Forums/Armchair-GM

Galchenyuk to Chicago

Créé par: Chigurrhh
Date de création initiale: fév 1, 2020
Publié: Feb 1 at 1:41 pm
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Explications
Bowman likes reclamation projects. Low risk move to see how a guy fits on the team. If they like him, they can sign him. If not, they can move on.

Penguins don't need the cap space and can retain half to move him.

Obviously, Chicago has a lot of LWs right now. They can try him at C, RW, move Kubalik to the right side, or send Nylander down (since he isn't doing much anyway).

Penguins then make another move for a winger.
Transactions
PIT
  1. 2020 5e round pick (CHI)
CHI
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex (2 450 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Alex Galchenyuk: 2 450 000 $ (50%)
Enfoui
  • Casey DeSmith: 175 000 $ (1 250 000 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
CHI
PIT
2021
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
ANA
2022
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 674 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $4 825 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
PIT
McCann, Jared
1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
PIT
Crosby, Sidney
8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
PIT
Hörnqvist, Patric
5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
PIT
Kahun, Dominik
925 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
PIT
Malkin, Evgeni
9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
PIT
Rust, Bryan
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
PIT
Aston-Reese, Zach
1 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
PIT
Blueger, Teddy
750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
PIT
Tanev, Brandon
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
PIT
Simon, Dominik
750 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
PIT
Bjugstad, Nick
4 100 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
PIT
Lafferty, Sam
767 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
PIT
Dumoulin, Brian
4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
PIT
Letang, Kris
7 250 000 $
DD
NMC NTC
UFA - 3
PIT
Murray, Matt
3 750 000 $
G
RFA - 1
PIT
Johnson, Jack
3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
PIT
Schultz, Justin
5 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
PIT
Jarry, Tristan
675 000 $
G
RFA - 1
PIT
Marino, John
925 000 $
D
RFA - 2
PIT
Ruhwedel, Chad
700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
PIT
Pettersson, Marcus
874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
PIT
Riikola, Juuso
850 000 $
D
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
PIT
Guentzel, Jake
6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 fév à 13 h 43
#1
Rejoint: avr 2017
Messages: 7,693
Mentions "j'aime": 1,893
Chicago would probably gamble on him for a low pick like that given the amount of cap space we have open this year.
Chigurrhh et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
1 fév à 14 h 18
#2
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 48
I'd say no salary retention if that's the pick Chicago is sending. Pittsburgh most likely wants the cap space for another deadline deal if they're making this trade.
1 fév à 14 h 27
#3
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 844
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: CPH
I'd say no salary retention if that's the pick Chicago is sending. Pittsburgh most likely wants the cap space for another deadline deal if they're making this trade.


Capfriendly has the Penguins with $6,322,963 in deadline space. And that's without Guentzel on LTIR. They really don't need the space.

Something like this could be done with or without the retention. My reasoning is that if he was easy to move, it would have happened by now. Maybe just give a team more incentive to take him.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
1 fév à 14 h 31
#4
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Capfriendly has the Penguins with $6,322,963 in deadline space. And that's without Guentzel on LTIR. They really don't need the space.

Something like this could be done with or without the retention. My reasoning is that if he was easy to move, it would have happened by now. Maybe just give a team more incentive to take him.


True, but as part of a deal he could still be useful. The problem is who to replace him with unless we're trusting a young guy to help in the playoffs. Not that galchenyuk would help more I just figure something like this would only happen if it was part of a bigger picture deal to get pieces for a playoff run.
1 fév à 14 h 40
#5
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 844
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: CPH
True, but as part of a deal he could still be useful. The problem is who to replace him with unless we're trusting a young guy to help in the playoffs. Not that galchenyuk would help more I just figure something like this would only happen if it was part of a bigger picture deal to get pieces for a playoff run.


He played 4:30 of ice time last night. He’s clearly not trusted at the moment.

With Bjugstad and Kahun healthy and the plan to add another winger via trade, he’s the odd man out of the lineup. The 13th forward can be Lafferty or cheap forward acquired that Sullivan trusts to play in defensive situations or to kill penalties.
Goavs141 a aimé ceci.
1 fév à 14 h 55
#6
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: Chigurrhh
He played 4:30 of ice time last night. He’s clearly not trusted at the moment.

With Bjugstad and Kahun healthy and the plan to add another winger via trade, he’s the odd man out of the lineup. The 13th forward can be Lafferty or cheap forward acquired that Sullivan trusts to play in defensive situations or to kill penalties.


I agree, and I'm betting the only reason he hasn't been moved yet is because he needs to be used to acquire a piece for a bigger trade or he's to be used in that bigger trade. The issue is that obviously he's useless defensively, takes stupid penalties, and has no chemistry with anyone....
1 fév à 15 h 08
#7
Go Hawks
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 1,341
Mentions "j'aime": 533
I'd be down for this, even without the retention.
Chigurrhh et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
1 fév à 15 h 27
#8
Habs/Pens fan
Rejoint: oct 2017
Messages: 838
Mentions "j'aime": 259
I like it. Makes sense for both teams.
Chigurrhh et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
1 fév à 15 h 47
#9
you know nothing
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 6
that 6.3m number takes into account dumo and bjug on IR also, so im not sure what the number will be without them. i think we can afford to retain - but im not sure.
1 fév à 15 h 50
#10
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 844
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: karnagex
that 6.3m number takes into account dumo and bjug on IR also, so im not sure what the number will be without them. i think we can afford to retain - but im not sure.


That’s false. Neither player is on LTIR. Both count for the cap. Number is actually higher when both are healthy and they can send down AHL guys.
1 fév à 16 h 33
#11
you know nothing
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Chigurrhh
That’s false. Neither player is on LTIR. Both count for the cap. Number is actually higher when both are healthy and they can send down AHL guys.


ahhh okay okay makes sense, thanks!
Chigurrhh a aimé ceci.
1 fév à 16 h 57
#12
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 844
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Modifié 1 fév à 20 h 08
Quoting: karnagex
ahhh okay okay makes sense, thanks!


No problem. To put it simply,

IR=you get an extra roster spot when player is injured

LTIR=you can go over the cap (by the amount equaling the player’s cap hit) and get an extra roster spot when a player is injured.
karnagex a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage