SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cheaper Bottom 6 and RD Overhaul

Créé par: TheAlien
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 22 sept. 2020
Publié: 22 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
32 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
54 800 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Cernak, Erik4 000 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Beagle, Jay
  2. Karlsson, Linus [Liste de réserve]
  3. Stecher, Troy [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere
NJD
  1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
3.
TBL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
4.
VAN
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas [Droits de RFA]
EDM
    Not Qualified
    Rachats de contrats
    Frais appliqués
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de ANA
    2021
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $78 015 212 $1 700 000 $4 750 000 $3 484 788 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 366 666 $3 366 666 $
    AG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 sept. 2020 à 14 h 26
    #1
    14m in dead cap
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 3,602
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,084
    Why would the Wild essentially just give Greenway away? He's still young and has a chance of developing into a solid power forward. If they're going to trade him, the return has to make some form of sense.
    22 sept. 2020 à 14 h 30
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,900
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
    Quoting: JayTea
    Why would the Wild essentially just give Greenway away? He's still young and has a chance of developing into a solid power forward. If they're going to trade him, the return has to make some form of sense.


    He's honestly just a placeholder I was just looking for a RW with some size. I'll just replace him with Athanasiou to make it more realistic
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 9
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 199
    Mentions "j'aime": 40
    Few thoughts on my personal opinion. I think Cernak is a great partner for Hughes whether it be offersheet or trade. I feel like giving up a first for two year of Manson is a lot. I know you get to dump Beagle in the deal but essentially Manson and Cernak bring similar skill sets.. so I feel a puck moving dman that can drive transitional play and run a second power play would be good to pair with Edler. As for big RW as a place holder.. they have Zack in the system who fits that description who would cost under a million dollar a year. Not sure if he is ready for 3rd line deployment if that’s the case Leivo is a better fit than AA. Pacquette is a waste of a pick if Sutter is being healthy scratched. Although overpaid Sutter brings as much value as Cedric in a 4th line capacity. Also signing Toffoli will cost them the 4th round pick you gave away in that trade as it is conditioned on the Toffoli trade. Finally I don’t think it is wise to rush Hoglander to the NHL. Let him season a year in the AHL if it happens get used to North America sized ice and I think he would be ready to make the jump next season. Overall good thoughts just my honest assessment on your post
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 9
    #4
    GO BOLTS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 1,406
    Mentions "j'aime": 388
    not going to let Cernack get away.
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 40
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 309
    Mentions "j'aime": 60
    sven is not going on LTIR
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 41
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,900
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
    Quoting: major_hassle
    sven is not going on LTIR


    I forgot he was there just assume they agree to terminate his contract doesn't really matter
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 42
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,900
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
    Quoting: jasalex
    not going to let Cernack get away.


    Good luck keeping him at that cap hit
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 50
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 309
    Mentions "j'aime": 60
    Quoting: TheAlien
    I forgot he was there just assume they agree to terminate his contract doesn't really matter


    I think there's a better chance that Eriksson goes for the mutual termination if his agent can find him a ~2 million a year deal somewhere else, since he only has 5 million owed over 2 seasons.
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 52
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,900
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
    Quoting: cbreezy14
    Few thoughts on my personal opinion. I think Cernak is a great partner for Hughes whether it be offersheet or trade. I feel like giving up a first for two year of Manson is a lot. I know you get to dump Beagle in the deal but essentially Manson and Cernak bring similar skill sets.. so I feel a puck moving dman that can drive transitional play and run a second power play would be good to pair with Edler. As for big RW as a place holder.. they have Zack in the system who fits that description who would cost under a million dollar a year. Not sure if he is ready for 3rd line deployment if that’s the case Leivo is a better fit than AA. Pacquette is a waste of a pick if Sutter is being healthy scratched. Although overpaid Sutter brings as much value as Cedric in a 4th line capacity. Also signing Toffoli will cost them the 4th round pick you gave away in that trade as it is conditioned on the Toffoli trade. Finally I don’t think it is wise to rush Hoglander to the NHL. Let him season a year in the AHL if it happens get used to North America sized ice and I think he would be ready to make the jump next season. Overall good thoughts just my honest assessment on your post


    I didn't really know who to pair who with on the defense so I'd be open to switching them. I would've been open to bringing in a more of puck moving dman if we hadn't signed Myers, plus I see Rathbone being that 2nd unit PP QB in a few years anyways. I think they need to focus on being more defensively sound and I think it take both Manson and Cernak to do it. I also thought about putting Macewen on the 3rd line but I agree that I don't think he is ready for the 3rd line yet. I also forgot about the condition on the Toffoli signing but I'm not really a fan of Sutter which is why I brought in Paquette I just think he's faster and willing to be more physical. I also don't think there is going to be an AHL season so I think giving him sheltered minutes on the 3rd line is much more significant to his development then sending back to the SHL. I'm also pretty sure I read an interview from him saying he wouldn't go to the AHL anyways. But I appreciate your thoughts
    cbreezy14 a aimé ceci.
    22 sept. 2020 à 15 h 53
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,900
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
    Quoting: major_hassle
    I think there's a better chance that Eriksson goes for the mutual termination if his agent can find him a ~2 million a year deal somewhere else, since he only has 5 million owed over 2 seasons.


    I mean that would be amazing but I'd be skeptical of that happening I think we're gonna be stuck with him until next year
    22 sept. 2020 à 16 h 7
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 309
    Mentions "j'aime": 60
    Quoting: TheAlien
    I mean that would be amazing but I'd be skeptical of that happening I think we're gonna be stuck with him until next year


    We'll see, but if Eriksson was UFA this summer I'd be happy to have him on the canucks for 2 million a year, so I imagine another team might think similarly.
    22 sept. 2020 à 16 h 49
    #12
    GO BOLTS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 1,406
    Mentions "j'aime": 388
    Quoting: TheAlien
    Good luck keeping him at that cap hit


    thank you. 4 OS in 10 years none accepted. We are fine.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage