SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ok lets try this again without LTIR this time LOL

Créé par: F50marco
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 15 sept. 2020
Publié: 15 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ok so LTIR is a no go lol. Thought I was genius there for a second. So it appears it has to be the number crunching game at its finest. Meaning it means losing Cirelli and/or Sergachev and/or Cernak by OS or trade where they get less than full value in return OR Tampa makes the hard decision on 5 key but older expendable players. Luxury players on a team that can't afford them.

So its pretty simple:

-Cap casualties have to be Killorn, Coleman, Paquette, Coburn and McElhinney. If you got to pay to shed them, so be it. Outside Coburn the other should be easy to move without it costing TB.
-Replace 5 players above with league minimum contract players. Plenty of hungry UFA's looking for 1 year low cost deals to play in TB i'm sure so no biggie.
-Delay this cap hell situation 1 more year - Seattle will be able to take a decent roster player to help the cap situation to resign the RFA's again and some players NTC/NMC will move from full clause to limited # of teams clause which will make trading them easier. Johnson and Palat. Giving even more cap space next year.

Lines and players used are just quickly added for reference. The cap hit is what is important here.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
13 250 000 $
13 250 000 $
11 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Any team.
2.
TBL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Any team.
BOS
  1. Coleman, Blake
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
3.
TBL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Any te.......who are we kidding... its MTL
4.
TBL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Any team.
5.
TBL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Any team that Coburn accepts and will get playing time on. A 2nd rounder for year of 1.7M should be an easy yes for any of those teams. if its less, than so be it. Im just assuming worst case scenario here.
DAL
  1. Coburn, Braydon
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de PHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TBL
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de BOS
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de ANA
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 356 757 $0 $132 500 $143 243 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
759 258 $759 258 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
833 333 $833 333 $
AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 sept. 2020 à 0 h 35
#1
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Foote making the team kills this
15 sept. 2020 à 0 h 56
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,614
Mentions "j'aime": 6,752
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Foote making the team kills this


I think its pretty safe to say, they'll be playing Foote in the minors one more year for this to work or making sure he doesn't reach any of his bonuses at the very least. Not ideal of course but necessary in this scenario.
15 sept. 2020 à 0 h 57
#3
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: F50marco
I think its pretty safe to say, they'll be playing Foote in the minors one more year for this to work or making sure he doesn't reach any of his bonuses at the very least. Not ideal of course but necessary in this scenario.


or even sergachev asking for the slightest raise because hes definitely earned it
15 sept. 2020 à 1 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,190
Mentions "j'aime": 304
Maybe I'm wrong, but that seems insultingly low for Sergachev. Maybe Cirelli can be talked into 3.25m though.
I still think my idea of trading for 50% retention on an already low cap hit (like the Kovalchuk trade to Washington) is a good move for Tampa.
15 sept. 2020 à 1 h 40
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Good job Marco 👍
15 sept. 2020 à 10 h 49
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Hey thats not a terrible trade for the Bruins I suppose!
Idk if they want another middle 6 winger, they got a lot. But also Coleman plays a bruins brand of hockey

Interesting!
15 sept. 2020 à 15 h 0
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,267
Mentions "j'aime": 283
id rather pay to move Johnson before i move Coleman
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 28
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,614
Mentions "j'aime": 6,752
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
or even sergachev asking for the slightest raise because hes definitely earned it


I mean listen, there's no way to know this early on what those guys are thinking and if they are willing to take less or not but for the sake of this AGM, I assumed they all accepted 1 year deals at less than deserve. The promise of getting what they deserve once a couple contracts come off the books.

Considering so many other stud players on their team took less when their time came, I don't think its unreasonable. I mean its only year and its still millions of dollars. Not peanuts.
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 29
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,614
Mentions "j'aime": 6,752
Quoting: MGK
Maybe I'm wrong, but that seems insultingly low for Sergachev. Maybe Cirelli can be talked into 3.25m though.
I still think my idea of trading for 50% retention on an already low cap hit (like the Kovalchuk trade to Washington) is a good move for Tampa.


They are 1 year deals. These guys are still RFA's at the end of the day.
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 30
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,614
Mentions "j'aime": 6,752
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Hey thats not a terrible trade for the Bruins I suppose!
Idk if they want another middle 6 winger, they got a lot. But also Coleman plays a bruins brand of hockey

Interesting!


Didn't really go in too deep on realistic values here. The goal was to try and make the team cap compliant more than anything while keeping the core together.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 32
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,614
Mentions "j'aime": 6,752
Quoting: HowYouDrouin
id rather pay to move Johnson before i move Coleman


I basically went on the idea that any of the NTC/NMC's making 5M+ weren't willing to waive their clauses. If they do then yes for sure Johnson moving out would make this a lot easier.

I kind of tried to do a "worst case scenario" in regards to not being able to move those guys at all. Killorn only has a limited NTC so it should be much easier so I moved him instead.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage