SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My Oilers

Créé par: KubaH
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 9 mars 2020
Publié: 9 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Canes will make this trade only if they sign a star goalie like Holtby or Lehner
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
EDM
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Chiasson, Alex
  2. Lavoie, Raphael [Liste de réserve]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de CAR
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2284 000 000 $84 224 365 $341 534 $730 000 $-224 365 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
808 333 $808 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars 2020 à 12 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Edmonton has zero interest in trading a top prospect for an overpaid meh backup goalie.
Scoob1978 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2020 à 12 h 48
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Yeah this should go over well, Considering the tumultuous relationship between Mrazek and Holland.
9 mars 2020 à 12 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: CD282
Edmonton has zero interest in trading a top prospect for an overpaid meh backup goalie.


Mrazek literally has been a good starter for the past 2 years.... what are you watching?????
KubaH a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2020 à 12 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: Caniac2000
Mrazek literally has been a good starter for the past 2 years.... what are you watching?????


Of 30 goalies that have played at least 35 games this year, Mrazek is 22nd with a .904 Sv%. Koskinen is 6th with a .917 Sv%. Mrazek would be the backup. And in any case, the UFA goalie market is flooded with talent this summer, the Oilers can pick up a guy like Greiss for about the same $ and term that Mrazek has left, with no asset cost. They certainly aren't trading a top prospect for a crappy backup.

904. I can't even imagine how bad that number would be playing behind Edmonton's defense.
9 mars 2020 à 13 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: CD282
Of 30 goalies that have played at least 35 games this year, Mrazek is 22nd with a .904 Sv%. Koskinen is 6th with a .917 Sv%. Mrazek would be the backup. And in any case, the UFA goalie market is flooded with talent this summer, the Oilers can pick up a guy like Greiss for about the same $ and term that Mrazek has left, with no asset cost. They certainly aren't trading a top prospect for a crappy backup.

904. I can't even imagine how bad that number would be playing behind Edmonton's defense.


If you think you're getting Greiss for less than 5, you are deluded. Mrazek gives you a cost controlled option going into next year with great %saves above expected, and a good dFSv%. Mrazek is not a backup LMAO, you should look at some meaningful stats
9 mars 2020 à 13 h 15
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: Caniac2000
If you think you're getting Greiss for less than 5, you are deluded. Mrazek gives you a cost controlled option going into next year with great %saves above expected, and a good dFSv%. Mrazek is not a backup LMAO, you should look at some meaningful stats


If he's a great starter, why aren't you advocating CAR keeps him? Oh, that's right, because he isn't a great starter. Carolina is barely clinging to the last WC spot despite having one of the best defense corps in the league - a big part of this is due to goaltending.

Since Mrazek is considerably worse than Koskinen, he'd be the backup. He also doesn't have a great history with Holland so he wouldn't be an offseason trade target for the Oilers anyhow.

And Greiss doesn't have a lot of leverage as the UFA market is flooded with talent this summer.
9 mars 2020 à 13 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: CD282
If he's a great starter, why aren't you advocating CAR keeps him? Oh, that's right, because he isn't a great starter. Carolina is barely clinging to the last WC spot despite having one of the best defense corps in the league - a big part of this is due to goaltending.

Since Mrazek is considerably worse than Koskinen, he'd be the backup. He also doesn't have a great history with Holland so he wouldn't be an offseason trade target for the Oilers anyhow.

And Greiss doesn't have a lot of leverage as the UFA market is flooded with talent this summer.


No, because we have Nedeljkovic who's got a great ceiling. I'd rather go with the young guy and maximise our return for him. Our xGA is one of the highest in the league, we have a great D core, but it's all injured! Pesce Hamilton and Vatanen have all not played a game since pre-deadline. We're just in a WC spot because the Metro is a bloodbath, we'd be in comfortably in the Pacific.
9 mars 2020 à 13 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Quoting: Caniac2000
If you think you're getting Greiss for less than 5, you are deluded. Mrazek gives you a cost controlled option going into next year with great %saves above expected, and a good dFSv%. Mrazek is not a backup LMAO, you should look at some meaningful stats


meaningful stats like 33-18-13 2.75 .917 ?
CD282 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2020 à 13 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: CzechingOut
meaningful stats like 33-18-13 2.75 .917 ?


Meaningful stats like +4.05 saves above expected, +0.2 dFS% and a 3rd round playoff series appearance last eyar
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage