SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs Revamped post Dubas press conference

Créé par: Benchwarmer4Life
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 août 2020
Publié: 13 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Don’t ask me how we can afford the RFA s the year after but here we go.

Nylander trade is cap dump for quality futures. Nashville gets established player.

LA deal is again cap dump but get young RD who plays 15-20min. No idea if he kills penalties

Pietrangelo (or other decent UFA dman) to fill need on right side

Also so curious to see if big buff can still play and if he catches on with a contender for low dollars
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2785 000 $
21 300 000 $
21 350 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1725 000 $
78 800 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Roy, Matt
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
2.
TOR
  1. Tolvanen, Eeli
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NSH
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 647 416 $0 $3 250 000 $852 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 août 2020 à 22 h 55
#1
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
I just find this never ending cycle so funny.
TOR fan base complains that they spent too much money on their top 4 and now they don’t have enough money to get F depth or Defence.

Then everyone proposes trading away one of the expensive big 4, only to then go and spend 8-10 mil on just signing Pietro lmao
13 août 2020 à 22 h 59
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 37
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Very true... the need is top right dman... only way to get them is draft (takes too long if not a rebuilding team), trade (giving away a good asset like Nylander or Marner) or UFA ( usually means over pay)

As I see it the UFA dmen that could play the right side are limited to 1-3 and 1 (Tanev gets injured a lot)
13 août 2020 à 22 h 59
#3
The 1 True GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Why do people continue to over value Roy????
13 août 2020 à 23 h 2
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 37
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Probably because he’s cheap and it’s hard to fit anyone into this cap... plus going through this I find it hard to find teams that actually have what we need and need what we have. Then fit it all under the cap
13 août 2020 à 23 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 8
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: McRanteskog
I just find this never ending cycle so funny.
TOR fan base complains that they spent too much money on their top 4 and now they don’t have enough money to get F depth or Defence.

Then everyone proposes trading away one of the expensive big 4, only to then go and spend 8-10 mil on just signing Pietro lmao


Yeah I think a lot of people think that spreading the $ around (aka moving a forward to spend some $ on D) will cure the ails of the club. Biggest problem I have with this lineup is I dont think Nylander is going anywhere so if forwards are going out its likely Johnsson/Kapanen, I also think the org has a higher opinion of both Mikheyav and Barbanov then u have them listed as.

Imo Mik/Tavares/Willy starts the year as line 2, Robertson/Kerfoot/Barbs is line 3 and they use the trades to pick up a D around the $3-4m range and some depth/grit options and maybe some picks to bolster the prospect pool a little bit (I did a GM sim based on this on the site if u wanna take a look)
Benchwarmer4Life a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 23 h 13
#6
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: GreenM55
Yeah I think a lot of people think that spreading the $ around (aka moving a forward to spend some $ on D) will cure the ails of the club. Biggest problem I have with this lineup is I dont think Nylander is going anywhere so if forwards are going out its likely Johnsson/Kapanen, I also think the org has a higher opinion of both Mikheyav and Barbanov then u have them listed as.

Imo Mik/Tavares/Willy starts the year as line 2, Robertson/Kerfoot/Barbs is line 3 and they use the trades to pick up a D around the $3-4m range and some depth/grit options and maybe some picks to bolster the prospect pool a little bit (I did a GM sim based on this on the site if u wanna take a look)


I personally think that the solution for Toronto would be be moving Nylander plus one of Johansson or Kapanen. Then taking that 10 mil cap space and get yourself two 5 mil D men (NOT one 10mil Petro).

Move a Nylander and target a Pesce or Klingberg or Parayko. Then take Kapanen and trade him for a 4-5 d man like a Zadorov or Montour type player.

Riley - Parayko/Klingberg/Pesce
Muzzin - Holl
Dermott - Zadorov
13 août 2020 à 23 h 15
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 37
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I could see those moves for sure... Zadarov intrigues me but he plays the left side
13 août 2020 à 23 h 22
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,998
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
As a rebuilding team, the Kings will not be trading a 2nd round pick.
14 août 2020 à 3 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,615
Mentions "j'aime": 6,169
Quoting: Sean4417
Why do people continue to over value Roy????


I don't think anyone overvalues Roy. I just think enough people realize that there Kings aren't going to trade him for "fair value." If Toronto offers his value in a trade, the Kings will just say no and keep him, because he's worth more to them than anything that Toronto is going to be willing to offer up.
KINGS67 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage