Complaining about the logic of others while staunchly defending Quick as a Hall of Famer is... something

At very most if Stanley Cup contributions helped *elevate* elite players into the HOF it'd be one thing

Like if Hossa made it over Naslund for that reason or something... that's one thing... cups giving leverage

But for solid players to get lucky and end up on dynasties where they just kinda keep things steady

For one we'd have way too many HOFers it'd get crowded and dilute the merit, it'd also just be dumb

Perfect time for me to leave the chat! Wowzers.

Then why didn't the Rangers beat the Kings in 2014 or win a cup at all for that matter?

Later!

Because the Rangers have never put a good team around him. It was very clear that Lundqvist was the only reason they went as far as they did that year