If that's the price I'd consider.

same here. but they chemistry that strome and panarin had this year is worth a lot to a team

Danault is actually a perfect fit for the Rangers at 2C. They have assets to trade too

I agree. My only complaint/problem is i believe in chemistry. strome had chemistry with panarin so i am borderline

Only real issues I have with this rumour is we need a scoring winger not another center or another LHD prospect. The 1st is nice and I believe Danault would definitely fill a huge need for the Rangers.

IMO lafreniere is that scoring winger and kakko is getting there. next year our scoring wingers could be laf, kakko, and kreider. Panarin is a playmaker and buch is also a playmaker (look back at the march 5 game where mika scored 5 goals and buch had the crazy assist on goal number 3). I love strome but danault is a good fit..

Value wise it is close but doesn't fit MTL Need...
If we trade Danault it won't be for another lower Quality C.. it need to be for a TOP winger
BUch would be my target with something else... maybe your 3rd RD

could the deal be Gauthier, Robertson and a 1st for Danault. or is it set for Buch + 2nd for danault? what would it be?

Sorry I should have specified, Habs need the scoring winger and not another center or LHD prospect.

I see something like Danault + Brook for DeAngelo + Buchnevic

MTL would be stupid to accept that trade. Danault is worth more

ok so then buch and a 2nd i guess

i dont think deangelo is traded. maybe buch and a 2nd for danault

Buch & 2nd would be for Domi IMO... not enough for the Habs to let go Danault... need to be a overpay

even as a rental where he could leave the next summer for nothing? feel like a lesser tavares situation