SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuilding - moves with PHI BUF NYI

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 21 avr. 2020
Publié: 21 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Cap lowered to $78M with teams given 1 CBO to use.

NHL allowing teams to use CBO on contracts not on their roster after the deadline seems like massive cap circumvention, so in this post I'm considering that it won't be allowed. I've seen too many posts here with the idea of CBOing Vlasic and trading Jones to a team that wouldn't have a player to CBO themselves, like Leafs for example, Allowing it doesn't make any sense.

SJ uses the CBO to buyout Martin Jones.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1874 125 $
1850 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Rossi, Marco
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  2. Voracek, Jakub
Détails additionnels:
SJ could have use for a TOP6 RW as they lack an asset for that slot. Ghost need a new start, and maybe playing with elite offensive D as his pair his career could get a new boost.
PHI
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
PHI could have use for a first pair RHD to play alongside Provorov. Labanc brings them a young mid-6 winger with some potential to the team.
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
7th overall pick - SJ drafts Marco Rossi with the pick (assuming that Lafreniere, Byfield, Stutzle, Drysdale, Raymond and Holtz go before him)
BUF
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Hertl, Tomas
Détails additionnels:
BUF wants to strengthen their team and they're in a dire need for 2C. Hertl is just that. They also gain a semi potential asset in Gambrell.
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2378 000 000 $66 192 457 $0 $750 000 $11 807 543 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Rossi, Marco
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
874 125 $874 125 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Both bad. If we are rebuilding why do we get zero prospects for Labanc or Burns? Hertl also gets sold for a prospect you HOPE can be as good as Hertl and nothing more.
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 3,455
Mentions "j'aime": 1,624
No from the Isles, they already have 10 bottom 6 players.
Isles777 a aimé ceci.
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 26
#3
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: papishark
Both bad. If we are rebuilding why do we get zero prospects for Labanc or Burns? Hertl also gets sold for a prospect you HOPE can be as good as Hertl and nothing more.


Honestly in a deep draft a 7th overall pick for Hertl is a maximum you could hope.

As for Voracek and Ghost, both of them are easier pieces to trade than Burns, which is why I acquired them. They can be moved further near the deadline. Burns' limited NTC makes this near impossible.
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 41
#4
Chewy69
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 0
no way phi agrees and u can probe get more value for hertl, yes its a deep draft but you have no clue how a prosect is gonna pan out and hertl is established as a really good 2nd line winger
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 44
#5
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: chewy69420
no way phi agrees and u can probe get more value for hertl, yes its a deep draft but you have no clue how a prosect is gonna pan out and hertl is established as a really good 2nd line winger


Hertl's not a winger.
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,300
Mentions "j'aime": 4,694
Quoting: papishark
Both bad. If we are rebuilding why do we get zero prospects for Labanc or Burns? Hertl also gets sold for a prospect you HOPE can be as good as Hertl and nothing more.


I agree with you about the Hertl trade he gets you at the very least that 1st plus a top prospect.

The burns labanc trade would be good for us to get out of that contract and get some pieces back.
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: justaBoss
Hertl's not a winger.


He can be. He has played both in recent years. And excels at a first line level
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I agree with you about the Hertl trade he gets you at the very least that 1st plus a top prospect.

The burns labanc trade would be good for us to get out of that contract and get some pieces back.


But we dont get any back, Ghost is not worth as much as Labanc and Vorachecks contract is just as bad, just as a forward
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 57
#9
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: papishark
But we dont get any back, Ghost is not worth as much as Labanc and Vorachecks contract is just as bad, just as a forward


There's a major difference between their contracts though, and that is the fact that Voracek's contract expires at 35, Burns's at 40.
21 avr. 2020 à 17 h 58
#10
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: papishark
He can be. He has played both in recent years. And excels at a first line level


He's quite versatile, yes.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage