SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2020 w Laf

Créé par: gregb569
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 29 juin 2020
Publié: 29 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/1769834

Essentially the same thing as the link above with the minor differences of course being winning the Lafrenire sweepstakes and Riikola being left off the roster.

I can't even begin to imagine the damage this forward core could do. This top 6 is absolutely STACKED and the 3rd line is IMO, without a doubt a top 3-5 in all of hockey. Not to mention our 4th line was one of, if not the best in all of hockey...

Our only weakness would be 3rd line D and if Murray can return to form. If they hold up, it would be a cup or bust season.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
43 500 000 $
13 750 000 $
1845 000 $
21 000 000 $
2810 000 $
2867 500 $
1833 750 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 300 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lafrenire, Alexis
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
ANA
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Placeholder, this can be done with any team who's willing. Moving Bjugstad frees up a decent chunk of cap space we desperately need. JJ is most likely going nowhere, and I highly doubt they trade Horny this offseason, so it has to be Jugs. Willing to package as much as a 4th to "get rid" of this contract, although I don't expect it to really cost anything.
2.
PIT
  1. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
SJS
  1. Jarry, Tristan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Rodrigues, Evan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
SJ gets a drastic upgrade in net + capable middle 6/bottom 6 F. Not sure if SJ is willing to move Labanc at this point, but it solves their most glaring weakness.
3.
PIT
ANA
  1. Riikola, Juuso [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Any team/leaves for Europe
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 492 675 $0 $850 000 $4 007 325 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Lafrenire, Alexis
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
867 500 $867 500 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juin 2020 à 9 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
I'm gonna be so pissed if we don't sign Riikola, he's literally the 5th best d man on the team (at worst)
29 juin 2020 à 10 h 1
#2
Démarrer sujet
gregb569
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: AFOX10900
I'm gonna be so pissed if we don't sign Riikola, he's literally the 5th best d man on the team (at worst)


For whatever reason idk why Sully doesn't like him.
Also, dunno where he fits with JJ on the squad, he is 100% going to play over Juuso (unfortunately)
Doubt Sully plays him on his off-side because he hates doing that lol..
Management + Sully also LOVE Ruhwedel so he'll be the 7th for sure (I like Chad but think Riikola is better TBH)

I 100% agree with your talent evaluation of JR, just don't see him sticking around being the 8th defenceman due to Sullys unwillingness to play him
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2020 à 10 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: gregb569
For whatever reason idk why Sully doesn't like him.
Also, dunno where he fits with JJ on the squad, he is 100% going to play over Juuso (unfortunately)
Doubt Sully plays him on his off-side because he hates doing that lol..
Management + Sully also LOVE Ruhwedel so he'll be the 7th for sure (I like Chad but think Riikola is better TBH)

I 100% agree with your talent evaluation of JR, just don't see him sticking around being the 8th defenceman due to Sullys unwillingness to play him


yeah I agree, I'm just saying it's stupid, and we should play him lol
gregb569 a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2020 à 10 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
The value is fair but the deal fills one hole for the sharks while another becomes bigger. Cant do it.
29 juin 2020 à 10 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Sharks aren’t looking to move Labanc as we have zero right handed forwards
Eldoser a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2020 à 10 h 55
#6
Démarrer sujet
gregb569
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: Jexus
The value is fair but the deal fills one hole for the sharks while another becomes bigger. Cant do it.


I respectfully disagree. The #1 issue the Sharks have is goaltending, bar none.
29 juin 2020 à 11 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: gregb569
I respectfully disagree. The #1 issue the Sharks have is goaltending, bar none.


Disagree all you want. I watch the sharks every game for 21 years. They have one fringe top six RW (labanc) that was a major problem last year. Remove him and we have none. So yeah, this deal doesnt work. Sorry.
Eldoser et papishark a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2020 à 17 h 26
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,228
Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
Quoting: gregb569
I respectfully disagree. The #1 issue the Sharks have is goaltending, bar none.


It's not that goaltending isn't an issue, it's that Rodrigues and a 2022 4th don't fit our needs at all. I like the trade from a Jarry standpoint, but everything else is completely useless to us.
30 juin 2020 à 5 h 26
#9
Démarrer sujet
gregb569
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
It's not that goaltending isn't an issue, it's that Rodrigues and a 2022 4th don't fit our needs at all. I like the trade from a Jarry standpoint, but everything else is completely useless to us.


Jarry for Labanc IMO is a fair 1 for 1. Starting goalie for a top 6 wing is fair, no matter which way you cut it. The 4th and ERod are extras
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage