SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Values

Créé par: jacobzentner
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2021
Publié: 21 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Saw this for another team so I thought I would do it for the Pens.
LW-Untouchable
C-Difficult to Acquire
RW-Large piece that would be used as part of a blockbuster
LD-Moderate Value
RD-Little to No value
Scratch-Negative Value
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
4881 500 000 $97 504 758 $0 $3 035 000 $-16 004 758 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $
AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
788 333 $788 333 $ (Bonis de performance42 500 $$42K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
853 333 $853 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
806 250 $806 250 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 janv. 2021 à 10 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,667
Mentions "j'aime": 5,252
Marino is untouchable?
21 janv. 2021 à 10 h 47
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Guentzel should be in the LW.
Sceviour doesn't have negative value. He'd a RD kind of guy. He's on a 1 year day and that cap hit is 0 when sent down to the AHL. So he doesn't really have a "negative" value.
The same might be said about Ceci. 1 year deal, almost all of that cap hit is AHL swallowed.
That Matheson contract though, that might be a problem.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 11 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
Guentzel should be in the LW.
Sceviour doesn't have negative value. He'd a RD kind of guy. He's on a 1 year day and that cap hit is 0 when sent down to the AHL. So he doesn't really have a "negative" value.
The same might be said about Ceci. 1 year deal, almost all of that cap hit is AHL swallowed.
That Matheson contract though, that might be a problem.


Yup. I’ll admit I was wrong about Tanev. I thought that contract would be a problem but as of yet he’s been better than advertised. His contract will eventually suck but pens will be rebuilding by then. Matheson is really our only troublesome contract
21 janv. 2021 à 11 h 53
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
Yup. I’ll admit I was wrong about Tanev. I thought that contract would be a problem but as of yet he’s been better than advertised. His contract will eventually suck but pens will be rebuilding by then. Matheson is really our only troublesome contract


best they can probably do is dump it on seattle for the cost of a 2nd maybe a B prospect. They don't really have a 1st to offer. 2022 1st is not something they should part with and anything after that is a gamble.

I don't know, at this point it looks like they lost that trade. Because Horny was an easier contract to move to seattle I think. And horny is racking up points for now. But 2 years over 5 is a huge difference.
All to save 425k. Kind of a huge mistake at this point. As that contract is gonna be hard to move if he can't turn it around.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
Jacob Zentner
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 495
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: gmgb
Marino is untouchable?


In my opinion they dont move him for anyone.
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Jacob Zentner
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 495
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: pharrow
Guentzel should be in the LW.
Sceviour doesn't have negative value. He'd a RD kind of guy. He's on a 1 year day and that cap hit is 0 when sent down to the AHL. So he doesn't really have a "negative" value.
The same might be said about Ceci. 1 year deal, almost all of that cap hit is AHL swallowed.
That Matheson contract though, that might be a problem.


Guentzel was a toughy. I think they could move him if they feel they are getting an amazing offer but I think it is incredibly unlikely. As for Sceviour and Ceci, I dont believe the cap for ahl would be 0 but would be minimal. I put them in negative because they are likely not claimed on waivers if they were put on waivers.
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 29
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: jacobzentner
Guentzel was a toughy. I think they could move him if they feel they are getting an amazing offer but I think it is incredibly unlikely. As for Sceviour and Ceci, I dont believe the cap for ahl would be 0 but would be minimal. I put them in negative because they are likely not claimed on waivers if they were put on waivers.


175,000 and 125,000 cap hit respectively.
It's like nothing.
I don't know on the waivers. It depends on the injuries around the league. Especially on defense. Neither guy is carried forward. So it's a fill in role for injury if teams have long term issues. Now forwards are a little more easily filled but defense, you never know.
jacobzentner a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage