Flames still say no

I'll wait for someone with more useful comments to rely on. But even if your correct, if this is a no it shows how far off the last one was.

This is worse than mine

Well so far I got two flame biased people with no useful comments so again, I'll wait for someone else.

I feel like this move would not make sense for Calgary because they have Gustafsson and Forbort. Murray is injured way too often and I feel like Calgary is happy with Johnny. (I'm not a Flames fan)

Murray is a risk, not gonna argue but all these discussions the last 6 months have been because the talk is that CGY is not happy with Gaudreau and they also think he's gonna leave in 2 years and lose trade value in 1. Gustafsson and Forbort are both UFA's so they can not be confirmed for next season.

Appreciate the real comment though.

Dude Johnny Hockey is pristine! You gotta pay big money no wammy’s. In this case its not bad. But ya really gotta hope Anderson becomes a 50 to 60 point guy. You could trade Rittich for something possibly. Murray is solid if they lose the guys they may, but a risk depends what you want out of him.
I would not accept. I would want Werenski and Korpisalo at least! I would want it to be surrounded by those two. Can you fit Anderson and walk away? Maybe throw a player of more value to CBJ with Johnny if that’s the case. Have to be a decent d prospect cuz man. Losing Werenski is big time, on second thought, him and Johnny would have similar value, just at different aspects.
Why are we trying to trading Gaudreau?

Werenski is not available under any circumstance. It's certainly a package for Johnny type deal and no package would have Zach. As for why are we trading Johnny, I'm not sure but ask CGY the last year.