SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Looking at different options

Créé par: Jumbo_Shark19
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 20 oct. 2020
Publié: 20 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
NJD
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Sörensen, Marcus
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Adjust pick+prospect of necessary.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 140 000 $0 $277 500 $7 360 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 oct. 2020 à 22 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Why always adding 2 fourth liners to get a 3rd liner
That’s not how it works
They are cheap, you always said they are good ( not you but Sharks fans in general ), so keep them !
Jumbo_Shark19 a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2020 à 22 h 40
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 343
Mentions "j'aime": 97
Quoting: GMs
Why always adding 2 fourth lines to get a 3rd liner
That’s not how it works
They are cheap, you always said they are good ( not you but Sharks fans in general ), so keep them !


Sorenson has traditionally played 3LW. Im just trying to find a replacement 3C that would fit well on this roster.

I've seen plenty of NJ fans trading away Zacha for solely a 3rd. I don't think that a 3rd alone is anywhere near enough for him. I've also seen some recently posting Sorenson for Carrick. Figured if Jersey is looking for LW help, and Sharks needing a 3C, it has some sense to it. Threw in Gambrell as a prospect with the note of swapping the pick or prospect if needed.
20 oct. 2020 à 22 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Jumbo_Shark19
Sorenson has traditionally played 3LW. Im just trying to find a replacement 3C that would fit well on this roster.

I've seen plenty of NJ fans trading away Zacha for solely a 3rd. I don't think that a 3rd alone is anywhere near enough for him. I've also seen some recently posting Sorenson for Carrick. Figured if Jersey is looking for LW help, and Sharks needing a 3C, it has some sense to it. Threw in Gambrell as a prospect with the note of swapping the pick or prospect if needed.


If NJ really want Sorensens, they just have to throw a 4th to get him and keep Zacha
20 oct. 2020 à 22 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: GMs
Why always adding 2 fourth liners to get a 3rd liner
That’s not how it works
They are cheap, you always said they are good ( not you but Sharks fans in general ), so keep them !

If any of us has said those two are good they were lying. Sorenson is a serviceable 3LW but we have tons of those in the wings and don’t need him. Gambrell has some potential but needs a change of scenery imo
GMs a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2020 à 1 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: papishark
If any of us has said those two are good they were lying. Sorenson is a serviceable 3LW but we have tons of those in the wings and don’t need him. Gambrell has some potential but needs a change of scenery imo


I’ve said over and over Sorenson is a good player and we should keep him!!!
He is the type of player similar to Melker Karlsson And Goodrow who are only seen as valuable after they are gone and you see the things he did that previously went unnoticed.
Yes we have a ton of bottom 6 prospects but Sorenson is proven and a really good Pk guy. Everyone bashed on Melker and are bashing on Sorenson but both are valuable good guys who fill a need on a team well.
Gambrel I would trade for a 6 pack and a bottle of whiskey to be named later. Lol
21 oct. 2020 à 2 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Revans292
I’ve said over and over Sorenson is a good player and we should keep him!!!
He is the type of player similar to Melker Karlsson And Goodrow who are only seen as valuable after they are gone and you see the things he did that previously went unnoticed.
Yes we have a ton of bottom 6 prospects but Sorenson is proven and a really good Pk guy. Everyone bashed on Melker and are bashing on Sorenson but both are valuable good guys who fill a need on a team well.
Gambrel I would trade for a 6 pack and a bottle of whiskey to be named later. Lol


Melker Karlsson was not good. He was good at the pk and thats literally it. His offense was a black hole and we are better without him
21 oct. 2020 à 3 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: papishark
Melker Karlsson was not good. He was good at the pk and thats literally it. His offense was a black hole and we are better without him


Scouts and Coaching staffs would disagree with us.
I say us because I hated Melker... but coaches loved him, his teammates loved him he was good on the PK solid defensive forward and was selfless. There are parts of his game we will miss but I’m glad he isn’t here as his spot is now going to go to a prospect with better upside!

Or maybe it was just San Jose scouts and coaching staff since no one picked him up!
papishark a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2020 à 10 h 54
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Revans292
Scouts and Coaching staffs would disagree with us.
I say us because I hated Melker... but coaches loved him, his teammates loved him he was good on the PK solid defensive forward and was selfless. There are parts of his game we will miss but I’m glad he isn’t here as his spot is now going to go to a prospect with better upside!

Or maybe it was just San Jose scouts and coaching staff since no one picked him up!


Peter Deboer loved him a lot, but Pete was always known to hate playing young guys and giving worse older guys the opportunities
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage