SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks

Créé par: Ducks
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 28 juin 2020
Publié: 28 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
2775 000 $
22 600 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
2.
ANA
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (STL)
CAR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 989 027 $0 $850 000 $13 510 973 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juin 2020 à 7 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Not sure I am a big believer in Weegar. Kid looks like a #4, but seems injury prone. We need less injury prone players, not more. I think with us not winning the draft, moving Rakell makes a lot less sense than it did before, especially considering we may get lucky and draft Drysdale. Personally, I would only really consider moving Rakell for help at RD. This isn't to say that we shouldn't consider moving him later in the year. If Comtois breaks out, Rakell becomes expendable and he'd probably bring in a nice haul at the TDL.

Mrazek is a solid add. I wouldn't be disappointed in that deal. He's fun to watch and we have the money.
Ducks a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2020 à 8 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,285
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
I get goalies don’t have a ton of trade value but Mrazek is a 3rd or 4th round pick. Not swapping 50 spaces in the 6-7 rounds.
28 juin 2020 à 9 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: mytduxfan
Not sure I am a big believer in Weegar. Kid looks like a #4, but seems injury prone. We need less injury prone players, not more. I think with us not winning the draft, moving Rakell makes a lot less sense than it did before, especially considering we may get lucky and draft Drysdale. Personally, I would only really consider moving Rakell for help at RD. This isn't to say that we shouldn't consider moving him later in the year. If Comtois breaks out, Rakell becomes expendable and he'd probably bring in a nice haul at the TDL.

Mrazek is a solid add. I wouldn't be disappointed in that deal. He's fun to watch and we have the money.


til Weegar was the best d man on FLA for most of the year (playing a lot of top pair on his offside with Ekblad) and I wouldn't say get lucky and draft Drysdale, even if he's available, there's gonna be a better player available, even if nobody reaches for a Perfetti or smth, there will still be Lundell available at least, and if someone does reach for Perfetti, one of Raymond Rossi or Stutzle will be available, and we'd be idiots to take Drysdale over any of them
28 juin 2020 à 9 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: AFOX10900
til Weegar was the best d man on FLA for most of the year (playing a lot of top pair on his offside with Ekblad) and I wouldn't say get lucky and draft Drysdale, even if he's available, there's gonna be a better player available, even if nobody reaches for a Perfetti or smth, there will still be Lundell available at least, and if someone does reach for Perfetti, one of Raymond Rossi or Stutzle will be available, and we'd be idiots to take Drysdale over any of them


Fair enough, but Weegar's injury-prone nature makes him a no go for me. Didn't we kind of just move Kase for the same reason?

In terms of the draft, I completely agree. Personally, I am not that high on Drysdale. He seems like another Fowler based on what I've read, maybe with high scoring potential. In any event, we need a Hedman. I think he's being pushed up the draft due to the lack of good D-men this year, same as when Haydyn Fleury was drafted in 2014 (CAR could have drafted W. Nylander or Ehlers). My guess would be we get Raymond. Seems like a perfect fit for us with all the other Swedes on roster and is another kid playing in the SHL like Lundestrom. I just hope we don't get Perfetti. IMO, his compete level is too low for him to be an impact player in the NHL and, whilst impressive on the puck, his defensive game is extremely weak. His skating is also very average.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage