SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Revans292

Membre depuis
19 oct. 2020
Équipe favorite
Sharks de San Jose
Deuxième équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Messages dans les forums
355
Messages par jour
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GM5 janv. 2021 à 6 h 15
Sujet: Change of Scene
Roslovik to me is slightly better than Sorenson and he has publicly stated he wants out, crippling his trade value! your overpaying for him IMO.

Meir PLD and Labanc
That would make a very nice young top line for us with
Kane Hertl TBD
making a great (if healthy) second pairing.
Problem is I think your underpaying for PLD. He’s 22 3 seasons in and looks good! couture is 31 paid top line money till 38 that’s 3 years to many and that destroys his value, but you are right he’s the kinda guy Torts loves!!! But how long is Tort going to actually be there?
My feeling is PLD for Hertl and a 1st or 2nd is the value they want in return, and that’s a wash for us talent wise and fans would hate it.
Couture 2 mil retention plus 2021 1st and 1 of the new kids we just got would be a true starting point and though it’s fair value I feel the sharks Balk, just too much to give up!

wait till Chicago gets healthy and Strome is pushed back down to 3C, offer that first and a good prospect for him! Not quite the same player but he would really add something to our roster without taking away too much value!
Forum: Armchair-GM5 janv. 2021 à 2 h 58
Sujet: Here we go again - Cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bolts_Fan_Dan</b></div><div>Boston is definitely want a sweetener to take on MacDonagh’s whole salary so getting a 2 would not happen
All the RFA’s except Volkov take pay cuts?
Nashville bails us out with killorn?
This would be awesome but not seeing it.</div></div>

I see Johnson having a bounce back year and not costing nearly as much to trade, Killorn is a solid player, cousins is a significant step down but in a flat cap the value makes sense.
No way Boston take that deal unless macdonagh balls out next season.
Was hoping the sharks swoop Goodrow at 1.4-1.6 so if you guys like him then I think we’re out.
still the ideas here are solid though I think the next player gone is more likely Stamkos and Johnson, that would set you guys up to revamp and and not go into cap hell again.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 déc. 2020 à 0 h 33
Sujet: shrinked options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>yikes</b></div><div>The sharks can’t expose Karlsson......and it makes no sense to keep burns but not Karlsson lmfao. I’d rather lose burns 9.9/10 to Seattle than Karlsson. Karlsson is still very good and better than burns even while injured Karlsson has outperformed him. Burns still provides offensive production but defensively he fell off a cliff this past season while Karlsson has outperformed him offensively and played very solid defensively especially compared to burns.


The leafs also laugh at that offer. Sorensen is lighting up the 2nd tier Swedish league. It’s cool and impressive but nothing to write home about seeing as it is; a second tier league in an already weaker league system compared to others like the AHL and KHL. Maybe Sorensen could return a second if we’re like lucky and he plays well by TDL</div></div>

Karlsson won’t be traded as no one wants that contract, Bit defensively I watched Karlsson stand next to the net a d watch 15-20 goals scored on him with zero effort from him he is a horrible defensive player. Worse than burns by a lot!!!

<a href="https://youtu.be/BRjEIHnQf8w" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/BRjEIHnQf8w</a>
Forum: Armchair-GM10 déc. 2020 à 16 h 24
Sujet: Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>I don’t care what you remember, it isn’t what happened. If you want to propose a trade, don’t lead with a stupidly coy comment that is baseless to begin with.

Btw, Ottawa doesn’t need your locker room cancer, especially at $7MM per for five more seasons, lol, five seasons</div></div>

Kane isn’t a cancer, he is well liked and popular here. He also is 28 so five more years finish his contract to 33 which is about the life expectancy of your prime years as a power forward Maybe that last year sucks but the other four are still going to produce and produce well. The end of the day this is 100% fantasy never gonna happen the only reason I was Tasing Kane was he is the most tradable asset we have with a large contract.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 déc. 2020 à 15 h 42
Sujet: Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>Says then guy who starts off his thread description with idiotic take on a good trade, in an attempt to be funny, and it failed.

Again, look at the player Ryan was in his last two seasons in Anaheim, and that's who they knew they were getting, and got. Ignore the first two seasons in Anaheim because they are what he was, not what he was becoming.

As for Kane, get past the insults and idiotic comparisons, and then maybe we can discuss Kane, but until then, this is about you not understanding the trade you compared your trade to in the beginning.</div></div>

What?
Dude you need to get over yourself.

Your legitimately saying Ottawa was happy with the player they got? I remember from the get go Ottawa feeling Bobby was a bust, you don’t give 7 mil a year to a 45-50 point guys producing 15-20 goals. So give me all the attitude you want I still think your wrong.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 déc. 2020 à 14 h 25
Forum: Armchair-GM10 déc. 2020 à 14 h 20
Sujet: Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>"Kane is everything Ottawa was looking for when they signed Bobby Ryan except Kane is playing at his peek level and Bobby was on his way down.
I hate giving up Kane especially for so little but I see this as a 3 team trade and we get a nice haul of picks and 2 very solid albeit overpaid players to offset Kane’s loss."

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Ottawa wanted a right shot scoring winger to replace Alfredsson, that's what they were looking for. Ryan produced the same in Ottawa as Anaheim, except he didn't have Getzlaf feeding him anymore, and although Spezza is a good playmaker, he's no Getzlaf. So Ryan became more of a playmaker than a finisher, but he was already transitioning to that in Anaheim. The points per game didn't decline, until the hand injuries caught up with him.

Bobby Ryan
Ana 11/12 82 games 31G 26A 57pts 0.70 pts per game
Ana 12/13 46 games 11G 19A 30pts 0.65 pts per game (shortened season 48 games)
Ott 13/14 70 games 23G 25A 48pts 0.69 pts per game
Ott 14/15 78 games 18G 36A 54pts 0.69 pts per game
Ott 15/16 81 games 22G 34A 56pts 0.69 pts per game

<a href="https://www.bardown.com/bobby-ryan-has-the-absolute-worst-luck-with-hand-injuries-1.966864#:~:text=Over%20his%20ten%20year%20career,shot%20from%20defenceman%20Ron%20Hainsey" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.bardown.com/bobby-ryan-has-the-absolute-worst-luck-with-hand-injuries-1.966864#:~:text=Over%20his%20ten%20year%20career,shot%20from%20defenceman%20Ron%20Hainsey</a>.

Opposing players began to target Ryans hands.

So starting off with the an incorrect assumption, and an insult to Ryan, is just stupid, when you don't know the facts. Without even talking about the player you want to trade, you've managed to make yourself look like an idiot.</div></div>

Wow rude much dude? You don’t have to be an ass to get your point across.
Ottawa was looking for an aggressive playing power forward and finisher who checked hard and scored goals. Like ryan did in the 11/12 season,
Not the 11-23 goals a year they got.
Kane has been averaging 26-30 goals for the last 4 years checks Hard hits and is disruptive.
Yes they wanted an Alfredson replacement but
Didn’t get it. Kane is a LW not a RW I get that, But my statement is still accurate he is what Ottawa was looking for when the got Ryan save for the wing position.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 déc. 2020 à 0 h 37