SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup Team

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 8 mai 2020
Publié: 8 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
36 500 000 $
65 750 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Cirelli, Anthony6 500 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021
Choix de 2e ronde en 2021
Choix de 3e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
2.
NYR
    Gone with incentive
    3.
    NYR
      Gone for pick
      CGY
      1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
      4.
      CGY
      1. Hájek, Libor
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
      Détails additionnels:
      Add a forward prospect or something
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de DAL
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de VAN
      2021
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      2022
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NYR
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2281 500 000 $74 895 633 $0 $8 062 500 $6 604 367 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      AG
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
      AG
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
      AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      925 000 $925 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      863 333 $863 333 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      8 mai 2020 à 23 h 36
      #1
      Habs
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2016
      Messages: 2,224
      Mentions "j'aime": 384
      Why would you not go $6,341,151 for Cirelli and keep the 2nd round pick? Do you think $150,000 makes the difference?
      JumboJoe et csick a aimé ceci.
      9 mai 2020 à 5 h 44
      #2
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,581
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
      Tampa would match any offersheet for Cirelli under $7.5m.
      9 mai 2020 à 5 h 51
      #3
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,581
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
      What would be the incentive for Rangers to be able to shift Smith? Is a 3rd round pick as a makeweight about right?

      As it happens I recently included Smith as a cap dump to the Avs in this AGM:
      https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/1728643

      As per my trade description in the AGM, the logic of a Smith capdump to Colorado would be as follows:

      Rangers perspective:
      - Rangers need to move one of Staal or Smith in order to create space at LHD for their upcoming prospects (i.e. Hajek, Rykov, K'Andre Miller, Robertson).
      - They also need capspace to resign Strome, DeAngelo, and Georgiev.
      - With Staal having a NMC and thus impossible to move, Smith is the obvious choice. With a flat cap Rangers will find it hard to find a taker though, and thus use the lower of their 2021 3rd's to make it worthwhile to a team with unused capspace.

      Colorado's perspective:
      - Rather than go into the season with $5-6m in unused capspace, Avs weaponise it to pick up an extra draft pick. In Smith they also get a player who can still provide depth at both LHD and LW.
      - Smith is an UFA in 2021 so this only affects 1 year. His base salary for 2020/21 is only $2.35m which despite his caphit isn't unreasonable dollar-wise for a depth guy.
      - This move would still leave Colorado with over ~$1.5m unused capspace, meaning that there will be enough cap accrual by the deadline to still add a good player for the playoffs.
      9 mai 2020 à 10 h 21
      #4
      Habs
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2016
      Messages: 2,224
      Mentions "j'aime": 384
      Quoting: Richard88
      What would be the incentive for Rangers to be able to shift Smith? Is a 3rd round pick as a makeweight about right?

      As it happens I recently included Smith as a cap dump to the Avs in this AGM:
      https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/1728643

      As per my trade description in the AGM, the logic of a Smith capdump to Colorado would be as follows:

      Rangers perspective:
      - Rangers need to move one of Staal or Smith in order to create space at LHD for their upcoming prospects (i.e. Hajek, Rykov, K'Andre Miller, Robertson).
      - They also need capspace to resign Strome, DeAngelo, and Georgiev.
      - With Staal having a NMC and thus impossible to move, Smith is the obvious choice. With a flat cap Rangers will find it hard to find a taker though, and thus use the lower of their 2021 3rd's to make it worthwhile to a team with unused capspace.

      Colorado's perspective:
      - Rather than go into the season with $5-6m in unused capspace, Avs weaponise it to pick up an extra draft pick. In Smith they also get a player who can still provide depth at both LHD and LW.
      - Smith is an UFA in 2021 so this only affects 1 year. His base salary for 2020/21 is only $2.35m which despite his caphit isn't unreasonable dollar-wise for a depth guy.
      - This move would still leave Colorado with over ~$1.5m unused capspace, meaning that there will be enough cap accrual by the deadline to still add a good player for the playoffs.


      It would take more than a 3rd. As a comparable, Steve Mason had one year left @ $4.1M when the habs acquired Armia, a 4th and a 7th for Bourque, who had no value and was just taking up a roster spot.

      The arguement that smith could be useful depth is no different than arguing Mason could have been a backup goalie.

      Armia at that time carried the value of a ~ 2nd, so it took a 2nd, a 4th, and a 7th to offload that cap hit.

      Nobody is going to help the rangers for a 3rd round pick.
      9 mai 2020 à 11 h 58
      #5
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,581
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
      Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
      It would take more than a 3rd. As a comparable, Steve Mason had one year left @ $4.1M when the habs acquired Armia, a 4th and a 7th for Bourque, who had no value and was just taking up a roster spot.

      The arguement that smith could be useful depth is no different than arguing Mason could have been a backup goalie.

      Armia at that time carried the value of a ~ 2nd, so it took a 2nd, a 4th, and a 7th to offload that cap hit.

      Nobody is going to help the rangers for a 3rd round pick.


      Perhaps I underestimated how bad Brendan Smith has become. He played 62 games this season though so surely he can't be 'that' bad, or am I wrong?

      Regarding Mason, I think moving a goalie as a cap dump is probably harder to do than a skater. Teams only carry 2 goalies after all, so having a terrible 'cap dump' goalie would be far more noticeable to the roster than a 7th defenseman who's a capdump.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage