SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vegas annoucer asked for Gus

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 3 janv. 2020
Publié: 3 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
During the Vegas game tonight, the announcer was asking why they haven't pulled the trigger on Gus yet, well I believe it is happening. The rumors in Vegas are swirling.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Pysyk, Mark
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Cap Dump
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
3.
4.
CHI
  1. Bogosian, Zach
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Koekkoek, Slater
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $52 908 461 $0 $6 815 000 $28 591 539 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 733 333 $2 733 333 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
700 000 $700 000 $
D
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 janv. 2020 à 2 h 34
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
I somewhat like these moves, although I have hard time seeing Crawford in any other Jersey tham Blackhawks'. If goaltending was a big issue for Leafs, I think they should consider, but lately, Hutchinson has been decent enough...

VGK and BUF trades are nice, I like them both.

FLA trade is also pretty good, although I don't think FLA can actually afford it. They're pretty tight with the cap, too...
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
3 janv. 2020 à 2 h 36
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,226
Mentions "j'aime": 9,595
Quoting: BurgerBoss
I somewhat like these moves, although I have hard time seeing Crawford in any other Jersey tham Blackhawks'. If goaltending was a big issue for Leafs, I think they should consider, but lately, Hutchinson has been decent enough...

VGK and BUF trades are nice, I like them both.

FLA trade is also pretty good, although I don't think FLA can actually afford it. They're pretty tight with the cap, too...


I think FLA can take on another $1.3M after dumping Pysyk and they definitely need a LHD shutdown guy. Maatta is a Coach Q kind of defender so see it as a fit plus he has a $680K buyout so relatively cheap. Maybe Hawks take on another cap move in that trade?

Yeah, Crow would be hard to see in another jersey. There's talk about the Hawks bringing back Crow cheap on a short term deal along with extending Lehner. That said, Toronto's defense is not good and going into the playoffs, they need to give andresen a rest, Crow is head and shoulders above hutch.
3 janv. 2020 à 2 h 46
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,227
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Sabres decline hard
3 janv. 2020 à 2 h 53
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,226
Mentions "j'aime": 9,595
Quoting: JokiharjuForNylanderLMAO
Sabres decline hard


Why is that? They move down a round to rid themselves of that anchor contract so they can make another resulting move to grab a asset. Bowman was at the last Sabres game, something is cooking and rumor is it does involve Bogosian getting dumped to the Hawks.
3 janv. 2020 à 2 h 55
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,227
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: ChiHawk
Why is that? They move down a round to rid themselves of that anchor contract so they can make another resulting move to grab a asset. Bowman was at the last Sabres game, something is cooking and rumor is it does involve Bogosian getting dumped to the Hawks.

No urgency to dump an expiring contract. Bogosian requested a trade but GMJB said he’s not gonna let players dictate his “plan” definitely not going to trade assets to rid of these players. We’d trade Bogo for like a 6th and retain half his deal or just absorb the deal for the rest of the very lost season.
3 janv. 2020 à 2 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,226
Mentions "j'aime": 9,595
Quoting: JokiharjuForNylanderLMAO
No urgency to dump an expiring contract. Bogosian requested a trade but GMJB said he’s not gonna let players dictate his “plan” definitely not going to trade assets to rid of these players. We’d trade Bogo for like a 6th and retain half his deal or just absorb the deal for the rest of the very lost season.


If you guys are going to make a move, then Bogosian will get dumped. You can't dump a big contract like that for a 6th rounder...you're dreaming. Your GM is giving up the season either so there is a trade coming and rumor is the Hawks are involved and they have cap to take on a dump but are going to want a prospect in return. Also rumors around Saad going to Buf, if that's true that will cost a 1st plus Bogosian. Saad would put Frolik in the pressbox in a new york minute.
3 janv. 2020 à 3 h 1
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,227
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: ChiHawk
If you guys are going to make a move, then Bogosian will get dumped. You can't dump a big contract like that for a 6th rounder...you're dreaming. Your GM is giving up the season either so there is a trade coming and rumor is the Hawks are involved and they have cap to take on a dump but are going to want a prospect in return. Also rumors around Saad going to Buf, if that's true that will cost a 1st plus Bogosian.


Unrealistic to all hell. Botts said he’s not letting players dictate his plan. If he trades assets to dump an expiring contract who requested a trade he’s eating his own ass. We can absorb his deal without pointlessly trading prospects that we need and picks we are already almost having drought with instead of moving them for a season we’ve already lost. I’d give up if he did it.
3 janv. 2020 à 3 h 6
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,226
Mentions "j'aime": 9,595
Quoting: JokiharjuForNylanderLMAO
Unrealistic to all hell. Botts said he’s not letting players dictate his plan. If he trades assets to dump an expiring contract who requested a trade he’s eating his own ass. We can absorb his deal without pointlessly trading prospects that we need and picks we are already almost having drought with instead of moving them for a season we’ve already lost. I’d give up if he did it.


Gosh, wouldn't it be nice to have Saad but hey, you guys got Frolik! lol Seriously though, Sabres up against the cap, giving up a good prospect for Saad and dumping Bogosian to make room makes a lot of sense. It was confirmed Bowman was at the Sabres game which means he's meeting with them. All the rumors have been saying is Hawks to absorb Bogosian's contract which means there's another move the Sabres are making; maybe with the Hawks (saad) maybe with another team.
3 janv. 2020 à 3 h 19
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,227
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: ChiHawk
Gosh, wouldn't it be nice to have Saad but hey, you guys got Frolik! lol Seriously though, Sabres up against the cap, giving up a good prospect for Saad and dumping Bogosian to make room makes a lot of sense. It was confirmed Bowman was at the Sabres game which means he's meeting with them. All the rumors have been saying is Hawks to absorb Bogosian's contract which means there's another move the Sabres are making; maybe with the Hawks (saad) maybe with another team.


What do you expect for Saad? Our top 10 guaranteed pick? You see? It’s not realistic. Not to mention I love Saad and he can fill a hole at our 2nd line RW but we are in no position for these moves.
3 janv. 2020 à 21 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
These seem all very realistic. I just think we are probably overpaying TOR for Johnsson, Nylander still has value IMO, although we are getting frustrated with him I still think he has potential.

Could we get a 2nd rounder from FLA with the cap dump for Maatta?
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
4 janv. 2020 à 0 h 12
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,226
Mentions "j'aime": 9,595
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
These seem all very realistic. I just think we are probably overpaying TOR for Johnsson, Nylander still has value IMO, although we are getting frustrated with him I still think he has potential.

Could we get a 2nd rounder from FLA with the cap dump for Maatta?


Possibly
5 janv. 2020 à 13 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 68
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Why is it that in every trade scenario the Leafs get more back for almost nothing? My God. I'd hang up the phone if that was what Toronto offered.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage