I would prefer Nylander get traded instead of depending Engvall and Spezza at centre (who has playing mostly RW) than Kerfoot.
Thanks quite a package for Forsburg. I doubt if any team would offer as much

Forsberg @ 50% for a couple of long shots (Kral and Homberg), a b level prospect, 3 more years of cap to make the money work for the Leafs, a late 1st and late 2nd. Somehow, I don't think this is the deal Nashville jumps on...

I'm guessing for Forsberg at 50% retained, Nashville would be asking for Robertson to start. As a Leaf fan, I'm not doing that.

Really? You think that's alot? Forsberg still has a year left and is still a great top line winger. Kerfoot has been playing well recently, but he isn't anywhere near Forsberg on his best day. The only thing of any substance in this trade is Abramov and the picks.

Well, you put Engvall at 3C and now with Matthews hurt (or any other future injuries), what Engvall is now a 2C? Sure Forsberg is better than Kerfoot but it real risk to add a winger for centre. And really the Leafs have lots of competent wingers. I really don't know why so many folks make posts of for the Leafs getting wingers and the expense of centres...and sometimes Dmen.

That’s a really good point! I added a centre trade so that we regain our depth at centre! Better?