SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Crow

Créé par: Eklund
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 2 déc. 2019
Publié: 2 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
SJS
  1. Crawford, Corey (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Koekkoek, Slater
CHI
  1. Chmelevski, Alexander
  2. Dillon, Brenden
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 135 750 $660 750 $277 500 $8 364 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
960 000 $960 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 déc. 2019 à 6 h 23
#1
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Not bad, addresses the backup goalie problem going down the stretch and gives Chicago a potential steal in Chmelevski. Don’t care much for Koekkoek. Chicago is likely not making the playoffs again so maybe they accept a 3rd? They’re very likely not re-signing Crawford either...
2 déc. 2019 à 9 h 21
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,792
Mentions "j'aime": 9,964
As a CHI fan...I'd probably do that. I don't think Dillon would stay in CHI for long though. Another pending UFA and history shows 7th dmen might even be able to fetch a 3rd rounder @ the TDL (Brendan Davidson, Nick Holden, even Kempny at the time was a fairly regular healthy scratch. Obviously WAS won out on that trade.)
2 déc. 2019 à 12 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Um no? Why would we give up a top 4 D, a top prospect and a second for a UFA goalie and a 9th dman
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 23
#4
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Quoting: papishark
Um no? Why would we give up a top 4 D, a top prospect and a second for a UFA goalie and a 9th dman


I don’t think Chmelevski is a top prospect in the sharks org anymore. A healthy scratch for the last month and zero points in 7 AHL games...he’s been overtaken by Blichfeld, True and Kellman.

Dillon is not a top four. Not on the Sharks and not on most teams. Dunno where you got that...
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 25
#5
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Quoting: exo2769
As a CHI fan...I'd probably do that. I don't think Dillon would stay in CHI for long though. Another pending UFA and history shows 7th dmen might even be able to fetch a 3rd rounder @ the TDL (Brendan Davidson, Nick Holden, even Kempny at the time was a fairly regular healthy scratch. Obviously WAS won out on that trade.)


Dillon is a serviceable bottom pairing dman. Certainly not a 7th. And definitely not a 7th on Chicago’s D which, no offense, is terrible.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 27
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,792
Mentions "j'aime": 9,964
Quoting: Bill_Karsen
Dillon is a serviceable bottom pairing dman. Certainly not a 7th. And definitely not a 7th on Chicago’s D which, no offense, is terrible.


I just meant they'd flip him because they're not contenders this year and shouldn't let him walk away for free. Then was trying making a comparison as to what that trade might be. more than a 3rd sounds good to me.
Bill_Karsen a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 29
#7
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Quoting: papishark
Um no? Why would we give up a top 4 D, a top prospect and a second for a UFA goalie and a 9th dman

Also Crawford is a very capable goalie still who should be competing in the playoffs. If Jones slumps again, the sharks can roll with Crow confidently. It’s a very smart move and addresses the Sharks greatest need this year to make a push.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 31
#8
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Quoting: exo2769
I just meant they'd flip him because they're not contenders this year and shouldn't let him walk away for free. Then was trying making a comparison as to what that trade might be. more than a 3rd sounds good to me.

Sorry. Misread.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Bill_Karsen
I don’t think Chmelevski is a top prospect in the sharks org anymore. A healthy scratch for the last month and zero points in 7 AHL games...he’s been overtaken by Blichfeld, True and Kellman.

Dillon is not a top four. Not on the Sharks and not on most teams. Dunno where you got that...


Thats just flat out wrong. He was injured for the start of the season and has been very good since he got back
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 34
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Bill_Karsen
Also Crawford is a very capable goalie still who should be competing in the playoffs. If Jones slumps again, the sharks can roll with Crow confidently. It’s a very smart move and addresses the Sharks greatest need this year to make a push.


I dont think getting crawford is a bad idea, I just dont want to give up the equivalent of like 3 2nd rounders for him when he either walks or asks for 4mil+ in the offseason. Think we could get him with a third rounder or something similar
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 35
#11
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Quoting: papishark
Thats just flat out wrong. He was injured for the start of the season and has been very good since he got back


Sharks top four - Vlasic Karlsson - Simek Burns.

I am right. And most people will see it as right. Dillon is NOT a top four on the Sharks nor is he a top four on any other team except maybe the Jets.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 36
#12
Karsenbill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 256
Quoting: papishark
I dont think getting crawford is a bad idea, I just dont want to give up the equivalent of like 3 2nd rounders for him when he either walks or asks for 4mil+ in the offseason

Sasha was a 6th round pick. He may never even play in the NHL.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 37
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Bill_Karsen
Sharks top four - Vlasic Karlsson - Simek Burns.

I am right. And most people will see it as right. Dillon is NOT a top four on the Sharks nor is he a top four on any other team except maybe the Jets.


Im talking about Chemelevski. Dillon is a very fine Dman on most teams and isnt worthless like you are implying.
2 déc. 2019 à 13 h 40
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Bill_Karsen
Sasha was a 6th round pick. He may never even play in the NHL.


Bad take. Labanc was a 6th round pick,Gregor was a 4th,Balcers was a 5th,Joakim Ryan was a 7th,Demelo was a 6th,Wingels was a 6th.

Draft position doesn't determine value or player ability.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage