SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

PLD because why not

Créé par: gm_jeanguy
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 2 janv. 2021
Publié: 2 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trade happens with an extension in place for Danault. CBJ gets a top line C back, plus a top prospect to compensate for the age difference. MTL adds a D to balance the cap and fill a hole in CBJ's lineup.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 557 976 $0 $3 137 500 $4 942 024 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
735 000 $735 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 janv. 2021 à 10 h 37
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,218
Mentions "j'aime": 7,008
To answer your question of why not; because columbus has free will.
2 janv. 2021 à 10 h 43
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,830
Mentions "j'aime": 8,853
Modifié 2 janv. 2021 à 10 h 48
Danault is not a top line center. More of a top 3rd line center. Serviceable 2nd. Swap Kulak for a 2nd or a prospect if similar value and you have hit the value.

CBJ declines though. PLD may want out. But he’s signed. No leverage to force a trade. They don’t have to move him. And CBJ would get better offers if they put him on the market.
2 janv. 2021 à 10 h 56
#3
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
seems like a good deal for the bjs if they had to make a move. im sure they would much prefer to keep pld.
2 janv. 2021 à 11 h 14
#4
HABS for LIFE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Caufield is our future and with the cap and Seattle draft , so Montreal might get rid of Tatar or armia because they have to be able to afford to sign them.
2 janv. 2021 à 11 h 15
#5
Démarrer sujet
Habs fan somehow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 312
Mentions "j'aime": 80
Quoting: Gofnut999
Danault is not a top line center. More of a top 3rd line center. Serviceable 2nd.


Fyi, as per Dom Luszczyszyn's model, Danault's (1.9) and PLD's (2.2) projected wins value are very much comparable, and both land into top line C category. True, Danault's points totals are underwhelming, but that says a lot about his defensive acumen.
2 janv. 2021 à 11 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,830
Mentions "j'aime": 8,853
Quoting: gm_jeanguy
Fyi, as per Dom Luszczyszyn's model, Danault's (1.9) and PLD's (2.2) projected wins value are very much comparable, and both land into top line C category. True, Danault's points totals are underwhelming, but that says a lot about his defensive acumen.


Ya but top line centers are about driving the offense. Danault does not. The front office has spent 3 years trying to upgrade top 6 center because they know he isn’t. Despite what he thinks and teams fans want to think. Great player. Probably the best 3rd center in the league. Can get by as 2 but it’s not ideal.
2 janv. 2021 à 11 h 35
#7
Démarrer sujet
Habs fan somehow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 312
Mentions "j'aime": 80
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ya but top line centers are about driving the offense. Danault does not. The front office has spent 3 years trying to upgrade top 6 center because they know he isn’t. Despite what he thinks and teams fans want to think. Great player. Probably the best 3rd center in the league. Can get by as 2 but it’s not ideal.


Dom has put tremendous effort to come forth with an unbiased model to assess players value. With all due respect, I'll stick with his opinion.
2 janv. 2021 à 11 h 40
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,830
Mentions "j'aime": 8,853
Quoting: gm_jeanguy
Dom has put tremendous effort to come forth with an unbiased model to assess players value. With all due respect, I'll stick with his opinion.


Feel free to. Does not change that fact that this is not good for CBJ given their roster.

If they had a legit #1 center this would make some sense. Their top 6 centers after this move....Danault and Domi. Hmmm. Tell us....how did that work out? Of all fan bases that should understand that.....

CBJ is already offensively challenged. This makes them even worse.

So why does it make sense for them to when they don’t have to?

One thing for sure....Torts would love Danault.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage