SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eichel Demands a Trade

Créé par: braisman
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 28 mai 2020
Publié: 28 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
67 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Who Wants to win Cup, Old Player
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Grzelcyk, Matt [Droits de RFA]
  3. Studnicka, Jack
  4. Vaakanainen, Urho
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Any team
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYI
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 355 889 $964 222 $1 550 000 $144 111 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Who Wants to win Cup, Old Player
700 000 $700 000 $
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 mai 2020 à 17 h 43
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
As a fan of neither team you guys are arguing about which secondary players are better than which secondary players. They are all secondary players. Eichel is the best player in the above trade and it is not remotely close. He is something that half the teams in the NHL wish they had, a true super elite franchise centre. Debrusk being better or worse or equal to Olofsson is completely irrelevant. Eichel wants out and Boston wants him, it would absolutely start with Pastrnak and it would be a significant price in addition to that. I don't think it would be unrealistic for Buffalo to want McAvoy or at least Carlo + as well.


Lol @CatmanV is a fan of neither team. And he agreed with me, so it doesnt matter that you said "As a fan of neither team"

Not at all, not one person here said it would start with pasta.
Pasta 1 for 1 is the more accurate trade
CatmanV a aimé ceci.
28 mai 2020 à 17 h 49
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lol @CatmanV is a fan of neither team. And he agreed with me, so it doesnt matter that you said "As a fan of neither team"

Not at all, not one person here said it would start with pasta.
Pasta 1 for 1 is the more accurate trade


A winger is not worth a centre. Pasta is a extremely good player but Eichel is better and Centres cost way more. Pasta + at least a 1st round pick but I'd wager it would be more than that.
28 mai 2020 à 18 h 5
#28
CatmanVal
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
A winger is not worth a centre. Pasta is a extremely good player but Eichel is better and Centres cost way more. Pasta + at least a 1st round pick but I'd wager it would be more than that.


Quite the contrary. Wingers are generally more valuable than a center because there are far less of them.
Pasta is currently being considered a top 3 RW, but Eichel isn’t even a top 5 center. This doesn’t mean that Pasta is better though. But what it does mean is that pasta is more valuable. Factor all of that in along with skill, you get a 1 for 1 at best.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
28 mai 2020 à 18 h 6
#29
CatmanVal
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
As a fan of neither team you guys are arguing about which secondary players are better than which secondary players. They are all secondary players. Eichel is the best player in the above trade and it is not remotely close. He is something that half the teams in the NHL wish they had, a true super elite franchise centre. Debrusk being better or worse or equal to Olofsson is completely irrelevant. Eichel wants out and Boston wants him, it would absolutely start with Pastrnak and it would be a significant price in addition to that. I don't think it would be unrealistic for Buffalo to want McAvoy or at least Carlo + as well.


Yeah like the other guy said. I am also a fan of neither team, just tryna make sure it’s fair.
Bruins don’t “want” Eichel, they have too much Center depth and prospective depth
28 mai 2020 à 18 h 15
#30
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CatmanV
Quite the contrary. Wingers are generally more valuable than a center because there are far less of them.
Pasta is currently being considered a top 3 RW, but Eichel isn’t even a top 5 center. This doesn’t mean that Pasta is better though. But what it does mean is that pasta is more valuable. Factor all of that in along with skill, you get a 1 for 1 at best.


Literally no one says that and there are 2 wingers to every centre. Just ridiculous statement.
28 mai 2020 à 19 h 56
#31
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Well...in a year, maybe 2 he gets a NMC. Now that happens


Not really. Then it’s just
Jack: Trade me to Boston!
Buffalo: no.
Jack: Please?
Buffalo: no.

The only way it happens is if he would rather not play than play anywhere else.
28 mai 2020 à 20 h 37
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Not really. Then it’s just
Jack: Trade me to Boston!
Buffalo: no.
Jack: Please?
Buffalo: no.

The only way it happens is if he would rather not play than play anywhere else.


Then it's like buffalo trade me, buffalo no, Jack ok I won't play, buffalo ok we will look around, Buffalo best deal came from LAK, Jack I won't waive unless it's .....
28 mai 2020 à 21 h 37
#33
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Literally no one says that and there are 2 wingers to every centre. Just ridiculous statement.


In that case, like he said, Pasta MUST BE better than Eichel if he is a top 3 LW but Eichel isnt even a top 5 Center. Because the point is, (even if you look at NHL ratings), there are far more centers at each level than wingers (despite there being a LW and a RW).
28 mai 2020 à 22 h 23
#34
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Then it's like buffalo trade me, buffalo no, Jack ok I won't play, buffalo ok we will look around, Buffalo best deal came from LAK, Jack I won't waive unless it's .....


Well then the NMCdoesn’t really have much to do with it
28 mai 2020 à 23 h 12
#35
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
In that case, like he said, Pasta MUST BE better than Eichel if he is a top 3 LW but Eichel isnt even a top 5 Center. Because the point is, (even if you look at NHL ratings), there are far more centers at each level than wingers (despite there being a LW and a RW).


The top 10 centres are worth more than any winger.
29 mai 2020 à 11 h 0
#36
CatmanVal
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Literally no one says that and there are 2 wingers to every centre. Just ridiculous statement.


Actually just relooking through, a few people have said that to me and bsilk18 so yeah
29 mai 2020 à 11 h 42
#37
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CatmanV
Actually just relooking through, a few people have said that to me and bsilk18 so yeah


This logic is the exact reason why the flat earth theory is gaining steam again. Or why there are antivaxers. Well 2 other people agree with my opinion that completely lacks any credibility or logic so it must be correct and truthful.
29 mai 2020 à 15 h 53
#38
MMBzFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 281
I like Eichel but not that much.
30 mai 2020 à 12 h 59
#39
MMBzFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 281
Think Ritchie and Kuraly would get more than a 2nd rounder. Agree more salary needs to go the other way.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage