SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ben Bishop

Créé par: OilLeakOver
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 23 sept. 2020
Publié: 23 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Better to go after Bishop or Kuemper? Too much for Galy?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
2.
3.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $75 922 699 $341 534 $730 000 $5 577 301 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
915 000 $915 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 sept. 2020 à 11 h 48
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
None of these trades are essentially bad, they just don't really make this team better.

Unless Bishop goes back to pre-2019-2020 goaltending, Turris doesn't disappear, and Galchenyuk goes back to scoring 30 goals.
a lot of what-if's
23 sept. 2020 à 11 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,913
Mentions "j'aime": 562
No to the Neal deal why trade for a worse contract with more yrs on it makes zero sense and it makes this team worse longer.
23 sept. 2020 à 11 h 57
#3
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Quoting: KMMHL2012
None of these trades are essentially bad, they just don't really make this team better.

Unless Bishop goes back to pre-2019-2020 goaltending, Turris doesn't disappear, and Galchenyuk goes back to scoring 30 goals.
a lot of what-if's


I agree with you but it is still a better team than last year with these add-on IMO... and everything at a cheap cost (no prospect, no 1st given)
Well job OiLeakOver
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
Quoting: DomCholette
I agree with you but it is still a better team than last year with these add-on IMO... and everything at a cheap cost (no prospect, no 1st given)
Well job OiLeakOver


marginally better, i'll agree, and that relies solely on if Bishop gets his game back.
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 6
#5
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Quoting: KMMHL2012
marginally better, i'll agree, and that relies solely on if Bishop gets his game back.


Bishop is better risk than Smith
Galch is a better risk than AA
Turris C depth is always good and better than Neal as Turris can play defensively with Nuge
But I am not saying that they become a cup pretender... more a better CupSuspect
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 12
#6
The other ones Drai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,860
Mentions "j'aime": 689
Good job
OilLeakOver a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 50
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: DomCholette
Bishop is better risk than Smith
Galch is a better risk than AA
Turris C depth is always good and better than Neal as Turris can play defensively with Nuge
But I am not saying that they become a cup pretender... more a better CupSuspect


They are still a couple years away but want to improve without mortgaging the future. Thanks for the insight.
TheDuminator a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 26
#8
Ouch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 540
Modifié 23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 31
Quoting: DomCholette
Bishop is better risk than Smith
Galch is a better risk than AA
Turris C depth is always good and better than Neal as Turris can play defensively with Nuge
But I am not saying that they become a cup pretender... more a better CupSuspect


Glach might come cheaper then AA too. But I don't think Turris for Neal straight up is fair value. Turris hasn't produced points as well as Neal just speaking last 4 seasons. Including Neal in Calgary. We already retained some cash on Lucic for Neal. The extra year plus 250000 or whatever is to much when it all said and done. When I read the rumour for this trade it stated Nashville would have to add a sweatner to make it happen. Turris does solve the 3C problem but will cost way to much cap wise. Would rather have Neal and solve it some other way.
TheDuminator a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 45
#9
My Balls Itch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: KMMHL2012
None of these trades are essentially bad, they just don't really make this team better.

Unless Bishop goes back to pre-2019-2020 goaltending, Turris doesn't disappear, and Galchenyuk goes back to scoring 30 goals.
a lot of what-if's


Pre 19-20 bishop? He was good this year just injury prone which everyone knows. Get him and a half decent backup and you're good.
23 sept. 2020 à 14 h 8
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
Quoting: DeadGuy63
Pre 19-20 bishop? He was good this year just injury prone which everyone knows. Get him and a half decent backup and you're good.


Khudobin was better, and Bishop isht the bed in his 3 playoff appearances.
23 sept. 2020 à 15 h 23
#11
My Balls Itch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: KMMHL2012
Khudobin was better, and Bishop isht the bed in his 3 playoff appearances.


Just because Khudobin was better doesn't mean Bishop was bad. I also wouldn't call a .921, .939, and .933 in the playoffs ****ting the bed.
23 sept. 2020 à 15 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
Quoting: DeadGuy63
Just because Khudobin was better doesn't mean Bishop was bad. I also wouldn't call a .921, .939, and .933 in the playoffs ****ting the bed.


what part of "go back to pre-2019-2020" were you struggling with?... those are all pre-2019-2020 numbers you quoted.

his 2019-2020 playoffs was a 5.43 and .844 in 3 game played.... therefore, ****ting the bed.
23 sept. 2020 à 16 h 35
#13
My Balls Itch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: KMMHL2012
what part of "go back to pre-2019-2020" were you struggling with?... those are all pre-2019-2020 numbers you quoted.

his 2019-2020 playoffs was a 5.43 and .844 in 3 game played.... therefore, ****ting the bed.


Ok miss understood what you meant. I thought you meant the other 3 years he was in the playoffs. If the 3 games he played this year he was hurt in at least 2 and the Vegas game if I’m not mistaken was the first game back from the break and was a round robin which players have said they didn’t care about and just treated like pre season.
CallingOutHomers a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage