SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs 2021 Incorporating feedback from previous post

Créé par: CapGuy
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 juill. 2020
Publié: 26 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
11 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
21 700 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de ARI
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 483 950 $0 $0 $16 050 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
737 500 $737 500 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juill. 2020 à 13 h 39
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
This works for me. Not a big fan of paying the 2nd to sign Clifford but it is certainly plausible.
CapGuy a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2020 à 13 h 39
#2
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Johnsson is worth 2nd. Not 3rd and another late pick. Just 2nd rounder. That one was a correct value you put up in first one.
CapGuy a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2020 à 13 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Jamiepo
This works for me. Not a big fan of paying the 2nd to sign Clifford but it is certainly plausible.


I agree. This deal is dependent on the value Clifford brings in the playoffs. If Dubas looks at Clifford as the final piece to get over the hurdle and he’s a good dressing room guy I’m ok to lose the 2nd. But if he just fills a regular 4th line role I’m ok to walk away. You don’t sign him for regular season, you sign him for the playoffs. I already like the impact he’s had on Kapanen’s physicality.
26 juill. 2020 à 13 h 43
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: SammyT_51
Johnsson is worth 2nd. Not 3rd and another late pick. Just 2nd rounder. That one was a correct value you put up in first one.


Quoting: SammyT_51
Johnsson is worth 2nd. Not 3rd and another late pick. Just 2nd rounder. That one was a correct value you put up in first one.


I agree completely but I don’t think the return is important. Engvall and Johnsson for futures, resign Clifford.
CapGuy a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2020 à 13 h 46
#5
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: CapGuy
I agree. This deal is dependent on the value Clifford brings in the playoffs. If Dubas looks at Clifford as the final piece to get over the hurdle and he’s a good dressing room guy I’m ok to lose the 2nd. But if he just fills a regular 4th line role I’m ok to walk away. You don’t sign him for regular season, you sign him for the playoffs. I already like the impact he’s had on Kapanen’s physicality.


Absolutely agree. Turned kappy into scrappy lol. Has a great attitude and work ethic. Playoffs will determine which direction we need to go in a few areas.
CapGuy a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
That's a bit higher on Dermott for a 1 year deal than I'd like.
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 15
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: EnvironmentalTwister
That's a bit higher on Dermott for a 1 year deal than I'd like.


I’m making the assumption that he proves himself next season
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: CapGuy
I’m making the assumption that he proves himself next season


For 21-22, sure.

but next year he doesn't have arb rights or heavy point totals for a large raise
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: EnvironmentalTwister
For 21-22, sure.

but next year he doesn't have arb rights or heavy point totals for a large raise


You’re right sorry I thought you were commenting on my 2021 post
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 17
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: CapGuy
You’re right sorry I thought you were commenting on my 2021 post


No problem. I'll guess Dermott get 1 x 1 this offseason or 2 x 1.2. Anything above that only works on a long term deal and I'm not 100% sure I want to sign Dermott long term just yet.
CapGuy a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Engvall is better than clifford by a fair margin and now youre paying Clifford more to do that less
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 41
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: CapGuy
I agree. This deal is dependent on the value Clifford brings in the playoffs. If Dubas looks at Clifford as the final piece to get over the hurdle and he’s a good dressing room guy I’m ok to lose the 2nd. But if he just fills a regular 4th line role I’m ok to walk away. You don’t sign him for regular season, you sign him for the playoffs. I already like the impact he’s had on Kapanen’s physicality.


pro tip guys like clifford are never that guy
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 49
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Engvall is better than clifford by a fair margin and now youre paying Clifford more to do that less


I’m not sure I agree. For some reason people think the leafs need offence from their 4th line. Sure if you compare stats and overall player Engvall offers more. But Clifford is the only player on the leafs that change the momentum in a playoff game with his physicality. It’s funny because fans ripped Dubas for lacking toughness. So he trades for a great locker room guy and one of the toughest in the NhL, and now we want to keep Engvall?
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 51
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
pro tip guys like clifford are never that guy


We will see this year. All it takes is a couple big hits in a playoff game to change momentum. Leafs have never had that. Blue, Bruins, Vegas, etc. all have those guys
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 54
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: CapGuy
We will see this year. All it takes is a couple big hits in a playoff game to change momentum. Leafs have never had that. Blue, Bruins, Vegas, etc. all have those guys


Yeah, that doesnt happen. 4th liners throwing big hits on other 4th liners doesnt change momentum
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 54
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: CapGuy
I’m not sure I agree. For some reason people think the leafs need offence from their 4th line. Sure if you compare stats and overall player Engvall offers more. But Clifford is the only player on the leafs that change the momentum in a playoff game with his physicality. It’s funny because fans ripped Dubas for lacking toughness. So he trades for a great locker room guy and one of the toughest in the NhL, and now we want to keep Engvall?


he literally is better at everything and toughness doesnt matter if you are worse at all the actual hockey things
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 56
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, that doesnt happen. 4th liners throwing big hits on other 4th liners doesnt change momentum


We’ll just have to disagree on this one. I have a feeling we’ll be having a different conversation after the playoffs are over and we see why Dubas brought Clifford in.
26 juill. 2020 à 14 h 59
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: CapGuy
We’ll just have to disagree on this one. I have a feeling we’ll be having a different conversation after the playoffs are over and we see why Dubas brought Clifford in.


He brought over clifford for cheap depth to make up for the loss of Trevor more and because clifford is decent defensively for a 4th line guy.
Since being a leaf clifford has shown himself to be entirely replacable.
Even when he was at peak during the kings cup runs he was their least used player by a wide margine, both in the regular season and playoffs and even more drastically during important games
26 juill. 2020 à 15 h 1
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
he literally is better at everything and toughness doesnt matter if you are worse at all the actual hockey things


Great thing about sports is the players solve these debates for us. I’ll be the first to admit that Engvall has a bigger impact than Clifford in the playoffs. No sense in arguing over it. I love Clifford as a player and he’s one of the few players on the Leafs that has won a cup.
26 juill. 2020 à 15 h 2
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
He brought over clifford for cheap depth to make up for the loss of Trevor more and because clifford is decent defensively for a 4th line guy.
Since being a leaf clifford has shown himself to be entirely replacable.
Even when he was at peak during the kings cup runs he was their least used player by a wide margine, both in the regular season and playoffs and even more drastically during important games


Clifford is better than Moore. Moore literally was a 4th liner
CapGuy a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2020 à 15 h 2
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 53
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
He brought over clifford for cheap depth to make up for the loss of Trevor more and because clifford is decent defensively for a 4th line guy.
Since being a leaf clifford has shown himself to be entirely replacable.
Even when he was at peak during the kings cup runs he was their least used player by a wide margine, both in the regular season and playoffs and even more drastically during important games


I look forward to the playoffs smile
26 juill. 2020 à 15 h 3
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: CapGuy
Great thing about sports is the players solve these debates for us. I’ll be the first to admit that Engvall has a bigger impact than Clifford in the playoffs. No sense in arguing over it. I love Clifford as a player and he’s one of the few players on the Leafs that has won a cup.


Clifford and engvall have already shown us who is better through their play. And winning a cup doesnt mean anything other than he was on a team that won a up
26 juill. 2020 à 15 h 5
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: EnvironmentalTwister
Clifford is better than Moore. Moore literally was a 4th liner


well yeah, so is clifford. clifford has been a 4th liner for like 10 years. Just because he replaced a guy doesnt mean he isnt better, moore was also dirt cheap, thats why LA retained. A better 4th liner is still a 4th limer
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage