SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

RFA UFA Small Trades

Créé par: jcambers
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 5 août 2020
Publié: 5 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
UFA: Gustafsson (looks good on PP1), depth/2-way contracts, Talbot walks for bigger contract
RFA: Mangiapane is a real deal 2nd liner, Kylington as depth, Janko doesn't get a QO
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
32 333 333 $
2825 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
52 200 000 $
2900 000 $
1815 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 125 000 $
54 417 500 $
22 125 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (COL)
OTT
  1. Ryan, Derek (125 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de COL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 792 499 $0 $457 500 $11 707 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 417 500 $4 417 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
815 000 $815 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 août 2020 à 10 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,663
Mentions "j'aime": 19,757
Dont trade Ryan, dont sign Hamonic and Gus isnt signing that for that long. No need for Simmonds just give Gawdin a chance
5 août 2020 à 10 h 15
#2
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,663
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Gus might cost more, but he's an investment worth making. Third d-pair with a good partner and time on PP1 and I honestly think he could be back to 40-50 points easy. Haven't watched too much of Calgary but from what I've seen, he's back to his 18-19 form
5 août 2020 à 10 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,018
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Dont trade Ryan, dont sign Hamonic and Gus isnt signing that for that long. No need for Simmonds just give Gawdin a chance


i agree, gus isnt taking that contract & it would b stupid 2 sign that hamonic deal
5 août 2020 à 10 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,018
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Gus might cost more, but he's an investment worth making. Third d-pair with a good partner and time on PP1 and I honestly think he could be back to 40-50 points easy. Haven't watched too much of Calgary but from what I've seen, he's back to his 18-19 form


cgy might put him with gio b/c hanifin & valimaki probably need a partner that is better defensively
5 août 2020 à 10 h 33
#5
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,663
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: cgy_flame_fan
cgy might put him with gio b/c hanifin & valimaki probably need a partner that is better defensively


That's an option too, although I think one of the reasons Chicago's defense was so atrociously bad the year Gustafsson went off was because he was getting so much ice time on the top pair with Keith. Obviously he was outstanding in the OZ and in transition, but he's not good defensively and probably never will be. So maybe Gio can carry the load in that situation and that pairing can work really well. But I do have concerns about giving a guy is is flat-out bad in his own zone 20-22 minutes a game in all situations. In fairness, I thought he was a bit better this year when he was in Chicago, but his role was reduced, especially once Boqvist came up.

But like I said, I think he really fits in Calgary and they'd be smart to keep him. They'd make a fan out of me for doing it too lol
jcambers a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 10 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,018
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
That's an option too, although I think one of the reasons Chicago's defense was so atrociously bad the year Gustafsson went off was because he was getting so much ice time on the top pair with Keith. Obviously he was outstanding in the OZ and in transition, but he's not good defensively and probably never will be. So maybe Gio can carry the load in that situation and that pairing can work really well. But I do have concerns about giving a guy is is flat-out bad in his own zone 20-22 minutes a game in all situations. In fairness, I thought he was a bit better this year when he was in Chicago, but his role was reduced, especially once Boqvist came up.

But like I said, I think he really fits in Calgary and they'd be smart to keep him. They'd make a fan out of me for doing it too lol


hhhhhhhmmmmmm, good point but yah if they dont extend him they r stupid
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
6 août 2020 à 13 h 20
#7
Démarrer sujet
jcambers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 689
Mentions "j'aime": 118
Quoting: cgy_flame_fan
cgy might put him with gio b/c hanifin & valimaki probably need a partner that is better defensively


I'm not sure I would ever include Hanifin in the sentence "better defensively"
6 août 2020 à 18 h 53
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,018
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: jcambers
I'm not sure I would ever include Hanifin in the sentence "better defensively"


wtf, h i literally said he was bad defensively
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage