SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What would the Bruins look like if they drafted well in 2015

Créé par: WN88
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 29 oct. 2020
Publié: 29 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
89 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
BOS
  1. Barzal, Mathew [Droits de RFA]
NYI
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $81 185 171 $964 222 $2 000 000 $314 829 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 6
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 oct. 2020 à 10 h 5
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,097
Mentions "j'aime": 7,773
Quoting: hanson493
I have no clue about these players? so tell me when does a 20 year old barzal get his first reps at 1 or 2c for the bruins. bruins gave krejci a 6 year 43.5m extension in the 2015 offseason which happened to come with a full nmc. So we draft barzal and then say 2 years later, hey krejc gunna need you to waive that nmc so we can move your contract cuz this kid might be better than you. AT BEST barzal is either a 3c or a 2W for a few years. He 100% isnt playing over bergeron or krejci. Why you would think he would play 1c or 2c over established vets is mindblowing.

Where did I say anything about trading anyone? tears of joy awesome face

Barzal was twice the player Krejci was in 2017-18. He might have broken camp as 3C, but would've moved up quickly.

Quoting: hanson493
Chabot is a little different. but that would have meant the bruins would have had to trade krug after HE signed an extension. Im being realistic. Chabot stays in juniors and doesnt see nhl time until after he gets a year in providence. Unless they need to throw someone into the fire (mcavoy/carlo) they try and let them get as much ice time as possible... why give chabot 3ld where he gets maybe 14 minutes a night when you can give him 20+ in providence. Hence why vaak and zboril have been in providence for 2 years and not as 3 LD...

Once again, I said nothing about trading anyone. I don't know why you'd think having better prospects mean you have to trade players, you clearly don't understand how this works. Tampa went out and acquired McDonough (LHD) the year that Sergachev (LHD) established himself behind Hedman (LHD) in the NHL. There's no reason Boston couldn't have run Chara, Krug and Chabot down the left side and sent Grzelcyk back to the AHL.
30 oct. 2020 à 10 h 41
#52
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,618
Mentions "j'aime": 2,764
Quoting: CD282
Where did I say anything about trading anyone? tears of joy awesome face

Barzal was twice the player Krejci was in 2017-18. He might have broken camp as 3C, but would've moved up quickly.

Barzal had 60 assists. tell me who on the bruins hes passing to? does barzal suddenly become a 30 goal scorer next to krejci instead of a playmaker? Krejci and barzal have the same play style except krejci is a little slower pace wise.

Once again, I said nothing about trading anyone. I don't know why you'd think having better prospects mean you have to trade players, you clearly don't understand how this works. Tampa went out and acquired McDonough (LHD) the year that Sergachev (LHD) established himself behind Hedman (LHD) in the NHL. There's no reason Boston couldn't have run Chara, Krug and Chabot down the left side and sent Grzelcyk back to the AHL.


The year sergachev established himself behind hedman? what? serg had 15m TOI that year with a 70% offensive zone start percentage. Hedman was playing at 25m a night. They brought in Mcdonough because they needed a 2 left dman that actually played solid defense and sergachev wasnt ready for that role. Then you look at 2018-2019 Hedmans toi drops from 25 to 22 and mcdonough logs 22 as well, serg gets a slight uptick to 17. It wasnt until this past year that serg really established himself behind hedman as a solid all around player, mainly because mcdonough was banged up and is now starting to show his age a little bit.

Chabot in 2017-2018 62% o zone start rate. in that same year torey krug 65.2% offensive zone start rate. assuming everything is equal how do you put chabot and krug on the ice in the same situations. They would have had to move krug to play chabot in that role. As opposed to tampa who had a spot sergachev could take and let him grow into his role. chabot isnt getting offensive starts with krug here and he isnt getting pp time with krug here so why force a player into a bottom pairing role when the team didnt need him there?

to address trading... you dont pay a guy 7.25m to be your 3c or play him out of position. you either play barzal out of position or you trade krejci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage