SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tatar

Créé par: Sonuvabirch69
Équipe: 2019-20 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2020
Publié: 26 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
MTL
  1. Baertschi, Sven
  2. Juolevi, Olli
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
The 2021 third can become a first if the Canucks make the playoffs in both 2020 and 2021. If the Canucks fail to qualify for the playoffs in 2021, the pick will remain a third.
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 668 546 $0 $4 550 000 $1 831 454 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 5
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,220
Mentions "j'aime": 538
need a guaranteed 1st
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 16
#2
a11111
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,358
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Fetid .
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
JT Miller for a conditionnal 3rd and Juulsen
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 25
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Modifié 27 janv. 2020 à 2 h 2
Quoting: GMs
JT Miller for a conditionnal 3rd and Juulsen


I question whether you have looked at our trade surplus. Vancouver is totally unwilling to give up what you have asked for, unless you REALLY make it worth our while. I don’t think you have...

We could live with what you’re sending us but not in this deal. Your deal is so woefully insufficient when I consider value for what you’re asking for in return.
Tmclean64 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 35
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: BigOaf69
need a guaranteed 1st


Remember the last time a team traded a guaranteed first for Tatar? He sucked in Vegas, but the Golden Knights got lucky and made the Stanley Cup Finals. I’m not taking that same risk for him.
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
Remember the last time a team traded a guaranteed first for Tatar? He sucked in Vegas, but the Golden Knights got lucky and made the Stanley Cup Finals. I’m not taking that same risk for him.


He did fits in Vegas doesn’t mean and doesn’t fit anywhere. The asking price will be a guaranteed first + the team who’ll overpaid ( might be a 2nd or prospect )
26 janv. 2020 à 16 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,040
Mentions "j'aime": 658
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
Remember the last time a team traded a guaranteed first for Tatar? He sucked in Vegas, but the Golden Knights got lucky and made the Stanley Cup Finals. I’m not taking that same risk for him.


Then you just won't get him because this offer is very underwhelming.
26 janv. 2020 à 17 h 17
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,220
Mentions "j'aime": 538
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
Remember the last time a team traded a guaranteed first for Tatar? He sucked in Vegas, but the Golden Knights got lucky and made the Stanley Cup Finals. I’m not taking that same risk for him.


then trade your 1st and a B prospect for Kreider who is far less productive
26 janv. 2020 à 18 h 37
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,834
Mentions "j'aime": 551
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
Remember the last time a team traded a guaranteed first for Tatar? He sucked in Vegas, but the Golden Knights got lucky and made the Stanley Cup Finals. I’m not taking that same risk for him.


The Vegas debacle had an important element to it: it was his first time ever being traded. He thought he was a Red Wing for life. He was also coming into a team that had gelled unexpectedly in its first year of operations. It was a tough team to crack. While it's reasonable for buyers to beware in his case, that can be accommodated by adding future considerations that rebalance the trade -- if necessary -- in a coupke of years.
26 janv. 2020 à 19 h 12
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: LumberJacques
Then you just won't get him because this offer is very underwhelming.


It fits the Habs needs as Romanov is coming in pretty soon, and Juolevi would be behind him on the left defense chart. We certainly don’t need an injury prone defenseman, but he has shown signs of promise and glimpses. I’d rather he play elsewhere than Vancouver.
26 janv. 2020 à 19 h 12
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: BigOaf69
then trade your 1st and a B prospect for Kreider who is far less productive


Yeah, like Kreider is going to waive his clause to go to a Canadian team.
26 janv. 2020 à 22 h 33
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,040
Mentions "j'aime": 658
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
It fits the Habs needs as Romanov is coming in pretty soon, and Juolevi would be behind him on the left defense chart. We certainly don’t need an injury prone defenseman, but he has shown signs of promise and glimpses. I’d rather he play elsewhere than Vancouver.


The point is that MTL require at least a guaranteed 1st to move Tatar. If VAN don't want to provide it then some other team will.

Juolevi would be an interesting add for MTL but more in a change of scenery type trade, not as the centerpiece of a Tatar trade IMO.
26 janv. 2020 à 22 h 40
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: LumberJacques
The point is that MTL require at least a guaranteed 1st to move Tatar. If VAN don't want to provide it then some other team will.

Juolevi would be an interesting add for MTL but more in a change of scenery type trade, not as the centerpiece of a Tatar trade IMO.


How about Tatar for Juolevi, Baertschi, a 2020 second and a 2021 first (which transfers to 2022 if the Canucks miss the playoffs in 2021)?
26 janv. 2020 à 22 h 49
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,040
Mentions "j'aime": 658
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
How about Tatar for Juolevi, Baertschi, a 2020 second and a 2021 first (which transfers to 2022 if the Canucks miss the playoffs in 2021)?


Yeah that's definitely a much better offer that MTL would strongly consider. Maybe a team able to offer a 2020 1st could win out but this is definitely an acceptable offer.
27 janv. 2020 à 10 h 44
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,588
Mentions "j'aime": 6,728
There's just so much uncertainty with Juolevi that i'm nervous taking him in this offer. If he was at least playing in the NHL on the bottom pair in sheltered minutes even, we could at least get to see the potential against NHL opposition. I don't think he's a bust yet but I'm not entirely sure he'll be a stud yet either. If I'm MTL I'd try to look elsewhere first.
Sonuvabirch69 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage