. LGD at $1.8mill for a 3rd? No thank you. DET eats a bad contract for that price. A 4th is reasonable. I really doubt his FO% will jack up his value that much. There are multiple similar 4C's available, with few teams seeking that type of player at the TDL
26 mars 2021 à 21 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: McDavidFan97
I doubt it. Staal was traded with 50% retention (on $3.25mill, so only a $1.625mill cap hit) for a 3rd and a 5th. LGD at $1.8mill for a 3rd? No thank you. DET eats a bad contract for that price. A 4th is reasonable. I really doubt his FO% will jack up his value that much. There are multiple similar 4C's available, with few teams seeking that type of player at the TDL


That's fine, you don't get him and someone will pay the price for him. Staal is having a worse season then LGD and has a different value. 1.8 is the same contract for staal technically and no 5th so just a 3rd and it's equal. Playoff teams would rather take lgd right now for his Faceoffs then staal and his lack of scoring. I'm totally fine with you passing because 24 other playoff teams want him right now and we'll get our 3rd and I can care less that the oilers aren't the team to get him


Oh and to add to it. Holland covets a Right handed shot right now, good luck in the playoffs
26 mars 2021 à 21 h 35
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 462
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: fedorov91
That's fine, you don't get him and someone will pay the price for him. Staal is having a worse season then LGD and has a different value. 1.8 is the same contract for staal technically and no 5th so just a 3rd and it's equal. Playoff teams would rather take lgd right now for his Faceoffs then staal and his lack of scoring. I'm totally fine with you passing because 24 other playoff teams want him right now and we'll get our 3rd and I can care less that the oilers aren't the team to get him


Oh and to add to it. Holland covets a Right handed shot right now, good luck in the playoffs


I can tell that you are pretty biased, but I'm sure I am as well lol

On no planet is LGD anywhere near as valuable as Staal. Staal is a 100 point scorer. Long time captain and leader. Won a cup. Scored 47 points in 66 games last year. As of last season, he is a very productive 2C. I really doubt a down year an a historically bad Buffalo team takes away that much from his value. You can't compare a guy with Staal's track record to LGD who has had an unusually high FO% this season and has never scored 30 points. Staal is at a steal of cap hit. The retention factored into the return of a 3rd + 5th rounder. Realistically, the 5th was the cost of retention, the 3rd for the player. LGD for a 4th is fair, but ill be on the record as saying I dont like giving up a 3rd, incase your right lol
oilersfan150 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 21 h 41
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: McDavidFan97
I can tell that you are pretty biased, but I'm sure I am as well lol

On no planet is LGD anywhere near as valuable as Staal. Staal is a 100 point scorer. Long time captain and leader. Won a cup. Scored 47 points in 66 games last year. As of last season, he is a very productive 2C. I really doubt a down year an a historically bad Buffalo team takes away that much from his value. You can't compare a guy with Staal's track record to LGD who has had an unusually high FO% this season and has never scored 30 points. Staal is at a steal of cap hit. The retention factored into the return of a 3rd + 5th rounder. Realistically, the 5th was the cost of retention, the 3rd for the player. LGD for a 4th is fair, but ill be on the record as saying I dont like giving up a 3rd, incase your right lol


Sounds good, but talking about staals past accomplishments compared to his season now is way different. Marleau isn't worth a 7th now and has a better career then LGD as well. There are a lot of teams that covet him so I'm sure he will go for a 3rd and if your right and it's a 4th I'll say it the opposite of you that I don't like it
26 mars 2021 à 22 h 51
#9
Pistol Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,140
Mentions "j'aime": 1,479
Quoting: McDavidFan97
I doubt it. Staal was traded with 50% retention (on $3.25mill, so only a $1.625mill cap hit) for a 3rd and a 5th. LGD at $1.8mill for a 3rd? No thank you. DET eats a bad contract for that price. A 4th is reasonable. I really doubt his FO% will jack up his value that much. There are multiple similar 4C's available, with few teams seeking that type of player at the TDL


Turris plus a 3rd for Glendening is fair.
McDavidFan97 et oilersfan150 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 23 h 25
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
I think Vancouver would retain 50% on Sutter for a 2nd.
27 mars 2021 à 12 h 22
#11
Kovid Klaw
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 779
Mentions "j'aime": 154
glendening is overated, if they really wanted ryan they would have claimed him. Sutter is the only one that makes sense
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage