SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Georgiev offers

Créé par: BlueshirtBear29
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 17 déc. 2019
Publié: 17 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What would you offer?
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $77 212 300 $0 $4 195 000 $4 287 700 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 déc. 2019 à 3 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Gareth Sparks.....oh....we got rid of that one already......
17 déc. 2019 à 3 h 51
#2
More To Come
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,560
Mentions "j'aime": 371
Artemi Kniazev
Zacharie Emond
3rd Rd Pick
17 déc. 2019 à 8 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: Eklund
Artemi Kniazev
Zacharie Emond
3rd Rd Pick


LOL
17 déc. 2019 à 8 h 26
#4
More To Come
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,560
Mentions "j'aime": 371
Quoting: NYR_Mike
LOL


Sorry but Georgiev isn't proven and he isn't exactly going to command the high price NYR fans think. Get real dude.
17 déc. 2019 à 8 h 44
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,323
Mentions "j'aime": 23,144
First, I think Gorgiev is good enough to give up good or potentially good assets for. Rangers really can't afford a big cap hit this year or next year. Rangers might be looking at low cost wingers as they likely will lose/or not sign four UFA wingers. Leafs have some wingers that might be of interest if the Rangers even want to move Georgiev, I think there is a fit.
17 déc. 2019 à 8 h 55
#6
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: Eklund
Sorry but Georgiev isn't proven and he isn't exactly going to command the high price NYR fans think. Get real dude.


i guess 60 games over 3 seasons means you aren't "proven". Or that he's improved in each of his seasons dramatically. Or that on a bad NYR team that allows 3.21 goals per game, he has a 2.72 GAA and a .920+ save percentage over 16 games (OMG SUCH A SMALL SAMPLE SIZE WHEN WE ARE ONLY 33 GAMES INTO THE SEASON).


I mean he definitely is getting up there in age and retirement is coming, it's not like he's under team control much longer, to be honest he's probably at most an AHL backup or an ECHL starter-- no way does he have a future in the NHL, he should really just retire cause he sucks so much [this is as accurate as your statement there buddy].

oh btw, he's ranked 16th in the league for GA% and GSAA which just implies he's just not good at all Huh?
17 déc. 2019 à 8 h 56
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Modifié 17 déc. 2019 à 9 h 2
Quoting: Spanky227
i guess 60 games over 3 seasons means you aren't "proven". Or that he's improved in each of his seasons dramatically. Or that on a bad NYR team that allows 3.21 goals per game, he has a 2.72 GAA and a .920+ save percentage over 16 games (OMG SUCH A SMALL SAMPLE SIZE WHEN WE ARE ONLY 33 GAMES INTO THE SEASON).


I mean he definitely is getting up there in age and retirement is coming, it's not like he's under team control much longer, to be honest he's probably at most an AHL backup or an ECHL starter-- no way does he have a future in the NHL, he should really just retire cause he sucks so much [this is as accurate as your statement there buddy].

oh btw, he's ranked 16th in the league for GA% and GSAA which just implies he's just not good at all Huh?


Keep him then...actually hes 43 GP......3,03 and 91,6% till this Season.......had few good sunshine days this year and hes The Kings second coming already.....and ppl are mocking TML homers....
17 déc. 2019 à 9 h 4
#8
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: Laudan
Keep him then...Actually hes 43 GP......3,03 and 91,6% till this Season.......had few good sunshine days this Season and hes The Kings second coming already.....and ppl are mocking TML homers....


will do popcorn

JG already said he's not trading him, and while that's a tactic to make teams pay more, the rangers really have no need to trade him at this moment. lundqvist is gone in one more year and a tandem of Shesterkin and Georgiev could be one of the best in the NHL in a few years (say shest take 60% of the starts). If anything, rangers will trade Huska or Wall since they also have Lindbom who is younger. If a team is willing to overpay --Georgiev is gone, but a team is going to have to overpay. Think Martin Jones, Varlomov, etc
17 déc. 2019 à 9 h 44
#9
More To Come
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,560
Mentions "j'aime": 371
Quoting: Spanky227
i guess 60 games over 3 seasons means you aren't "proven". Or that he's improved in each of his seasons dramatically. Or that on a bad NYR team that allows 3.21 goals per game, he has a 2.72 GAA and a .920+ save percentage over 16 games (OMG SUCH A SMALL SAMPLE SIZE WHEN WE ARE ONLY 33 GAMES INTO THE SEASON).


I mean he definitely is getting up there in age and retirement is coming, it's not like he's under team control much longer, to be honest he's probably at most an AHL backup or an ECHL starter-- no way does he have a future in the NHL, he should really just retire cause he sucks so much [this is as accurate as your statement there buddy].

oh btw, he's ranked 16th in the league for GA% and GSAA which just implies he's just not good at all Huh?


Great. He isn’t proven over a full season yet. I think he is a good goalie but I wouldn’t be willing to offer a 1st or a blue chip for him and it’s not really even close. Sorry if you can’t take that.
17 déc. 2019 à 10 h 47
#10
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 8,118
Mentions "j'aime": 1,482
Quoting: Eklund
Great. He isn’t proven over a full season yet. I think he is a good goalie but I wouldn’t be willing to offer a 1st or a blue chip for him and it’s not really even close. Sorry if you can’t take that.


Oh it's close! Considering he's a blue chip himself, easily the best g available with even more promise. He's no longer a maybe. Easily worth a late 1st. ***Doesn't matter, thankfully we are Not trading him...
17 déc. 2019 à 11 h 30
#11
Lamar1226
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 490
Mentions "j'aime": 106
As a Ranger fan I would be very upset if we got less than a mid 1st round pick. If you look at the Rangers trades of goaltenders in the past Cam Talbot and Antti Raanta would be great comparisons.

Antti Ranta + Derek Stepan = 1st #7 overall + Anthony Deangelo: Ranta (traded at age 27) on a decent team had a similar amount of games played and a similar save % to Georgiev.
Cam Talbot = 2nd, 3rd, 7th (picks 57, 79 and 184 overall): Talbot (traded at age 27) had a higher save % on a way better NYR team with slightly fewer games played than Georgiev.

Something to keep in mind is that Georgi who is younger (23) than both of these goalies, is putting up very good numbers on a bad Ranger team. He also lacks any playoff experience.
gregory_papas a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2019 à 19 h 2
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 851
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: lamar1226
As a Ranger fan I would be very upset if we got less than a mid 1st round pick. If you look at the Rangers trades of goaltenders in the past Cam Talbot and Antti Raanta would be great comparisons.

Antti Ranta + Derek Stepan = 1st #7 overall + Anthony Deangelo: Ranta (traded at age 27) on a decent team had a similar amount of games played and a similar save % to Georgiev.
Cam Talbot = 2nd, 3rd, 7th (picks 57, 79 and 184 overall): Talbot (traded at age 27) had a higher save % on a way better NYR team with slightly fewer games played than Georgiev.

Something to keep in mind is that Georgi who is younger (23) than both of these goalies, is putting up very good numbers on a bad Ranger team. He also lacks any playoff experience.


very interesting. your making a lot of sense. i didn't think he would get a first but i think you just sold me on it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage